Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T16:00:31.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State of Insecurity: The Trial of Job and Secular Political Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2008

Keally McBride
Keally McBride
Affiliation:
University of San Francisco ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thomas Hobbes observed that the human mind seeks causality in order to propagate good fortune or avoid disaster. However, events occur that cannot be linked to direct causes, leading human beings to invent beliefs and other mechanisms to produce a system of order and probability that can be applied to the seemingly random universe. Examining the relationship between Hobbes and the Book of Job reveals the failure of religion to provide for perfectly comprehensible causality since Job is forced to accept that God works in ways that he cannot understand in delivering rewards and punishments. Hobbes offers secular political order as an alternative that will conform to the structure of human reason. The attempt to order the universe is always incomplete, yet it is this lack of control that helps us to understand the inspiration to create and recreate political order, even when it fails to create a predictable, comprehensible environment. While the need for security is often seen as a malevolent or irrational element in political life, this article explains how the desire for order can also be understood as a dynamic interaction between the structure of human reason and the uncontrollable aspects of human life.Keally McBride is Assistant Professor of Politics at the University of San Francisco ([email protected]). Work on this essay began in a seminar sponsored by the National Endowment for the Humanities. She would like to thank Kevin Bundy, Carl Cheeseman, Mary Dietz, Nancy Hirshmann, James Martel, Hanna Pitkin, and John Zarobell for their comments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 11 - 20
Copyright
© 2008 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgold, Deborah. 1988. Hobbes's Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, D.S.T. 2007. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in European Cultural Debate 1425–1680. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooke, Paul D. 1996. Hobbes and Christianity: Reassessing the Bible in Leviathan. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Cooke, Paul D. 1997. An antidote to the current fashion of regarding Hobbes as a sincere theist. In Piety and Humanity, ed. D. Kries. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Forster, Greg. 2003. Divine law and human law in Hobbes's Leviathan. History of Political Thought 24 (Summer): 189–217.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, W.H. 1974. A note on Hobbes and the Book of Job. Anales de la Catedra Francisco Suarez 14: 11–34.Google Scholar
Halliday, R.J., Timothy Kenyon, and Andrew Reeve. 1983. Hobbes's belief in God. Political Studies 31: 418–33.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1996. Leviathan. Ed. Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lustick, Ian. 2006. Trapped in the War on Terror. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Martel, James. 2007. Subverting the Leviathan: Reading Thomas Hobbes as a Radical Democrat. New York: Columbia University Press.
Martinich, Aloysius. 1992. Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, Stephen, trans. 1992. The Book of Job. New York: Harper Perennial.
Mueller, John. 2006. Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. New York: Free Press.
Oakeshott, Michael. 1946. Introduction. In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Robin, Corey. 2004. Fear: The History of a Political Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skinner, Quentin. 1976. The Foundation of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, A.E. 1965. The ethical doctrine of Hobbes. In Hobbes; Studies, by Leo Strauss and Others, ed. K. Brown. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warrender, Howard. 1957. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.