Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:26:47.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health, Naturalism, and Functional Efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Daniel M. Hausman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay develops an account of health, the functional efficiency theory, which derives from Christopher Boorse's biostatistical theory (BST). Like the BST, the functional efficiency theory is a nonevaluative view of health, but unlike the BST, it argues that the fundamental theoretical task is to distinguish levels of efficiency with which the parts and processes within organisms and within systems within organisms function. Which of these to label as healthy or pathological is of secondary importance. Because the statistical distributions that Boorse's account relies on are distributions of functional efficiency, the functional efficiency theory arguably complements rather than challenges the BST.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 519 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I began this article during a delightful month in residence at the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, and I want to express my gratitude for the opportunity to visit there. This article owes an enormous debt to Christopher Boorse, Peter Schwartz, S. Andrew Schroeder, and Elliott Sober. I am also indebted to Martin Barrett, Hayley Clatterbuck, J. Paul Kelleher, Elselijn Kingma, Trever Pearce, Reuben Stern, Naftali Weinberger, and anonymous referees for this journal. I cannot blame any of these generous critics for the flaws that remain.

References

Amundson, Ron. 2000. “Against Normal Function.” Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M., eds. 2002. Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 1975. “On the Distinction between Disease and Illness.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 5:49–68.Google Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 1976. “Wright on Functions.” Philosophical Review 85:70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 1977. “Health as a Theoretical Concept.” Philosophy of Science 44:542–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 1987. “Concepts of Health.” In Health Care Ethics: An Introduction, ed. DeVeer, D. Van and Regan, T., 359–93. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 1997. “A Rebuttal on Health.” In What Is Disease? ed. Humber, J. M. and Almeder, R. F., 1–134. Totowa, NJ: Humana.Google Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 2002. “A Rebuttal on Functions.” In Ariew, Cummins, and Perlman 2002, 63–112.Google Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 2011. “Concepts of Health.” In Philosophy of Medicine, ed. Gifford, F., 13–64. Handbook of Philosophy of Science 16. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. 2002. “Disease.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 33:263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubos, René. 1965. Man Adapting. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. T. Jr. 1974. “The Disease of Masturbation: Values and the Concept of Disease.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48:234–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Ereshefsky, Marc. 2009. “Defining ‘Health’ and ‘Disease.’” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40:221–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, J. David. 2010. “On a Naturalist Theory of Health: A Critique.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41:272–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausman, Daniel. 2011. “Is an Overdose of Paracetamol Bad for One's Health?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62:57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingma, Elselijn. 2007. “What Is It to Be Healthy?” Analysis 67:128–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingma, Elselijn. 2010. “Paracetamol, Poison, and Polio: Why Boorse's Account of Function Fails to Distinguish Health and Disease.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61:241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mechanic, David. 1968. Medical Sociology: A Selective View. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Dominic. 2009. “Concepts of Disease and Health.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/health-disease/.Google Scholar
Nordenfelt, L. 1987. On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordenfelt, L.. 2001. Health, Science and Ordinary Language. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reznek, L. 1987. The Nature of Disease. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schroeder, S. Andrew. 2012. “Rethinking Health: Healthy or Healthier Than?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi:10.1093/bjps/axs006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Peter. 2007. “Defining Dysfunction: Natural Selection, Design, and Drawing a Line.” Philosophy of Science 74:364–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1996. Models of My Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1980. “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 47:350–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachbroit, Robert. 1994. “Normality as a Biological Concept.” Philosophy of Science 61:579–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, J. C. 1992. “The Concept of Mental Disorder: On the Boundary between Biological Facts and Social Values.” American Psychologist 47:373–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C.. 1999. “Evolutionary vs. Prototype Analyses of Disorder.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108:374–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, Jennifer, and Worrall, John. 2001. “Defining Disease: Much Ado about Nothing?” Analecta Husserliana 72:33–55.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. 1973. “Functions.” Philosophical Review 82:139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar