Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:16:57.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural Selection, Causality, and Laws: What Fodor and Piatelli-Palmarini Got Wrong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Extract

In their book What Darwin Got Wrong, Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini construct an a priori philosophical argument and an empirical biological argument. The biological argument aims to show that natural selection is much less important in the evolutionary process than many biologists maintain. The a priori argument begins with the claim that there cannot be selection for one but not the other of two traits that are perfectly correlated in a population; it concludes that there cannot be an evolutionary theory of adaptation. This article focuses mainly on the a priori argument.

Type
Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Matthew Barker, John Basl, Ned Block, Mihnea Capraru, Hayley Clatterbuck, Jerry Fodor, Dan Hausman, Samir Okasha, Larry Shapiro, Michael Titelbaum, Davide Vecchi, Rob Wilson, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

References

Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1971. “Causality and Determination.” In Causation and Conditionals, ed. Sosa, E., 6381. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beatty, John. 1995. “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis.” In Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, ed. Wolters, G. and Lennox, J., 4581. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ned, and Kitcher, Philip. 2010. “Misunderstanding Darwin: Natural Selection's Secular Critics Get It Wrong.” Boston Review, March–April, http://bostonreview.net/BR35.2/block_kitcher.php.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. “Causal Relations.” In Causation and Conditionals, ed. Sosa, E., 8294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Endler, John. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1974. “The Special Sciences.” Synthese 28:77115.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 2008. “Against Darwinism.” Mind and Language 23:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, and Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo. 2010a. “‘Misunderstanding Darwin’: An Exchange.” Boston Review, March 17, http://bostonreview.net/BR35.2/darwin_exchange.php.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, and Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo. 2010b. What Darwin Got Wrong. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, and Sober, Elliott. 2010. “Science Saturday: Who Got What Wrong?” Bloggingheads.tv, March 20, http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/26848.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2010. Review of What Darwin Got Wrong, by Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini. Times Literary Supplement, March 26.Google Scholar
Papineau, David. 2010. Review of What Darwin Got Wrong, by Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini. Prospect 168:8384.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alex. 1994. Instrumental Biology; or, The Disunity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1984. The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1993. Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1997. “Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology.” Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S458S467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 2008. “Fodor's Bubbe Meise against Darwinism.” Mind and Language 23:4249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 2010. Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards? Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar