Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:44:49.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State, Power, Anarchism

A Discussion of The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Stephen D. Krasner
Stephen D. Krasner
Affiliation:
Freeman Spogli Institute and Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. By James C. Scott. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. 464p. $35.00.

The book under discussion is James C. Scott's latest contribution to the study of agrarian politics, culture, and society, and to the ways that marginalized communities evade or resist projects of state authority. The book offers a synoptic history of Upland Southeast Asia, a 2.5 million–kilometer region of hill country spanning Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Burma, and China. It offers a kind of “area study.” It also builds on Scott's earlier work on “hidden transcripts” of subaltern groups and on “seeing like a state.” The book raises many important theoretical questions about research methods and social inquiry, the relationship between political science and anthropology, the nature of states, and of modernity more generally. The book is also deeply relevant to problems of “state-building” and “failed states” in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia. As Scott writes, “The huge literature on state-making, contemporary and historic, pays virtually no attention to its obverse: the history of deliberate and reactive statelessness. This is the history of those who got away, and state-making cannot be understood apart from it. This is also what makes it an anarchist history” (p. x).

In this symposium, I have invited a number of prominent political and social scientists to comment on the book, its historical narrative, and its broader theoretical implications for thinking about power, state failure, state-building, and foreign policy. How does the book shed light on the limits of states and the modes of resistance to state authority? Are there limits, theoretical and normative, to this “anarchist” understanding of governance and the “art of being governed”?

—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor

Type
Review Symposium: State, Power, Anarchism
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 79 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert C. 1997. “Agriculture and the Origins of the State in Ancient Egypt.” Explorations in Economic History 34: 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. State Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2009. “How Development Leads to Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 88 (2): 33–48.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (March): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Adrienne. 2010. The Poison King: The Life and Legend of Mithradates, Rome's Deadliest Enemy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallace, John Joseph, and Weingast, Barry R.. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1889. Democracy in America. Henry Reeve translation. Available at http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/1_ch08.htm.Google Scholar
United States Embassy, Kabul, and United States Forces, Afghanistan. 2009. The United States Government Integrated Civilian-Military Campaign Plan for Support to Afghanistan. Available at http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/0908eikenberryandmcchrystal.pdf.Google Scholar