Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:46:53.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Philip Kitcher's The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Jarrett Leplin*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Extract

Philosophy has an honorable tradition as interpreter and advocate of science. That role is in decline. While other science studies disciplines deconstruct “reality”, “truth”, “rationality”, “knowledge”, and “progress” into the political tools of an interested elite, philosophy finds itself too divided over the scope of these concepts to defend them. The debate over realism in the philosophy of science is at an impasse. Agreeing on the relevant evidence and cognizant of the opposing arguments, the disputants cannot see what it would take to break the impasse. The philosophies of individual sciences progress, but no general analysis of scientific knowledge is sufficiently secure to advance against science's detractors.

Type
Critical Notice
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kitcher, P. (1993), The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar