Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:50:41.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Concept of Measurement and Time Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

M. Bitbol*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de biorhéologie et d'hydrodynamique physico-chimique (laboratoire associé au C.N.R.S.). Université Paris 7
*
Present address: Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris

Abstract

The formal time symmetry of the quantum measurement process is extensively discussed. Then, the origin of the alleged association between a fixed temporal direction and quantum measurements is investigated. It is shown that some features of such an association might arise from epistemological rather than purely physical assumptions. In particular, it is brought out that a sequence of statements bearing on quantum measurements may display intrinsic asymmetric properties, irrespective of the location of corresponding measurements in time t of the Schrödinger equation. The situation of an observer performing two measurements in two opposite directions of t is eventually investigated. Essential differences are found between two descriptions of this situation: the internal one (taking only into account what is recorded in the observer's memory) and the external one (whereby the observer is considered as a quantum system ruled by the Schrödinger equation). Finally, a method allowing several observers to establish a correspondence between their memory sizes is analyzed. The most important facts that usually lead to the associating of a preferential temporal direction with quantum measurements may be inferred from this correspondence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Professor B. d'Espagnat for his thorough suggestions concerning the content of this article.

References

REFERENCES

Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., and Lebowitz, J. L. (1964), “Time Asymmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement”, Physical Review B, 134: 14101416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitbol, M. (1983), “An Analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations in Terms of Events”, Physics Letters A, 96: 6670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitbol, M. (1986), “Time Symmetry and Quantum Measurements”, Physics Letters A, 115: 357362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa de Beauregard, O. (1963), Le Second Principe de la Science du Temps. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Cramer, J. G. (1983), “The Arrow of Electromagnetic Time and the Generalized Absorber Theory”, Foundations of Physics 13: 887902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneri, A., Loinger, A., and Prosperi, G. M. (1962), “Quantum Theory of Measurements and Ergodicity Conditions”, Nuclear Physics 33: 297319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. C. W. (1977), The Physics of Time Asymmetry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1974), “An Attempt to Add a Little Direction to ‘the Problem of the Direction of Time‘”, Philosophy of Science 41: 1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Espagnat, B. (1976), Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading, Mass.: Benjamin.Google Scholar
d'Espagnat, B. (1985), Une Incertaine Réalité. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Everett, H. (1957), “‘Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics”, Review of Modern Physics 29: 454462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, H. (1974), “The Theory of the Universal Wave-Function”, in B. S. De Witt and N. Graham (eds.), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3140.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. W. (1914), Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Healey, R. (1981), “Statistical Theories, Quantum Mechanics and the Directedness of Time”, in R. Healey (ed.), Reduction, Time and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, L., and Lifschitz, E. (1967), Physique Statistique. Moscow: Mir.Google Scholar
London, F., and Bauer, E. (1939), “The Theory of Observation in Quantum Mechanics”, in J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement (1983). Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 217259.Google Scholar
Mehlberg, H. (1980), “Time in a Quantized Universe”, in R. S. Cohen (ed.), Time, Causality and the Quantum Theory. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 19. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 1292.Google Scholar
Messiah, A. (1960), Mécanique Quantique. Vol. 2. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Partovi, H. (1983), “Entropic Formulation of Uncertainty for Quantum Measurements”, Physical Review Letters 50: 18831885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1980), Time, Being and Becoming. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, F. (1965), Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill; Kogakusha.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, L. (1965), “The Measuring Process in Quantum Mechanics”, Progress in Theoretical Physics (Supplement): 222231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1950), “Irreversibility”, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 53: 189195. Also in P. T. Landsberg (ed.), The Enigma of Time. Bristol: Adam-Hilger, pp. 46–52.Google Scholar
Ter-Haar, D. (1955), “Foundations of Statistical Mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 27: 289338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1955), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, S. (1955), “Symmetry of Physical Laws I, II, and III”, Reviews of Modern Physics 27: 26186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeh, H. D. (1979), “Quantum Theory and Time Asymmetry”, Foundations of Physics 9: 803818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar