Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:56:30.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Essay Review of The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

John Wettersten
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I. C. Jarvie interprets Popper's philosophy of science as a theory of the institution of science, explains how the social aspect of his theory developed, and suggests that an updated version of Popper's social theory should be used to study both scientific and nonscientific societies today. Although (1) Jarvie's description of the emergence of Popper's theory suffers because he takes no account Popper's research conducted before Logik der Forschung (1994), (2) his portrayal of Popper's framework overlooks important problems, and (3) his program is by no means new, his essay throws light on the relation between Popper's philosophy of science, his social theory, and his social studies of science.

Type
Essay Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 108 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassi, Joseph (1963), Towards an Historiography of Science, History and Theory. Studies in the Philosophy of History. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Agassi, Joseph (1975), Science in Flux. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassi, Joseph (1977), Towards a Rational Philosophical Anthropology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassi, Joseph (1981), Science and Society. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Agassi, Joseph (1985), Technology: Philosophical and Social Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Agassi, Joseph (1999), Liberal Nationalism for Israel. Jerusalem: Gefen.Google Scholar
Agassi, Joseph (2003), Science and Culture. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Anita L., and Regan, Milton C. Jr., eds. (1998), Debating Democracy’s Discontent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Gunnar ([1988] 1994), Kritik und Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Kuhns, Lakatos’ and Feyerabends Kritik des Kritischen Realismus. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. English edition: Criticism and the History of Science. London: Brill.Google Scholar
Berkson, William, and Wettersten, John (1984), Learning from Error. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest (1994), Conditions of Liberty. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Hall, John A., and Jarvie, I. C., eds. (1996), The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1960), The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1962a), The Open Society and Its Enemies, 4th ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1962b), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1979), Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1994), Die Logik der Forschung. Zehnte Auflage. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. (1996), Democracy’s Discontent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shearmur, Jeremy (1980), “The Religious Sect as a Cognitive System”, The Religious Sect as a Cognitive System 4:149–163.Google Scholar
Shearmur, Jeremy (1995), Karl Popper’s Politics: Liberalism versus Democratic Socialism. St. Leonards, NSW: Centre for Independent Studies.Google Scholar
Shearmur, Jeremy (1996), The Political Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1974), “Methods in Psychology: A Critical Case Study of Pavlov”, Methods in Psychology: A Critical Case Study of Pavlov 4:17–34.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1975), “The Historiography of Scientific Psychology: A Critical Study”, The Historiography of Scientific Psychology: A Critical Study 11:157–171.Google ScholarPubMed
Wettersten, John (l978), “Stability versus Change in Psychological Research: Towards Improved Standards in Psychological Journals”, in Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of Scientific Editors. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 485–494.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (l979), “Against Competence: Towards Improved Standards of Evaluation of Science and Technology”, Against Competence: Towards Improved Standards of Evaluation of Science and Technology 1:245–256.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (l980), “Procrustean Beds of Scientific Style”, Procrustean Beds of Scientific Style 36:97–116.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (l982), “Schrittweise Rationalität als Theorie uber den Menschen” (review of Towards a Rational Philosophical Anthropology by Joseph Agassi), Grazer Philosophische Studien 15:163–174.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (l985a), “On Conservative and Adventurous Styles of Scientific Research”, On Conservative and Adventurous Styles of Scientific Research 23:443–463.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1985b), “New Methods for the Study of Man” (review of Towards a Rational Philosophical Anthropology by Joseph Agassi), Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16:167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettersten, John (1985c), “The Road through Würzburg, Vienna and Gottingen” (review of Die Beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie by Karl Popper), Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15:487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettersten, John (l987a), “On Two Non-justificationist Moves”, On Two Non-justificationist Moves 49:419–421.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1987b), “Achievement and Autonomy in Intellectual Society”, Achievement and Autonomy in Intellectual Society 17:55–75.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (l987c), “New Problems of Technology: A Comprehensive Analysis” (review of Technology, Philosophical and Social Aspects by Joseph Agassi), Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 18:322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettersten, John (1988), “Külpe, Bühler, Popper”, in Eschbach, Achim (ed.), Karl Bühler's Theory of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettersten, John (1991), “The Fleck Affair: Fashions versus Heritage”, The Fleck Affair: Fashions versus Heritage 34:475–498.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1992a), The Roots of Critical Rationalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1992b), “On Aspiring to Belong To”, On Aspiring to Belong To 23:37–59.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1993), “The Sociology of Scientific Establishments Today”, The Sociology of Scientific Establishments Today 44:68–102.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1995a), “Braucht die Wissenschaft methdologische Regeln?”, Braucht die Wissenschaft methdologische Regeln? 73:255–270.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1995b), “Styles of Rationality”, Styles of Rationality 25:69–98.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (1996), “Eine aktuelle Aufgabe für den kritischen Rationalismus und die Soziologie”, in Wendel, Hans-Jürgen and Gadenne, Volker (eds.), Kritik und Rationalität. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 183–212.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (2005), “New Insights on Young Popper”, New Insights on Young Popper 66:603–631.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (2006), How Do Institutions Steer Events? An Inquiry into the Limits and Possibilities of Rational Thought and Action. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wettersten, John (forthcoming), “Towards a New Theory of the Closed Society”, in Miller, David and Jarvie, I. C. (eds.), Proceedings of Popper 2002. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar