Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:02:01.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individualism and Evolutionary Psychology (or: In Defense of “Narrow” Functions)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

David J. Buller
David J. Buller*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University
*
†Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Millikan (1993) and Wilson (1994) argue, for different reasons, that the essential reference to the environment in adaptationist explanations of behavior makes (psychological) individualism inconsistent with evolutionary psychology. I show that their arguments are based on misinterpretations of the role of reference to the environment in such explanations. By exploring these misinterpretations, I develop an account of explanation in evolutionary psychology that is fully consistent with individualism. This does not, however, constitute a full-fledged defense of individualism, since evolutionary psychology is only one explanatory paradigm among many in psychology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 74 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

For thoughtful input on beta versions of this paper (not all of which I could incorporate while respecting word limits), I would like to thank Justin D'Arms, Valerie Hardcastle, Ruth Millikan, Elliott Sober, two anonymous referees, and an audience at Northwestern University (especially Arthur Fine, Christopher Horvath, David Hull, and Lenny Moss).

References

Alcock, J. (1993), Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach (5th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Amundson, R. (1994), “Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental Biology”, Philosophy of Science 61: 556–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, R. P. and Frankel, R. B. (1981), “Magnetic Navigation in Bacteria”, Scientific American 245(6): 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (1989), Microcognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1987), “From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link”, in Dupré, J. (ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 277–306.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. (1975), “Functional Analysis”, Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. (1995), Unravelling Animal Behaviour (2nd ed.). Essex, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1989), The Selfish Gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1988), Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (1992), Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. (1986), Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goode, R. and Griffiths, P. E. (1995), “The Misuse of Sober's Selection for/Selection of Distinction”, Biology and Philosophy 10: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D. (1994), “Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982), Evolution and the Theory of Games. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1993), The Theory of Evolution (Canto ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1988), “An Analysis of the Concept of Natural Selection”, in Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1984), Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (1993), White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Neander, K. (1995a), “Misrepresenting and Malfunctioning”, Philosophical Studies 79: 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. (1995b), “Pruning the Tree of Life”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1995), “Natural Selection and Distributive Explanation: A Reply to Neander”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 384–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. (1988), “The Emergence of Evolutionary Psychology”, in Pines, D. (ed.), Emerging Syntheses in Science. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1994), “Causal Depth, Theoretical Appropriateness, and Individualism in Psychology”, Philosophy of Science 61: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. Z. (1981), The Life of Vertebrates (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar