Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:00:15.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Clock Paradox and Thermodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Philip Rosen*
Affiliation:
Hasbrouck Physics Laboratory, University of Massachusetts

Abstract

The twin paradox of relativity theory is reviewed. A distinction is made between physical clocks and biological ones. It is suggested that metabolic activity might be a better measure of aging than physical time. Further it is suggested that entropy changes representing metabolic activity would be a good way to describe aging. Using the above criterion it appears that a traveling twin will be older than his brother.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 by Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Landau, L. and Lifshitz, E.: The Classical Theory of Fields, Addison Wesley Press Inc., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
2. Synge, J. L. and Griffith, B. A.: Principles of Mechanics, Page 492, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
3. Moller, C.: The Theory of Relativity, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1952).Google Scholar
4. Born, M. and Biem, W.: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akad. Van Wetenschappen, 61 B 110 (1958).Google Scholar
5. Nettleship, A.: Nature, 181, 562 (1958).10.1038/181562a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Goodhart, C. B.: Discovery, 18, 519 (1957).Google Scholar
7. Degroot, S. R.: Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Interscience Inc., New York.Google Scholar
8. Prigogine, I. and Wiame, J. M.: Experientia (Basle), 2, 451 (1946).Google Scholar
9. Tolman, R. C.: Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar