Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:36:22.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discrete State Systems, Markov Chains, and Problems in the Theory of Scientific Explanation and Prediction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Nicholas Rescher
Nicholas Rescher*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent discussions in the philosophy of science have devoted considerable attention to the analysis of conceptual issues relating to the methodology of explanation and prediction in the sciences. Part of this literature has been devoted to clarifying the very ideas of explanation and prediction. But the discussion has also ranged over various related topics, including the status of laws to be used for explanatory and predictive purposes, the logical interrelationships between explanatory and predictive reasonings, the differences in the strategy of explanatory argumentation in different branches of science, the nature and possibility of teleological explanation, etc. The aim of the present article is to examine the issues involved in such questions from the specialized perspective afforded by one particular kind of physical systems—namely, systems, here to be characterized as discrete state systems, whose behavior has been studied extensively in the scientific literature under the general heading of Markov chains. These systems have been chosen as our focus because their behavior over time can be analyzed at once with great ease and with extraordinary precision.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1963 , pp. 325 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker (1957). Barker, S. F. Induction and Hypothesis. Ithaca, 1957.Google Scholar
Barker (1961). Barker, S. F. “The Role of Simplicity in Explanation.” Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science (ed. H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), N.Y., 1961, and the “Comments” on this paper by W. Salmon, P. Feyerabend and R. Rudner, with Barker's “Rejoinders” thereto.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, (1953). Braithwaite, R. B. Scientific Explanation. Cambridge, 1953.Google Scholar
Carnap, (1950). Carnap, Rudolf. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, 1950.Google Scholar
Grünbaum (1962). Grünbaum, Adolf. “Temporally-Asymmetric Principles, Parity Between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism versus Teleology.” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 29 (1962), pp. 146–170.10.1086/287858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, (1959). Hanson, Norwood R. “On the Symmetry Between Explanation and Prediction.” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 68 (1959), pp. 349–358.10.2307/2182567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, and Oppenheim, (1948). Hempel, Carl G. and Oppenheim, Paul. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 15 (1948), pp. 135–175.10.1086/286983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, (1962). Hempel, Carl G. “Deductive-Nomological versus Statistical Explanation,” in H. Feigl et al. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3 (Minneapolis, 1962).Google Scholar
Nagel, (1960). Nagel, Ernest. The Structure of Science. New York, 1961.Google Scholar
Popper, (1959). Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, 1959.Google Scholar
Rescher, (1958). Rescher, Nicholas. “On Prediction and Explanation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8 (1958), pp. 281–290.10.1093/bjps/VIII.32.281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, (1957). Scheffler, I. “Explanation, Prediction, and Abstraction.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7 (1957), pp. 293–309.10.1093/bjps/VII.28.293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriven, (1958). Scriven, Michael. “Definitions, Explanations, and Theories,” in H. Feigl, M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2 (Minneapolis, 1958), pp. 99–195.Google Scholar
Scriven, (1962). Scriven, Michael. “Explanations, Predictions, and Laws” in H. Feigl et al. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3 (Minneapolis, 1962).Google Scholar