Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:08:04.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Laurence R. Helfer
Laurence R. Helfer
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Law School. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The international intellectual property system provides an important illustration of how regime complexity shapes domestic and international strategies of states and non-state actors. This article describes and graphically illustrates the multifaceted nature of the international intellectual property system. It then analyzes the consequences of regime complexity for international and domestic politics, emphasizing the strategy of regime shifting and its consequences for chessboard politics and the domestic implementation of international rules.

Type
Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 39 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Frederick M. 2005. The WTO Medicines Decision: World Pharmaceutical Trade and the Protection of Public Health. American Journal of International Law 99: 317–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs). 1994. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments—Results of the Uruguay Round Vol. 31; 33 I.L.M. 1197.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinwoodie, Graeme B. 2002. The Architecture of the International Intellectual Property System. Chicago-Kent Law Review 77: 993–1014.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter. 2003. When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization. International Negotiation 8 (1): 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, Peter. 2002. Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting. Journal of World Intellectual Property 5: 765–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRAIN. 2005. Bilateral Agreements Imposing TRIPs-Plus Intellectual Property Rights on Biodiversity in Developing Countries. http://www.grain.org.Google Scholar
GRAIN. 2004. Plant Variety Protection (PVP). http://www.grain.org.Google Scholar
GRAIN. 2000. Andean Community Adopts New IPR Law. http://www.grain.org.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2004a. Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and the New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Making. Yale Journal of International Law 29: 1–83.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2004b. Mediating Interactions in an Expanding Intellectual Property Regime, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 36:123–136.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2004c. Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Varieties: International Legal Regimes and Policy Options for National Governments. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2007. Toward a Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property. University of California Davis University Law Review 40: 971–1020.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2001. The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy. In Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, ed. Porter, Roger B. et al. Washington DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichman, J.H. 1995. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement. International Lawyer 29: 345–88.Google Scholar
Reichman, J.H. 1997. Enforcing the Enforcement Procedures of the TRIPs Agreement, Virginia Journal of International Law 37: 335–56.Google Scholar
Saffrin, Sabrina. 2002. Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements. American Journal of International Law 96: 606–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Susan K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 1997. Trade-Environment Negotiations in the EU, NAFTA, and WTO: Regional Trajectories of Rule Development. American Journal of International Law 91: 231–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
't Hoen, Ellen. 2002. TRIPs, Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines: A Long Way from Seattle to Doha. Chicago Journal of International Law 3: 27–46.Google ScholarPubMed
WTO Doha Ministerial Conference, 4th Sess. Nov. 14, 2001. Declaration on the TRIPs Agreement and Public Health, WTO Doc. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/W/2.Google Scholar