Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:22:29.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indeterminism and Epistemic Relativization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Wesley C. Salmon
Wesley C. Salmon*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carl G. Hempel's doctrine of essential epistemic relativization of inductive-statistical explanation seems to entail the unintelligibility of the notion of objective homogeneity of reference classes. This discussion note explores the question of whether, as a consequence, essential epistemic relativization also entails the unintelligibility of the doctrine of indeterminism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 199 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I should like to express my gratitude to the National Science Foundation for support of research on scientific explanation.

References

REFERENCES

Hempel, C. G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C., et al. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971.10.2307/j.ctt6wrd9pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. C. “Comments on ‘Hempel's Ambiguity’ by J. A. Coffa.” Synthese 28 (1974): 165–169.10.1007/BF00485233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. C. “Objectively Homogeneous Reference Classes.” Synthese 35, forthcoming.Google Scholar