No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Politics and Biology
A Discussion of Peter K. Hatemi and Rose McDermott's Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2013
Extract
Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics. Edited by Peter K. Hatemi and Rose McDermott. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011. 352p. $80.00 cloth, $27.50 paper.
Peter K. Hatemi and Rose McDermott's Man Is by Nature a Political Animal brings together some of the most important social scientists working at the intersection of political science, psychology, biology, and cognitive neuroscience. Given recent advances in cognitive neuroscience and given the proliferation of work in political science that draws on these advances, we have decided to invite a range of political scientists to comment on the promise and the limits of this line of inquiry. What can scientific developments in psychology, biology, and neuroscience tell us about “human nature”? Can these discourses reckon with the variation in time and space that has traditionally been at the heart of political science, perhaps even going back to the classic text from which Hatemi and McDermott derive their title, Aristotle's Politics?—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor
- Type
- Review Symposium: Politics and Biology
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. [1958] 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar. 1993. The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States Between the World Wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. 2009. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Charney, Evan. 2008. “Genes and Ideologies.” Symposium. Perspectives on Politics 6(2): 299–319, 337–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: . Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2004. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2011. Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1990. Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. G. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. G. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John. P., and Weidman, Nadine. 2004. Race, Racism, and Science: Social Impact and Interaction. New York: Abc-clio.Google Scholar
Kirby, Vicki. 2011. Quantum Anthropologies: Life at Large. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2007. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2009. Animal Lessons: How They Teach Us to Be Human. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Somerville, Siobhan. 1994. “Scientific Racism and the Emergence of the Homosexual Body.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 5(2): 243–66.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Cary. 2003. Zoontologies: the Question of the Animal. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar