Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:57:11.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Capital and Corruption: Vote Buying and the Politics of Reform in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2005

William A. Callahan
William A. Callahan
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I offer a critical view of the social capital thesis, which frequently argues that more is better (and less is worse), by examining the ethics of social capital, using Pierre Bourdieu's understanding of networks as defined by their limits. I argue that social capital only assumes conceptual coherence when distinguished from its complementary opposite. I illustrate these theoretical points with a discussion of political reform in Thailand and the 2001 general election. The election exemplifies the benefits of the circulation of social capital: voter turnout and party membership were up, and civil society was active. Yet democratic achievements in Thailand were intimately tied to political corruption. In Thailand, democracy and vote buying are intimately related as examples of the productive dynamic of social capital and corruption; the civil and the uncivil often produce each other. This essay thus expands social capital theory's focus on the relations of people by examining the relationality of concepts. One has to examine the quality of social capital and the ethics of each network's inside/outside distinction. Thus rather than being a political solution, social capital is a theoretical problem, warranting further comparative research that examines how civil social capital interacts with the uncivil social capital of corruption, ethnocentrism, and sectarianism.William A. Callahan is a professor of international politics at the University of Manchester, England. He worked in Thailand for five years as a journalist and a lecturer at Rangsit University (Bangkok). His most recent book is Contingent States: Greater China and Transnational Relations. For sharing information and commenting on this essay, the author thanks Gothom Arya, Michael Kelly Connors, Kevin Hewison, Laddawan Tantiwittayaphitak, Naruemon Thabchumpon, Duncan McCargo, Sukanya Bumroongsook, Sumalee Bumroongsook, Somchai Phatharathananunth, Frederic Schaffer, Teera Vorrakitpokatorn, Thavesilp Subwattana, Viengrat Netipho, and Stephen E. Welch. Special thanks to Jennifer L. Hochschild, the Perspectives reviewers, Frederic Schaffer, and Andreas Schedler for encouraging me to think about corruption and social capital in a new way.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 495 - 508
Copyright
© 2005 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1998. Murder and progress in modern Siam. In The spectre of comparisons, 174–91. New York: Verso.
Anek Laothamatas. 1992. Business associations and the political economy of Thailand: From bureaucratic polity to liberal corporatism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Anek Laothamatas. 1993. Sleeping giant awakens: The middle class in Thai politics. Asian Review 7 (1): 78–125.Google Scholar
Anek Laothamatas. 1996. A tale of two democracies: Conflicting perceptions of elections and democracy in Thailand. In The politics of elections in Southeast Asia, ed. R. H. Taylor, 201–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL). 2001. The emergence of new politics in Thailand: ANFREL election report, January 6–August 18, 2001. Bangkok: ANFREL and FORUM-ASIA.
Berman, Sheri E. 1997. Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49 (3): 401–29.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri E. 2003. Islamism, revolution and civil society. Perspectives on Politics 1 (2): 257–72.Google Scholar
Bratsis, Peter. 2003. The construction of corruption, or rules of separation and illusions of purity in bourgeois societies. Social Text 77 21 (4): 9–33.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology in education, ed. John G. Richardson, 241–58. New York: Greenwood Press.
Calhoun, Craig. 1993. Habitus, field, and capital: The question of historical specificity. In Bourdieu: Critical perspectives, ed. Craig Calhoun et al., 61–88. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Callahan, William A. 1998. Imagining democracy: Reading the Events of May in Thailand. Singapore and London: Institute for Southeast Asian Studies.
Callahan, William A. 2000. Pollwatching, elections and civil society in Southeast Asia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Callahan, William A. 2003. Beyond cosmopolitanism and nationalism: Diasporic Chinese and neo-nationalism in Thailand and China. International Organization 57 (3): 481–517.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A., and Duncan McCargo. 1996. Vote-buying in the Thai northeast: the July 1995 general election. Asian Survey 36 (4): 376–92.Google Scholar
Chatthip Nartsupha. 1991. The community culture school of thought. In Thai constructions of knowledge, eds. Manas Chitakasem, Andrew Turton, and 118–41. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
Chatthip Nartsupha. 2001. Noekhid setthakit chumchon: khosanue thaeng thrisadi naiparibot taeng sungkhom [The concept of community economics: A theoretical proposal for an alternative society]. Bangkok: Satabun Withithat.
Cheung, Gordon C. K. 2004. Chinese diaspora as a virtual nation: Interactive roles between economic and social capital. Political Studies 52 (4): 664–84.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1991. Identity/difference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Connors, Michael Kelly. 1999. Political reform and the state in Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia 29 (2): 202–26.Google Scholar
Connors, Michael Kelly. 2003. Democracy and national identity in Thailand. London: Routledge/Curzon.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. 1997. Bangkok: Council of State.
Croissant, Aurel, and Jorn Dosch. 2001. Old wine in new bottlenecks? Elections in Thailand under the 1997 Constitution. Working paper, University of Leeds. http://croissant.uni-hd.de/old_wine_in_new_bottlenecks.htm.
Far Eastern Economic Review. 2000. A moment of truth for democracy. November 9, 14–19.
Far Eastern Economic Review. 2001a. On an electoral collision course. January 11, 22–23.
Far Eastern Economic Review. 2001b. Reform: At death's door. February 8, 16–19.
Field, John. 2003. Social capital. London: Routledge.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1999. The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. London: Profile Books.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2001. Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly 22 (1): 7–20.Google Scholar
Gothom Arya. 2001. Election system and events in Thailand. Bangkok: Election Commission of Thailand.
Hero, Rodney E. 2003. Social capital and racial inequality in America. Perspectives on Politics 1 (1): 113–22.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2000a. Resisting globalization: A study of localism in Thailand. Pacific Review 13 (2): 279–96.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2000b. Thailand's capitalism before and after the economic crisis. In Politics and markets in the wake of the Asian crisis, ed. Richard Robison, Mark Beeson, Kanishka Jayasuriya, and Hyuk-Rae Kim, 192–211. London: Routledge.
Hicken, Allen. 2002. The market for votes in Thailand. Paper read at the conference Trading Political Rights: The Comparative Politics of Vote Buying, Center for International Studies, MIT, Cambridge, MA, August 26–27. http://web.mit.edu/cis/fw_cpvb.html.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1997. Good governance: The IMF's role. Washington, DC: IMF. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/exrp/govern/govern.pdf.
Jansen, Peter. 1991. Coup de technocrats. Asian Business (April): 16.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1996. Social and unsocial capital: A review essay of Robert Putnam's “Making democracy work.” Politics and Society 24 (1): 45–55.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan. 1997. Thailand's political parties: Real, authentic and actual. In Political change in Thailand: democracy and participation, ed. Kevin Hewison, 114–31. London: Routledge.
McCargo, Duncan. 1998. Alternative meanings of political reform in contemporary Thailand. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 13 (1): 5–30.Google Scholar
McCargo, Duncan, ed. 2002. Reforming Thai politics. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
McVey, Ruth Thomas. 2000. Of greed and violence and other signs of progress. In Money and power in provincial Thailand, ed. Ruth Thomas McVey, 1–29. Singapore: University of Hawaii Press.
Naruemon Thabchumpon. 2002. NGOs and grassroots participation in the political reform process. In McCargo 2002, 183–99.
Ockey, James. 2000. The rise of local power in Thailand: Provincial crime, elections and bureaucracy. In Money and power in provincial Thailand, ed. Ruth Thomas McVey, 74–96. Singapore: University of Hawaii Press.
Pasuk Phongpaichit, and Chris Baker. 2000a. Thailand's crisis. Chiangmai: Silkworm Books.
Pasuk Phongpaichit, and Chris Baker. 2000b. Chao sua, chao pho, chai thi: Lords of Thailand's transition. In Money and power in provincial Thailand, ed. Ruth Thomas McVey, 30–52. Singapore: University of Hawaii Press.
Pasuk Phongpaichit, and Chris Baker. 2002. Thailand: Economy and politics. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pasuk Phongpaichit, and Chris Baker. 2004. Thaksin: The business of politics in Thailand. Chiangmai: Silkworm Books.
Pasuk Phongpaichit, and Sungsidh Piriyarangsan. 1994. Corruption and democracy in Thailand. Bangkok: Political Economy Centre, Chulalongkorn University.
Pérez-Diaz, Victor. 2002. From civil war to civil society: social capital in Spain from the 1930s to the 1990s. In Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society, ed. Robert D. Putnam, 245–87. New York: Oxford University Press.
Prawase Wasi. 2002. An overview of political reform. In McCargo 2002, 21–27.
Prudhisan Jumbala. 1992. Nation-building and democratization in Thailand: A political history. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Social Research Institute.
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, Robert D. 2002. Conclusion. In Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society, ed. Robert D. Putnam, 393–416. New York: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, Robert D., and Kristin A. Goss. 2002. Introduction. In Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society, ed. Robert D. Putnam, 3–19. New York: Oxford University Press.
Riggs, Fred Warren. 1966. Thailand: The modernization of a bureaucratic polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
Robison, Richard, Mark Beeson, Kaishka Jayasuriya, and Hyuk-Rae Kim, eds. 2000. Politics and markets in the wake of the Asian crisis. London: Routledge.
Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2002. Disciplinary reactions: Alienation and the reform of vote buying in the Philippines. Paper presented at the conference Trading political rights: The comparative politics of vote buying, Center for International Studies, MIT, Cambridge, MA, August 26–27. http://web.mit.edu/cis/fw_cpvb.html.
Schaffer, Frederic Charles, and Andreas Schedler, eds. 2002. Trading political rights: The comparative politics of vote buying. International conference. Center for International Studies, MIT, Cambridge, MA, August 26–27. http://web.mit.edu/cis/fw_cpvb.html.
Sombat Chantornvong. 2002. The 1997 Constitution and the politics of electoral reform. In McCargo 2002, 203–46.
Somchai Phatharathananunth. 2002. Civil society and democratization in Thailand: A critique of elite democracy. In McCargo 2002, 125–42.
Thirayuth Boonmi. 2002. Good governance: a strategy to restore Thailand, trans. Savitri Gadavanij. In McCargo 2002, 29–35.
Unger, Danny. 1998. Building social capital in Thailand: Fibers, finance, and infrastructure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Viengrat Netipho. 2000. Itthiphon nai kan muang thongthin khong Thai: suksa koranee muang Chiangmai [Influence in local politics in Thailand: Case study of Chiangmai]. Journal of Social Sciences (Bangkok) 31 (2): 168–235.Google Scholar
Warner, Alison. 2003. Social capital as a societal resource for building political support in new democracies. European Political Science 2 (3): 61–67.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1973. The country and the city. London: Chatto and Windus.
Zmerli, Sonja. 2003. Applying the concepts of bonding and bridging social capital to empirical research. European Political Science 2 (3): 68–75.Google Scholar