Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:27:55.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Background Theories and Total Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

P. D. Magnus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background theories in science are used both to prove and to disprove that theory choice is underdetermined by data. The alleged proof appeals to the fact that experiments to decide between theories typically require auxiliary assumptions from other theories. If this generates a kind of underdetermination, it shows that standards of scientific inference are fallible and must be appropriately contextualized. The alleged disproof appeals to the possibility of suitable background theories to show that no theory choice can be timelessly or noncontextually underdetermined: Foreground theories might be distinguished against different backgrounds. Philosophers have often replied to such a disproof by focussing their attention not on theories but on Total Sciences. If empirically equivalent Total Sciences were at stake, then there would be no background against which they could be differentiated. I offer several reasons to think that Total Science is a philosophers’ fiction. No respectable underdetermination can be based on it.

Type
Realism and Underdetermination
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 1064 - 1075
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, Richard N. (1982), “Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology”, in Giere, Ronald and Asquith, Peter (eds.), PSA 1980: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 613–662.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copi, Irving M., and Cohen, Carl (1990), Introduction to Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M. (1985), “The Ontological Status of Observables: In Praise of the Superempirical Virtues”, in Churchland, Paul M. and Hooker, Clifford A. (eds.), Images of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 35–47.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M. (1989), A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre ([1916] 1954), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Reprint. Translated by P. P. Wiener. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Originally published as La théorie physique: Son objet, et sa structure. Paris: Marcel Rivière.Google Scholar
Dupré, John (1983), “The Disunity of Science”, The Disunity of Science 92:321–346.Google Scholar
Dupré, John (1996), “Metaphysical Disorder and Scientific Disunity”, in Galison, Peter and Stump, David J. (eds.,) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Context, and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 101–117.Google Scholar
Earman, John (1993), “Underdetermination, Realism, and Reason”, Underdetermination, Realism, and Reason 18:19–38.Google Scholar
Farber, Ilya (2000), “Domain Integration: A Theory of Progress in the Scientific Understanding of the Life and Mind.” PhD dissertation. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter, and Stump, David J., eds. (1996), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Context, and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1996), “The Disunities of the Sciences”, in Peter Galison and David J. Stump (eds.,) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Context, and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 37–74.Google Scholar
Hoefer, Carl, and Rosenberg, Alexander (1994), “Empirical Equivalence, Underdetermination, and Systems of the World”, Empirical Equivalence, Underdetermination, and Systems of the World 61:592–607.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993), The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kourany, Janet A. (2003), “Reply to Giere”, Reply to Giere 90:22–26.Google Scholar
Kukla, André (1996), “Does Every Theory Have Empirically Equivalent Rivals?”, Does Every Theory Have Empirically Equivalent Rivals? 44:137–166.Google Scholar
Kukla, André (1998), Studies in Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Laurens (1965), “Grünbaum on ‘the Duhemian Argument’”, Grünbaum on ‘the Duhemian Argument’ 32:295–299.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1998), “Underdetermination”, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry, and Leplin, Jarrett (1991), “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination”, Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination 88:449–472.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen (1990), Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, P. D. (2003), “Underdetermination and the Claims of Science.” PhD dissertation. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D. (2005a), “Peirce: Underdetermination, Agnosticism, and Related Mistakes”, Peirce: Underdetermination, Agnosticism, and Related Mistakes 48:26–37.Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D. (2005b), “Reckoning the Shape of Everything: Underdetermination and Cosmotopology”, Reckoning the Shape of Everything: Underdetermination and Cosmotopology 56:541–557.Google Scholar
Norton, John D. (2003), “A Material Theory of Induction”, A Material Theory of Induction 70:647–670.Google Scholar
Quine, Quine Willard van (1953), “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 20–46.Google Scholar