We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Footnotes
‡
Thanks to James Lennox, Molly Paxton, and Cecelia Watson for comments on an earlier version of this review essay.
References
Dennett, D. C.1989. Review of Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, by Richards, Robert J.. Philosophy of Science56:540–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopwood, N.2006. “Pictures of Evolution and Charges of Fraud: Ernst Haeckel’s Embryological Illustrations.” Isis97:260–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopwood, N.. 2009. “Darwinism’s Tragic Genius: Psychology and Reputation.” Essay Review of The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought, by Richards, Robert J.. Isis100:863–67.Google Scholar
Kulvicki, J.2010. “Knowing with Images: Medium and Message.” Philosophy of Science77:295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubichler, M. D., and Maienschein, J., eds. 2009. Form and Function in Developmental Evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. G.1994. Review of The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory, by Richards, Robert J.. Philosophy of Science61:673–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, A. C.2009. “Marine Invertebrates, Model Organisms, and the Modern Synthesis: Epistemic Values, Evo-Devo, and Exclusion.” Theory in Biosciences128:19–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, R. J.2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar