Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:30:40.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polanyi's Revenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2013

Lisa L. Martin
Lisa L. Martin*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the beginning of the financial crisis of 2008, authors and politicians have regularly reminded us of the duality of crisis and opportunity. For policymakers, administrations, and candidates, crises represent opportunities to implement long-desired reforms, seize the public stage, and reframe old arguments in the light of today's urgency. As the books under review here suggest, crises also represent opportunities for scholars. Arguments that failed to gain traction in the past may now deserve new attention as they help us understand the roots of crisis or how to recover from it. New audiences may be receptive to established arguments, now that other policies have caused us grief and are failing to promote recovery. The public and decision makers could be open to listening to these arguments and their implications, now that crisis has revealed deep vulnerabilities.

The three books that form the basis of this review essay represent trenchant critiques of neoliberal economic theory and policies, including such foundational policy assumptions as globalization, deregulation, and reliance on sophisticated financial tools. Their authors, three prominent economists, draw our attention to problems of market failure, such as rampant rent-seeking behavior and externalities. By focusing on entrenched dilemmas that include widening inequality and the compatibility of democracy and globalization, they remind us of the ways in which markets are embedded in social institutions, and how such institutions both respond to markets and shape market outcomes. All bring with them a deep commitment to understanding the functioning of society and how to maintain the benefits of global capitalism while reining in its most destructive implications.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 177 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, Larry M. 2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 15–31.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth, and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. 2011. “Review Symposium: Class Politics, American-Style.” Perspectives on Politics 9(3): 643–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Sarah M., and Kurtz, Marcus J.. 2007. “Capital, Trade, and the Political Economics of Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 703–20.Google Scholar
Copelovitch, Mark S. 2010. The International Monetary Fund in the Global Economy: Banks, Bonds, and Bailouts. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, and Gerring, John. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 247–67.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel, Sturm, Jan-Egbert, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2009. “Global Horse Trading: IMF Loans for Votes in the United Nations Security Council.” European Economic Review 53(7): 742–57.Google Scholar
Galbraith, James K. 2000. Created Unequal: The Crisis in American Pay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, James K. 2009. The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Lange, Peter. 1991. “Political Responses to Interdependence: What's ‘Left’ for the Left?” International Organization 45(4): 539–64.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2011. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Haupt, Andrea B. 2010. “Parties' Responses to Economic Globalization: What Is Left for the Left and Right for the Right?” Party Politics 16(1): 5–27.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna, and Uno, Saika. 2007. “Racing to the Bottom or Climbing to the Top? Economic Globalization and Collective Labor Rights.” Comparative Political Studies 40(8): 923–48.Google Scholar
Noah, Timothy. 2012. The Great Divergence: America's Growing Inequality Crisis and What We Can Do About It. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Peters, Maggie. 2012. “Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Immigration Policy Making in the US Senate.” University of Wisconsin-Madison. Typescript.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Alasdair. 2010. The Logic of Discipline: Global Capitalism and the Architecture of Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, James A., Torvik, Ragnar, and Verdier, Thierry. 2006. “Political Foundations of the Resource Curse.” Journal of Development Economics 79(2): 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2008. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36(2): 379–415.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law and Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, David A. 2010. “Migrant Remittances and Exchange Rate Regimes in the Developing World.” American Political Science Review 104(2): 307–23.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, and Linz, Juan J.. 2011. “Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 9(4): 841–56.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2003. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2010. Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2002. Lending Credibility: The IMF and the Post-Communist Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. “Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve.” International Organization 62(1): 35–64.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1981. “Regulation, Reregulation, and Deregulation: The Political Foundations of Agency Clientele Relationships.” Law and Contemporary Problems 44(1): 148–76.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?” Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 731–51.Google Scholar