Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:10:59.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alexander Rosenberg, Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press (1980), xi + 227 pp., $16.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Edward P. Stabler Jr.*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, N., ed. (1980), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Volume 1. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, A. L. (1980), “Have species become déclassé?” Asquith, P. and Giere, R. (eds.), PSA 1980, vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Caplan, A.L. (1981), “Back to class: a note on the ontology of species”, Philosophy of Science, 48: 130140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959), Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner, Language, 35: 2658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1976), “Are species really individuals?Systematic Zoology, 25: 174191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1978), “A matter of individuality”, Philosophy of Science, 45: 335360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1981), “Kitts and Kitts and Caplan on species”, Philosophy of Science, 48: 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitts, D. B. and Kitts, D. J. (1979), “Biological species as natural kinds”, Philosophy of Science, 46: 613622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1980), “Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism”, Philosophy of Science, 47: 350383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975), Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar