Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:03:44.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on “Studies in The Logic of Explanation”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

David L. MILLER
David L. MILLER*
Affiliation:
University of Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I want to commend the article, “Studies in the Logic of Explanation,” Philosophy of Science, April, 1948, by Hempel and Oppenheim. However, there are two points in the article that have been treated in a manner incompatible with the general attitude taken by the authors and, I believe, they are mistaken in these two rather essential matters. The first concerns the relationship between emergents and prediction. The second concerns the relationship between “evidence” or sense data and law.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1948 , pp. 348 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See my article, “The Meaning of Evolution,” American Scientist, Vol. 34, No. 2, April, 1946.