Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T08:47:40.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophical Aspects of the Group Selection Controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

John Cassidy
John Cassidy*
Affiliation:
SUNY at Albany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is primarily a study of the group selection controversy, with special emphasis on the period from 1962 to the present, and the rise of inclusive fitness theory. Interest is focused on the relations between individual fitness theory and other fitness theories and on the methodological imperatives used in the controversy over the status of these theories. An appendix formalizes the notion of “assertive part” which is used in the informal discussion of the methodological imperatives elicited from the controversy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 1978 , pp. 575 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ackermann, R. “Deductive Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 32 (1965): 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Ackermann, R. and Stenner, A. “A Corrected Model of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 33 (1966): 168–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Alexander, R. D. and Sherman, P. W. “Local Mate Competition and Parental Investment in Social Insects.” Science 196 (1977): 495–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[4] Ayala, F. (ed.) Molecular Evolution. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
[5] Bethell, T. “Darwin's Mistake.” Harper's 252 (1976): 70–75.Google Scholar
[6] Boorman, S. A. and Levitt, P. R. “Group Selection at the Boundary of a Stable Population.” Theoretical Population Biology 4 (1973): 85–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[7] Cassidy, J. The Simplicity of Scientific Theories Measured. Ph.D. dissertation, 1975, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
[8] Cassidy, J. “The Instinct Controversy.” Manuscript, 1977.Google Scholar
[9] Charnov, Eric L. “An Elementary Treatment of the Genetical Theory of Kin Selection.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 16 (1977): 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Eschel, I. “On the Neighbor Effect and the Evolution of Altruistic Traits.” Theoretical Population Biology 3 (1972): 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover, 1958. Original edition, 1930.Google Scholar
[12] Flannery, K. V. “The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3 (1972): 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Ghiselin, M. T. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.Google Scholar
[14] Ghiselin, M. T. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
[15] Gilpin, M. E. Group Selection in Predator-Prey Communities. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[16] Haldane, J. B. S. The Causes of Evolution. New York: Longmans, Green and Company, 1932.Google Scholar
[17] Hamilton, W. D. “The Evolution of Altruistic Behaviour.” American Naturalist 97 (1963): 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Hamilton, W. D. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 (1964): 1–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[19] Hamilton, W. D. “Extraordinary Sex Ratios.” Science 156 (1967): 477–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[20] Hamilton, W. D. “Geometry for the Selfish Herd.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 31 (1971): 295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[21] Hamilton, W. D. “Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: an approach from evolutionary genetics.” In Biosocial Anthropology, Edited by Fox, Robin.: Malaby Press, 1975. pp. 133–155.Google Scholar
[22] Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[23] Kuhn, T. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research.” In [25]. pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Lakatos, Imre “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In [25]. pp. 91–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Lejewski, C. “Studies in Lesniewski's Mereology.” Polish Society of Arts and Sciences Abroad Yearbook 34–50 (1954–1955):Google Scholar
[27] Levins, R. “Extinction.” In Some Mathematical Questions in Biology, Edited by Gerstenhaber, M. Providence: American Mathematical Society, 1970. pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
[28] Lewontin, R. C. “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1 (1970:) 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29] Lewontin, R. C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
[30] Luschei, E. The Logical Systems of Lesniewski. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1962.Google Scholar
[31] McClearn, G. and DeFries, J. Introduction to Behavior Genetics. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1973.Google Scholar
[32] Manser, A. R. “The Concept of Evolution.” Philosophy 40 (1965): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33] Maynard Smith, J. “Group Selection and Kin Selection.” Nature 201 (1966): 1145–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34] Maynard Smith, J. “Group Selection.” Quarterly Review of Biology 51 (1976): 277–283.Google Scholar
[35] Ochman, H. “Geometry for a Selfish Lek.” Manuscript fora sociobiology seminar, 1977, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
[36] Omer, I. “On the D-N Model of Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 37 (1970): 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37] Popper, K. “Normal Science and its Dangers.” In [25]. pp. 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38] Price, G. R. “Selection and Covariance.” Nature 227 (1970): 520–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[39] Price, G. R. “Extension of Covariance Selection Mathematics.” Annals of Human Genetics 35 (1972): 485–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[40] Selander, R. K. “Genic Variation in Natural Populations.” In [4]. pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
[41] Suppe, F. (ed.). The Structure of Scientific Theories. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1974. Contains his “The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories.” pp. 3–241.Google Scholar
[42] Suppes, P. “The Desirability of Formalization in Science.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968): 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[43] Tarski, A. Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon, 1956.Google Scholar
[44] Trivers, R. L. and Hare, H. “Haplodiploidy and the Evolution of the Social Insects.” Science 191 (1976): 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[45] Tuomela, R. “Deductive Explanation of Scientific Laws.” In Exact Philosophy, Edited by Bunge, M. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973.Google Scholar
[46] Wade, M. “An Experimental Study of Group Selection.” Evolution. (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[47] Wade, M. “A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection.” Forthcoming in Quarterly Review of Biology. (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[48] Wade, M. “The Evolution of Social Interactions by Family Selection.” manuscript.Google Scholar
[49] Williams, G. C. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[50] Wilson, D. S. “A Theory of Group Selection.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 72 (1975): 143–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[51] Wilson, D. S. Evolution of the Level of Populations and Communities. Manuscript of chapters 1–3.Google Scholar
[52] Wilson, E. O. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
[53] Wright, S. “Tempo and Mode in Evolution: a critical review.” Ecology 26 (1945): 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[54] Wynne-Edwards, V. C. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1962.Google Scholar