Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:25:14.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Descent Systems and Ideal Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Rodney Needham
Rodney Needham*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1960 , pp. 96 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 by Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gellner, Ernest: “Ideal language and kinship structure,” Philosophy of Science, 24, 1957, pp. 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Malinowski, Bronislaw: A Scientific Theory of Culture, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1944.Google Scholar
3. Hocart, A. M.: “Kinship systems,” Anthropos, 32, 1937, pp. 545-551. (Reprinted in The Life-Giving Myth, London 1952.)Google Scholar
4. Dumont, Louis: “The Dravidian kinship terminology as an expression of marriage,” Man, 53, 1953, pp. 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Leach, E. R.: “Concerning Trobriand clans and the kinship category 'tabu',” Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology, 1, 1958, pp. 120–145.Google Scholar
6. Needham, Rodney: “A structural analysis of Purum society,” American Anthropologist, 60, 1958, pp. 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gellner, Ernest: “Time and theory in social anthropology,” Mind, 67, 1958, pp. 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar