Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:33:55.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embedded Mechanisms and Phylogenetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Lucas J. Matthews
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A strong case has been made for the role and value of mechanistic explanation in neuroscience and molecular biology. A similar demonstration in other domains of scientific investigation, however, remains an important challenge of scope for the new mechanists. This article helps answer that challenge by demonstrating one valuable role mechanisms play in phylogenetics. Using the transition/transversion (ti/tv) rate parameter as a case example, this article argues that models embedded with mechanisms produce stronger phylogenetic tree hypotheses, as measured by maximum likelihood logL values. Two important implications for the new mechanistic account of explanation are considered.

Type
Biology
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 82 , Issue 5 , December 2015 , pp. 1116 - 1126
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechtel, William. 2006. Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William 2008. Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William, and Abrahamsen, Adele. 2005. “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C 36 (2): 421–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, William, and Richardson, Robert C.. 1993/1993. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Repr. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Daniel R. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior: A Research Program in Comparative Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. 2007. Explaining the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl F., and Alexandrova, Anna. 2008. “No Revolution Necessary: Neural Mechanisms for Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 24:381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl F., and Tabery, James G.. Forthcoming. “Mechanisms.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis H. C. 1966. “Codon—Anticodon Pairing: The Wobble Hypothesis.” Journal of Molecular Biology 19 (2): 548–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darden, Lindley. 2006. Reasoning in Biological Discoveries: Essays On Mechanism, Interfield Relations, and Anomaly Resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, Joseph. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Fisher, Ronald A. 1922. “On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 222:309–68.Google Scholar
Freese, Ernst. 1959. “The Specific Mutagenic Effect of Base Analogues on Phage {T4}. Journal of Molecular Biology 1 (2): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Matthew H. 2009. “Phylogenetic Inference.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, ed. Tucker, Aviezer, no. 41 in Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, chap. 20, 231–42. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, Paul H., and Pagel, Mark D.. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution 1. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Paul H., and Paul, Sean N.. 1994. “Phylogenetic Epidemiology Lives.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9 (10): 361–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedström, Peter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, Peter, and Ylikoski, Petri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, John P., and Crandall, Keith A.. 1997. “Phylogeny Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Using Maximum Likelihood.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:437–66.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illari, Phyllis M. 2013. “Mechanistic Explanation: Integrating the Ontic and Epistemic.” Erkenntnis 78 (2): 237–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illari, Phyllis M., and Williamson, Jon. 2012. “What Is a Mechanism? Thinking about Mechanisms across the Sciences.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1): 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, Ravi R., Pluciennik, Anna, Burdett, Vickers, and Modrich, Paul L.. 2006. “DNA Mismatch Repair: Functions and Mechanisms.” Chemical Reviews 106 (2): 302–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jukes, Thomas H., and Cantor, Charles R.. 1969. “Evolution of Protein Molecules.” Mammalian Protein Metabolism 3:21–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Irene, Bensasson, Douda, and Nichols, Richard A.. 2007. “Transition-Transversion Bias Is Not Universal: A Counter Example from Grasshopper Pseudogenes.” PLOS Genetics 3 (2): e22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Motoo. 1980. “A Simple Method for Estimating Evolutionary Rates of Base Substitutions through Comparative Studies of Nucleotide Sequences.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolodner, Richard D. 1995. “Mismatch Repair: Mechanisms and Relationship to Cancer Susceptibility.” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 20 (10): 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, Arnon. 2013. “Three Kinds of New Mechanism.” Biology and Philosophy 28 (1): 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F.. 2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, L. 2012. “Is Philosophy of Mechanism Philosophy Enough?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C 43 (1): 164–72.Google Scholar
Ou, Chinyi, et al. 1992. “Molecular Epidemiology of HIV Transmission in a Dental Practice.” Science 256 (5060): 1165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pray, Leslie. 2008. “DNA Replication and Causes of Mutation.” Nature Education 1 (1): 214.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Jeffry L. 2008. “Mechanisms and Their Explanatory Challenges in Organic Chemistry.” Philosophy of Science 75 (5): 970–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliot. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strevens, Michael. 2008. Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tabery, James G. 2014. Beyond Versus: The Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, Paul. 2010. “Mechanism, Reduction, and Emergence in Two Stories of the Human Epistemic Enterprise.” Erkenntnis 73 (3): 413–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, Paul. 2006. Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco, Joel D. 2013. “Philosophy and Phylogenetics.” Philosophy Compass 8 (10): 990–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James. 2013. “Mechanistic Explanation: Its Scope and Limits.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1): 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar