Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:12:08.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is Preacceleration of Particles in Dirac's Electrodynamics a Case of Backward Causation? The Myth of Retrocausation in Classical Electrodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Adolf Grünbaum*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh

Abstract

Is it a “conceptual truth” or only a logically contingent fact that, in any given kind of case, an event x which asymmetrically causes (“produces”) an event y likewise temporally precedes y or at least does not temporally succeed y? A bona fide physical example in which the cause retroproduces the effect would show that backward causation is no less conceptually possible than forward causation. And it has been claimed ([9], p. 151; [4], p. 41) that in Dirac's classical electrodynamics (relativistic and non-relativistic), the preacceleration of charged particles before any forces are applied to them furnishes a genuine case of retrocausation by later forces.

An exposition of the pertinent physics furnishes the basis for arguing the following: Whereas the non-zero acceleration of a neutral NEWTONIAN mass particle is, of course, causally connected as such to the simultaneously applied non-zero force, the non-zero acceleration of a DIRACIAN charged particle is not causally connected at all as such to the applied forces. A fortiori, in Dirac's electrodynamics, the applied forces do not qualify asymmetrically as the causes of a non-zero acceleration as such; nor does a non-zero acceleration as such qualify as an effect produced by forces. This is shown by means of two considerations as follows: (1) In Dirac's theory, no functional dependence of the value of a non-zero acceleration on the weighted time-average of the forces is vouchsafed as a matter of physical LAW alone without any value of a constant of integration, just as no Newtonian law(s) alone can guarantee a functional dependence of the non-zero value of the velocity of a Newtonian mass particle on the applied forces. Instead, both functional dependencies alike are vouchsafed only with the crucial aid of some de facto boundary condition pertaining to either the past or to the future, so that (2) Non-zero preaccelerations of Diracian charged particles can no more be causally attributed as such to the retrocausal action of later forces than non-zero “prevelocities” of Newtonian mass particles can be held to be caused as such by later applied forces. The retrocausal interpretation of Dirac's preaccelerations is just as invalid as the retrocausal interpretation of Newtonian prevelocities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am greatly indebted to my physicist colleagues Jeffrey Winicour, Ezra T. Newman and Allen Janis for invaluable explanations of some of the pertinent mathematical physics as well as for some references. I am likewise grateful to the physicists F. Rohrlich and J. D. Jackson for helpful correspondence. And I also thank the National Science Foundation for the support of research.

References

REFERENCES

Csonka, P. L.Advanced Effects in Particle Physics, I.” Physical Review 180 (1969): 12661281.10.1103/PhysRev.180.1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. C. W. The Physics of Time Asymmetry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) A 167 (1938): 148.Google Scholar
Earman, J.An Attempt to Add a Little Direction to ‘The Problem of the Direction of Time’.” Philosophy of Science 41 (March 1974): 1547.10.1086/288568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, P.Tachyons, Backwards Causation, and Freedom.” In PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII. Edited by Buck, R. C. and Cohen, R. S. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd, enlarged ed. Boston and Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973.10.1007/978-94-010-2622-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1962. A second edition was published in 1975.Google Scholar
Plass, G. N. Reviews of Modern Physics 33 (1961): 3762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrlich, F. Classical Charged Particles. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1965.Google Scholar
Tolman, R. C. Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1934.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article: