Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Leonelli, Sabina
2018.
Including a Symposium on Mary Morgan: Curiosity, Imagination, and Surprise.
Vol. 36,
Issue. ,
p.
129.
Feest, Uljana
2019.
Why Replication Is Overrated.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 86,
Issue. 5,
p.
895.
Guttinger, Stephan
2019.
A New Account of Replication in the Experimental Life Sciences.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 86,
Issue. 3,
p.
453.
Bruner, Justin P.
and
Holman, Bennett
2019.
Self-correction in science: Meta-analysis, bias and social structure.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 78,
Issue. ,
p.
93.
Romero, Felipe
2019.
Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis.
Philosophy Compass,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 11,
Canali, Stefano
2020.
Towards a Contextual Approach to Data Quality.
Data,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 4,
p.
90.
Romero, Felipe
2020.
The Division of Replication Labor.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 5,
p.
1014.
Shipovalova, Lada
2020.
Max Weber’s ‘Inconvenient Facts’ and Contemporary Studies of Public Science Communication.
Social Epistemology,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 2,
p.
130.
Romero, Felipe
and
Sprenger, Jan
2021.
Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way.
Synthese,
Vol. 198,
Issue. S23,
p.
5803.
Rubin, Hannah
and
Schneider, Mike D.
2021.
Priority and privilege in scientific discovery.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 89,
Issue. ,
p.
202.
Agnoli, Franca
Fraser, Hannah
Singleton Thorn, Felix
and
Fidler, Fiona
2021.
Australian and Italian Psychologists’ View of Replication.
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
Bird, Alexander
2021.
Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 4,
p.
965.
Fletcher, Samuel C.
2021.
How (not) to measure replication.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 2,
Teplitskiy, Misha
Peng, Hao
Blasco, Andrea
and
Lakhani, Karim R.
2021.
Is Novel Research Worth Doing? Evidence from Journal Peer Review.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Tiokhin, Leonid
Yan, Minhua
and
Morgan, Thomas J. H.
2021.
Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help.
Nature Human Behaviour,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 7,
p.
857.
Heesen, Remco
and
Bright, Liam Kofi
2021.
Is Peer Review a Good Idea?.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 3,
p.
635.
Krpan, Dario
2022.
(When) should psychology be a science?.
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1,
p.
183.
Fleisher, Will
2022.
Pursuit and inquisitive reasons.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 94,
Issue. ,
p.
17.
Ventura, Rafael
2022.
Publish without bias or perish without replications.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 96,
Issue. ,
p.
10.
Stewart, Suzanne L. K.
Pennington, Charlotte R.
da Silva, Gonçalo R.
Ballou, Nick
Butler, Jessica
Dienes, Zoltan
Jay, Caroline
Rossit, Stephanie
and
Samara, Anna
2022.
Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: the view from the UKRN Local Network Leads.
BMC Research Notes,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,