Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:05:19.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is a Consultative Referendum? The Democratic Legitimacy of Popular Consultations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2020

Carlo Invernizzi Accetti Open the ORCID record for Carlo Invernizzi Accetti [Opens in a new window]  and
Giulia Oskian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the democratic legitimacy of popular referendums asking whether they should be understood as bypassing or complementing representative institutions. To answer this question, we focus on the distinction between legislative referendums and consultative ones, noting that even though referendums of the latter kind are by far more prevalent from an empirical point of view, their specific role in democratic decision-making remains under-theorized in the existing literature. We therefore focus on consultative referendums as a possible way of reconciling the referendum procedure with representative democracy. First, we clarify the specific conception of representative democracy that underscores our study; second, we develop the idea that consultative referendums are to be understood to specify the political mandate of elected representatives; finally, we apply the results of this conceptual work to the case of the Greek bailout and the Brexit referendums, aiming to dispel some lingering misconceptions concerning the normative implications of their results and thereby clarifying the normative significance of our theory.

Type
Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 123 - 138
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

They express their gratitude to Chris Bickerton, Lisa Disch, Maria Paula Saffon, and Nadia Urbinati. Discussions with the authors on an early draft of the manuscript and their comments revealed a deeper understanding of consultative referendums. They would also like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for the journal, whose suggestions were an excellent guide to the final revision of the manuscript.

References

Abts, Koen, and Rummens, Stefan. 2007. “Populism versus Democracy.” Political Studies 55(2): 405-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Dewey. 1942. Government Directly by the People. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968. “What Is Authority?” In Between Past and Future. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Arnesen, Sveinung, Brodestad, Troy, Johannesson, Mikael, and Linde, Jonas. 2019. “Conditional Legitimacy: How Turnout, Majority Size, and Outcome Affect Perceptions of Legitimacy in European Union Membership Referendums.” European Union Politics 20(2): 176-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Associated Press. 2019. “3 Years of Brexit Promises in Theresa May's Own Words—from 'Brexit Means Brexit' to 'I Won't Stand in the Way.”’ (https://www.businessinsider.com/theresa-may-in-quotes-from-brexit-means-brexit-to-i-quit-2019-3?IR=T).Google Scholar
Aubert, Jean-François. 1972. “Le Référendum Populaire.” Revue de Droit Suisse 1(1): 481-506.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56(4): 947-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. 2018a. “Majority Rule, Compromise and the Democratic Legitimacy of Referendums.” Swiss Political Science Review 24(3): 312-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. 2018b. “Was the Brexit Referendum Legitimate and Would a Second One Be So?” European Political Science 18(1): 126-33.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 1999. Teoria Generale della Politica. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto 2013 [1988]. Liberalism and Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. 1981. The People and the Party System: The Referendum and Electoral Reform in British Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin, eds. 1978. Referendums. A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Ranney, Austin, eds. 1994. Referendums around the World. The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David. 2013. “The UK and the EU.” Speech delivered in the British House of Commons, January 22. (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-21158316).Google Scholar
Canetti, Elias. 2000 [1962]. Crowds and Power. London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2001. Constitutional Referendums and Democratic Deliberation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2018. “Making Referendums Safe for Democracy: A Call for More and Better Deliberation.” Swiss Political Science Review 24(3): 305-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheneval, Francis, and el-Wakil, Alice. 2018. “The Institutional Design of Referendums: Bottom-Up and Binding.” Swiss Political Science Review 24(3): 294-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert 1986. “Power as the Control of Behavior.” In Power, ed. Lukes, Steven. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dicey, Albert Venn. 1890. “Ought the Referendum to be Introduced into England?” Contemporary Review.Google Scholar
el-Wakil, Alice, and McKay, Spencer. 2019. “Disentangling Referendums and Direct Democracy: A Defence of the Systemic Approach to Popular Vote.” Representation. August 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1652203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espejo Ochoa, Paulina. 2011. The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Finer, Herman. 1949. Theory and Practice of Modern Government. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Folkestad, Bjarte, Klausen, Jan Erling, Saglie, Jo, and Seegard, Signe Bock. 2019. “When Do Consultative Referendums Improve Democracy? Evidence from Local Referendums in Norway.” International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119881810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault—Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, ed. Dreyfus, Hubert and Rabinow, Paul. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno. 1992. “Efficiency and Democratic Political Organization: The Case for the Referendum.” Journal of Public Policy 12(3): 210-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 2001. Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gökhan Şen, Ilker. 2018. “Sovereignty Referendums: People Concerned and People Entitled to Vote.” In The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy , ed. Morel, Laurence and Qvortrup, Matt. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, and Saward, Michael. 2005. “Dog Whistles and Democratic Mandates.” The Political Quarterly 76:471-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy ? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David. 1987. Models of Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jäske, Maija. 2017. “‘Soft’ Forms of Direct Democracy: Explaining the Occurrence of Referendum Motions and Advisory Referendums in Finnish Local Government.” Swiss Political Science Review 23(1): 50-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäske, Maija, and Setälä, Maija. 2019. “A Functionalist Approach to Democratic Innovations.” Representation, November 24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1691639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Nevil. 1981. “Types of Referendum.” In The Referendum Device , ed. Ranney, Austin. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Kazamias, Alexander. 2015. “Syriza Betrayed Its Principles—and the Greek People. Its Days are Numbered.” The Guardian, July 5.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 2013 [1929]. The Essence and Value of Democracy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1955. “Foundations of Democracy.” Ethics 66:1-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouvelakis, Stathis. 2016. “Syriza’s Rise and Fall.” New Left Review 97:45-70.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène. 2018. “Referendums Are Never Merely Referendums: On the Need to Make Popular Vote Processes More Deliberative.” Swiss Political Science Review 24(3): 320-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy. Referendums in Global Perspective. Peterborough: Broadview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Matsusaka, John. 2004. “Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7:463-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Christiano, Thomas, Fung, Archon, Parkinson, John, Thompson, Dennis, and Warren, Mark. 2012. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morel, Laurence. 2018a. “Types of Referendums, Provisions and Practice at the National Level Worldwide.” In The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy , ed. Morel, Laurence and Qvortrup, Matt. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morel, Laurence. 2018b. “The Democratic Ciriticism of Referendums: The Majority and True Will of the People.” In The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy , ed. Morel, Laurence and Qvortrup, Matt. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morel, Laurence, and Qvortrup, Matt, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mosca, Gaetano. 1959. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism ? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39(4): 541-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary . 2019. (www.oed.com).Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 2017. “Referendum vs. Institutionalized Deliberation: What Democratic Theorists Can Learn from the 2016 Brexit Decision.” Daedalus 146(3): 14-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy’’s Value, ed. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Matt, ed. 2014. Referendums Around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Matt. 2018. Government by Referendum. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968 [1762]. The Social Contract. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1988 [1923]. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2004 [1932]. Legality and Legitimacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Setala, Maija.1999. Referendums and Democratic Government. Normative Theory and Analysis of Institutions. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, Clifford. 1911. The Case Against the Referendum. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
Smith, Gordon. 1975. “The Referendum and Political Change.” Government and Opposition 10(3): 294-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachey, John. 1924. The Referendum. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Taillon, Patrick. 2012. Le Référendum: Expression Directe de la Volonté Populiare ? Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Talleyrand, Charles Maurice. 1875[1789]. “Speech at the Assemblée Nationale Constituante.”’ July 7–9. In Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860: recueil complet des débats législatifs et politiques des chambres françaises. Paris: Librairie Administrative de Paul Dupont,Google Scholar
Tierney, Stephen. 2012. Constitutional Referendums. The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2016. The Sleeping Sovereign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, and Saffon, Maria-Paula. 2013. “Procedural Democracy, the Bulwark of Equal Liberty.” Political Theory 41(3): 441-81.Google Scholar
Walter, Stefanie, Dinas, Elias, Jurado, Ignacio, and Konstantinidis, Nikita. 2018. “Noncooperation by Popular Vote: Expectations, Foreign Intervention, and the Vote in the 2015 Greek Bailout Referendum.” International Organization 72(4): 721-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark. 2017. “A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111(1): 39-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar