Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
In this paper, I offer a proof that a disastrous conclusion (namely, that any observation report confirms any hypothesis) may be derived directly from two principles of qualitative confirmation which Carl Hempel called the “Converse Consequence Condition” and the “Entailment Condition.” I then discuss three strategies which a defender of the Converse Consequence Condition may deploy to save this principle.
Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, 541 Hall of Languages, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244.
Thanks to Karen Jackson, Brent Mundy, the Editor, and an anonymous referee of this journal for helpful comments and suggestions.