Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:05:10.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Generalized Selected Effects Theory of Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Justin Garson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I present and defend the generalized selected effects (GSE) theory of function. According to GSE, the function of a trait consists in the activity that contributed to its bearer’s differential reproduction, or differential retention, within a population. Unlike the traditional selected effects (SE) theory, it does not require that the functional trait helped its bearer reproduce; differential retention is enough. Although the core theory has been presented previously, I go significantly beyond those presentations by providing a new argument for GSE and defending it from a recent objection. I also sketch its implications for teleosemantics and philosophy of medicine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 523 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedau, Mark. 1991. “Can Biological Teleology Be Naturalized?” Journal of Philosophy 88:647–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric. 2008. “Causal Processes, Fitness, and the Differential Persistence of Lineages.” Philosophy of Science 75:560–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric 2013. “How Ecosystem Evolution Strengthens the Case for Function Pluralism.” In Function: Selection and Mechanisms, ed. Huneman, P., 83–95. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, Tim, et al. 2014. “The Function of Zebra Stripes.” Nature Communications 5:3535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Changeux, Jean-Pierre. 1997. “Variation and Selection in Neural Function.” Trends in Neurosciences 20:291–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Darden, Lindley, and Cain, Joseph A.. 1989. “Selection Type Theories.” Philosophy of Science 56:106–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lamberts, Ghislaine, and Dehaene, Stanislas. 1997. “In Defense of Learning by Selection: Neurobiological and Behavioral Evidence Revisited.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20:560–61.Google Scholar
Doolittle, W. Ford. 2014. “Natural Selection through Survival Alone, or the Possibility of Gaia.” Biology and Philosophy 29:415–23.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 1986. “Misrepresentation.” In Belief: Form, Content, and Function, ed. Bogdan, R., 17–36. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bogdan, R. 1988. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. 1987. Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elliott, Tyler A., Linquist, Stefan, and Gregory, T. Ryan. 2014. “Conceptual and Empirical Challenges to Ascribing Functions to Transposable Elements.” American Naturalist 184:14–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, Chrisantha, Szathmáry, Eörs, and Husbands, Phil. 2012. “Selectionist and Evolutionary Approaches to Brain Function: A Critical Appraisal.” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 6:1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garson, Justin. 2011. “Selected Effects Functions and Causal Role Functions in the Brain: The Case for an Etiological Approach to Neuroscience.” Biology and Philosophy 26:547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, Justin 2012. “Function, Selection, and Construction in the Brain.” Synthese 189:451–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, Justin 2015. The Biological Mind: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garson, Justin 2016. A Critical Overview of Biological Functions. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, Justin Forthcoming a. “Against Organizational Functions.” Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Garson, Justin Forthcoming b. “The Developmental Plasticity Challenge to Wakefield’s View.” In Defining Mental Disorder: Jerome Wakefield and His Critics, ed. L. Faucher and D. Forest. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Garson, Justin Forthcoming c. “How to Be a Function Pluralist.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Garson, Justin, and Piccinini, Gualtiero. 2014. “Functions Must Be Performed at Appropriate Rates in Appropriate Situations.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1992. “Indication and Adaptation.” Synthese 92:283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 1993. “Functions: Consensus without Unity.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74:196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. 1993. “Functional Analysis and Proper Function.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44:409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. 2006. “Function, Homology, and Character Individuation.” Philosophy of Science 73:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. 2011. “Is an Overdose of Paracetamol Bad for One’s Health?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62:657–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L., Langman, Rodney E., and Glenn, Sigrid S.. 2001. “A General Account of Selection: Biology, Immunology and Behavior.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:511–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Innocenti, Giorgio M., and Price, David J.. 2005. “Exuberance in the Development of Cortical Networks.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6:955–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, Eric R., et al. 2013. Principles of Neural Science. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kingma, Elselijn. 2010. “Paracetamol, Poison, and Polio: Why Boorse’s Account of Function Fails to Distinguish Health and Disease.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61:241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Justine. 2008. “Learning and Selection.” Biology and Philosophy 23:493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewens, Tim. 2004. Organisms and Artifacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. 1970. “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, John. 2015. “Defining Paradigm Darwinian Populations.” Philosophy of Science 82:178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. J. 2009. “Behavioral and Neural Darwinism: Selectionist Function and Mechanism in Adaptive Behavior Dynamics.” Behavioural Processes 84 (1): 358–65.Google ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, Peter. 2001. What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. 1989. “In Defense of Proper Functions.” Philosophy of Science 56:288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. 2009. “Populations as Individuals.” Biological Theory 4:267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossio, Matteo, Saborido, Cristian, and Moreno, Alvaro. 2009. “An Organizational Account for Biological Functions.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60:813–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, Karen. 1991. “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense.” Philosophy of Science 58:168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, Karen 1999. “Fitness and the Fate of Unicorns.” In Where Biology Meets Psychology, ed. Hardcastle, V. G., 3–26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, V. G. 2017. A Model of the Mental: In Defense of Informational Teleosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen, and Rosenberg, Alex. 2012. “Solving the Circularity Problem for Functions.” Journal of Philosophy 109:613–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David. 1984. “Representation and Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 51:550–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David 1987. Reality and Representation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Papineau, David 2017. “Teleosemantics.” In How Biology Shapes Philosophy: New Foundations for Naturalism, ed. Smith, D. L., 95–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Personius, Kirkwood E., Slusher, Barbara S., and Udin, Susan B.. 2016. “Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination.” Journal of Neuroscience 36:8783–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purves, Dale. 1994. Neural Activity and the Growth of the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Purves, Dale, White, Leonard E., and Riddle, David R.. 1996. “Is Neural Development Darwinian?” Trends in Neuroscience 19:460–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Quartz, Steven R., and Sejnowski, Terrence J.. 1997. “The Neural Basis of Cognitive Development: A Constructivist Manifesto.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20:537–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeke, George N. 2001. “Replication in Selective Systems: Multiplicity of Carriers, Variation of Information, Iteration of Encounters.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:552–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, Michael J., Klyubin, Igor, Cullen, William K., and Anwyl, Roger. 2003. “Synaptic Plasticity in Animal Models of Early Alzheimer’s Disease.” Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 358:821–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Ruse, Michael E. 1973. The Philosophy of Biology. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra. 2005. Molecular Models of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth F. 1993. Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlosser, Gerhard. 1998. “Self-Re-production and Functionality: A Systems-Theoretical Approach to Teleological Explanation.” Synthese 116:303–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekar, Aswin, et al. 2016. “Schizophrenia Risk from Complex Variation of Complement Component 4.” Nature 530:177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David S.. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turney, Stephen G., and Lichtman, Jeff W.. 2012. “Reversing the Outcome of Synapse Elimination at Developing Neuromuscular Junctions in Vivo: Evidence for Synaptic Competition and Its Mechanism.” PLoS Biology 10 (6): e1001352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, Jerome C. 1991. “The Concept of Mental Disorder: On the Boundary between Biological Facts and Social Values.” American Psychologist 47:373–88.Google Scholar
Weber, Marcel. 2005. Philosophy of Experimental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiesel, Torsten N., and Hubel, David H.. 1963. “Single-Cell Responses in Striate Cortex of Kittens Deprived of Vision in One Eye.” Journal of Neurophysiology 26:1003–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimsatt, William C. 1972. “Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3:1–80.Google Scholar
Witten, Ilana B., et al. 2011. “Recombinase-Driver Rat Lines: Tools, Techniques, and Optogenetic Application to Dopamine-Mediated Reinforcement.” Neuron 72:721–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Rachel, and Lichtman, Jeff W.. 2002. “Synapse Elimination.” In Fundamental Neuroscience, 2nd ed., ed. Squire, L. R., Bloom, F. E., McConnell, S. K., Roberts, J. L., Spitzer, N. C., and Zigmond, M. J., 533–54. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wouters, Arno G. 2013. “Biology’s Functional Perspective: Roles, Advantage, and Organization.” In The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators, ed. Kampourakis, K., 455–86. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. 1973. “Functions.” Philosophical Review 82:139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar