Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:14:18.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individualism and Semantic Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Sarah Patterson
Sarah Patterson*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper takes issue with Tyler Burge's claim that intentional states are nonindividualistically individuated in cognitive psychology. A discussion of current models of children's acquisition of semantic knowledge is used to motivate a thought-experiment which shows that psychologists working in this area are not committed to describing the concepts children attach to words in terms of the concepts standardly attached to those words in the child's community. The content of the child's representational states are thus not individuated with reference to linguistic environment in the manner that Burge's nonindividualistic view requires. The paper concludes that the explanatory states of cognitive psychology are sometimes individualistically individuated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 15 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anglin, J. (1977), Word, Object, and Conceptual Development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973), One Word at a Time; The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1978), “The Acquisition of Word Meaning: An Investigation into Some Current Conflicts”, in N. Waterson and C. Snow (eds.), The Development of Communication. New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 263–287.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1980), “The Structure and Origin of Semantic Categories in the Language-Learning Child”, in M. Foster and S. Brandes (eds.), Symbol as Sense: New Approaches to the Analysis of Meaning. New York: Academic Press, pp. 277–299.Google Scholar
Burge, T. (1979), “Individualism and the Mental”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. (1982a), “Other Bodies”, in A. Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 97–120.Google Scholar
Burge, T. (1982b), “Two Thought Experiments Reviewed”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23: 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. (1986a), “Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception”, in P. Pettit and J. McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought and Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 117–136.Google Scholar
Burge, T. (1986b), “Individualism and Psychology”, Philosophical Review 95: 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. (1986c), “Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind” Journal of Philosophy 83: 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1978), “The Child as Word Learner”, in M. Halle, J. Bresnan and G. Miller (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 264–293.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1982), “Semantic Development: The State of the Art”, in E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–389.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1985), Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986), Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1979), “What's in a Word? On the Child's Acquisition of Semantics in His First Language”, in V. Lee (ed.), Language Development. Reprint. New York: Academic Press, Wiley & Sons, pp. 186–234.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1983), “Meanings and Concepts”, in P. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 3, Cognitive Development. 4th ed. Edited by Flavell, J. H. and Markman, E. M. New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 787–840.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. (1974), “The Origin of Language Comprehension”, in R. Solso (ed.), Theories in Cognitive Psychology—The Loyola Symposium. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 331–368.Google Scholar