Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:49:17.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Determinism Can Fail in Classical Physics and How Quantum Physics Can (Sometimes) Provide a Cure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

John Earman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various fault modes of determinism in classical physics are outlined. It is shown how quantum mechanics can cure some forms of classical indeterminism.

Type
The Vagaries of Determinism and Indeterminism
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 75 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2008 , pp. 817 - 829
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, D. (2007), “Losing Energy in Classical, Relativistic and Quantum Mechanics”, Losing Energy in Classical, Relativistic and Quantum Mechanics 38:170–180.Google Scholar
Belot, G., Earman, J., and Ruetsche, L. (1999), “The Hawking Information Loss Paradox: The Anatomy of a Controversy”, The Hawking Information Loss Paradox: The Anatomy of a Controversy 50:189–229.Google Scholar
Bojowald, M. (2001), “Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology”, Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology 86:5227–5230.Google ScholarPubMed
Brunnemann, J., and Thiemann, T. (2006), “On (Cosmological) Singularity Avoidance in Loop Quantum Gravity”, On (Cosmological) Singularity Avoidance in Loop Quantum Gravity 23:1395–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. (2007), “Aspects of Determinism in Modern Physics”, in Butterfield, J. and Earman, J. (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Physics. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (2008), “Essential Self-Adjointness: Implications for Determinism and the Classical Quantum Correspondence”, Synthese, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Earman, J., Smeenk, C., and Wüthrich, C. (2008), “Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of a Time Machine?”, Synthese, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, R., Joshi, P. S., and Singh, P. (2006), “Quantum Evaporation of a Naked Singularity”, Quantum Evaporation of a Naked Singularity 96: 031302.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, D., and Unruh, W. G. (2004), “Difficulties with Recollapsing Models in Closed Isotropic Loop Quantum Cosmology”, Difficulties with Recollapsing Models in Closed Isotropic Loop Quantum Cosmology 70: 103502.Google Scholar
Horowitz, G., and Marolf, G. (1995), “Quantum Probes of Spacetime Singularities”, Quantum Probes of Spacetime Singularities 52:5670–5675.Google ScholarPubMed
Ishibashi, A., and Wald, R. M. (2003), “Dynamics of Non-Globally-Hyperbolic Static Spacetimes II: General Analysis of Prescriptions for Dynamics”, Dynamics of Non-Globally-Hyperbolic Static Spacetimes II: General Analysis of Prescriptions for Dynamics 20:3815–3826.Google Scholar
Norton, John D. (1999), “A Quantum Mechanical Supertask”, A Quantum Mechanical Supertask 29:1265–1302.Google Scholar
Norton, John D. (2008), “The Dome: An Unexpectedly Simple Failure of Determinism,” Philosophy of Science 75, in this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Laraudogitia, J. (2007), “Supertasks, Dynamical Attractors and Indeterminism”, Supertasks, Dynamical Attractors and Indeterminism 38:724–731.Google Scholar
Rauch, J., and Reed, M. (1973), “Two Examples Illustrating the Differences between Classical and Quantum Mechanics”, Two Examples Illustrating the Differences between Classical and Quantum Mechanics 29:105–111.Google Scholar
Reed, M., and Simon, B. (1975), Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2, Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wald, R. M. (1980), “Dynamics in Nonglobally Hyperbolic, Static Spacetimes”, Dynamics in Nonglobally Hyperbolic, Static Spacetimes 21:2802–2805.Google Scholar
Wald, R. M. (1994), General Relativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar