Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:21:13.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Embedded Knowledge Transparent: How the V-Dem Dataset Opens New Vistas in Civil Society Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

Michael Bernhard ,
Dong-Joon Jung ,
Eitan Tzelgov ,
Michael Coppedge  and
Staffan I. Lindberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show how the V-Dem data opens new possibilities for studying civil society in comparative politics. We explain how V-Dem was able to extract embedded expert knowledge to create a novel set of civil society indicators for 173 countries from 1900 to the present. This data overcomes shortcomings in the basis on which inference has been made about civil society in the past by avoiding problems of sample bias that make generalization difficult or tentative. We begin with a discussion of the reemergence of civil society as a central concept in comparative politics. We then turn to the shortcomings of the existing data and discusses how the V-Dem data can overcome them. We introduce the new data, highlighting two new indices—the core civil society index (CCSI) and the civil society participation index (CSPI)—and explain how the individual indicators and the indices were created. We then demonstrate how the CCSI uses embedded expert knowledge to capture the development of civil society on the national level in Venezuela, Ghana, and Russia. We close by using the new indices to examine the dispute over whether post-communist civil society is “weak.” Time-series cross-sectional analysis using 2,999 country-year observations between 1989 and 2012 fails to find that post-communist civil society is substantially different from other regions, but that there are major differences between the post-Soviet subsample and other post-communist countries both in relation to other regions and each other.

Type
Articles
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 342 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anheier, Helmut and Stares, Sally. 2002. “Introducing the Global Civil Society Index.” In Global Civil Yearbook 2002, ed. Glasius, Marlies, Kaldor, Mary and Anheier, Helmut. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew. 1993 [1981]. “Civil Society and the State, Poland 1980–81.” In From Neo-Marxism to Democratic Theory. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1970. Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49(3): 401–29.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. 2016. “The Moore Thesis: What’s Left after 1989?” Democratization 23(1): 118–40.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael, Hicken, Allen, Reenock, Christopher, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2015a. “Institutional Subsystems and the Survival of Democracy: Do Political and Civil Society Matter?” Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper No. 4. Available at https://v-dem.net/media/filer_public/62/8e/628e4e08-ffb4-45ee-84c5-a25032d1b0dc/v-dem_working_paper_2015_4.pdf Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael, Jung, Dong-Joon, Tzelgov, Eitan, Coppedge, Michael, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2015b. “The Varieties of Democracy Core Civil Society Index.” Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper No. 13. https://v-dem.net/media/filer_public/47/2e/472eec11-830f-4578-9a09-d9f8d43cee3a/v-dem_working_paper_2015_13_edited.pdf Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael and Karakoç, Ekrem. 2007. “Civil Society and the Legacies of Dictatorship.” World Politics 59(4): 539–67.Google Scholar
Bertelsmann, Stiftung. 2014. Transformation Index BTI 2014. Guetersloh, Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 1988. “Gramsci and the Concept of Civil Society.” In Civil Society and the State, ed. Keane, John. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, Miller, Michael K., and Rosato, Sebastian. 2015. “Dichotomous coding of democracy, 1800–2010,” Version 2.0.Available at https://b2998732-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/mkmtwo/Codebook-BMRv2.0.pdf; accessed August 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. and Paxton, Pamela. 2000. “Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 37(1): 58–86.Google Scholar
Bolt, Jutta and van Zanden, Jan Luiten. 2014. “The Maddison Project: Collaborative Research on Historical National Accounts.” Economic History Review 67(3): 627–51.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie and Wolchik, Sharon. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Center for Civil Society Studies. 2004.” Global Civil Society Index.” Available at http://ccss.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/12/Civil-Society-Index_FINAL_11.15.2011.pdf ; accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone and Kopstein, Jeffrey. 2001. “Bad Civil Society.” Political Theory 29(6): 837–65.Google Scholar
Civicus. 2011. “Civil Society Index: Key Findings from 2008-2011.” Available at http://www.civicus.org/news-and-resources-127/602-civicus-civil-society-index-key-findings-from-2008-2011; accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
Civicus. 2012. “The Origins of the Classic CSI.” Available at http://www.civicus.org/what-we-do-126/csi/classic-csi; accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
Civicus. 2013. The Civicus 2013 Enabling Environment Index. Available at http://www.civicus.org/downloads/2013EEI%20REPORT.pdf; accessed June 14, 2015.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jean and Arato, Andrew. 1994. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael and Gerring, John, with Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 247–67.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Andersson, Frida, Bernhard, Michael, Steven Fish, M., Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, McMann, Kelly, Mechkova, Valeriya, Miri, Farhad, Paxton, Pamela, Pemstein, Daniel, Sigman, Rachel, Staton, Jeffrey, and Zimmerman, Brigitte. 2016a. “V-Dem Codebook v6.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Andersson, Frida, Bernhard, Michael, Steven Fish, M., Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Marquardt, Kyle L., McMann, Kelly, Mechkova, Valeriya, Miri, Farhad, Paxton, Pamela, Pernes, Josefine, Pemstein, Daniel, Staton, Jeffrey, Stepanova, Natalia, Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, and Zimmerman, Brigitte. 2016b. “V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v6.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Andersson, Frida, Marquardt, Kyle L., Mechkova, Valeriya, Miri, Farhad, Pemstein, Daniel, Pernes, Josefine, Stepanova, Natalia, Tzelgov, Eitan, and Wang, Yi-ting. 2016c. “V-Dem Methodology v6.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, and Ciobanu, Vlad. 2016d. “V-Dem Country Coding Units v6.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Cornell, Agnes, Møller, Jørgen, and Skanning, Svend-Erik. 2015. “Democracy on Retreat: Crisis, State-Society Relations, and the Recurrence of Autocracy in the Interwar Years.” Presented at the Council for European Studies Annual Conference, Paris, July 8–10.Google Scholar
Darden, Keith and Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2006. “The Great Divide: Literacy, Nationalism, and the Communist Collapse” World Politics 59: 83–115.Google Scholar
Edwards, Bob and Foley, Robert W.. 1999. “Civil Society and Social Capital beyond Putnam.” American Behavioral Scientist 42(1): 124–39.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Foa, Roberto. 2012. “The Weakness of Post-Communist Civil Society Reassessed.” CES Papers - Open Forum 11, Available at http://www.scribd.com/doc/107064389/The-Weakness-of-Post-Communist-Civil-Society-Reassessed; accessed August 1, 2013.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Kubik, Jan. 1999. Rebellious Civil Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Kubik, Jan. 2014. “Myths and Realities of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 25(1): 46–58.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz, Kubik, Jan, and Wentzel, Michal. 2017. “Civil Society and the Three Inequalities in Contemporary Poland.” Comparative Politics 49(3): 331–350..Google Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. 2003. The Myth of Civil Society: Social Capital and Democratic Consolidation in Spain and Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmilllian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. 1995 [1767]. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Tiago and Branco, Rui. 2013. “Civil Society and the Quality of Democracy: Portugal, 1974–2010.” Presented at the 20th International Conference of Europeanists, Amsterdam, June.Google Scholar
Foa, Roberto and Tanner, Jeffery C.. 2012. “Methodology of the Indices of Social Development.” Working Paper No. 2012-4. International Institute of Social Studies. Rotterdam, Erasmus University.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2012. “Nations in Transit: Methodology.” Available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=352&ana_page=330&year=2006; accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Ed. and trans. Hoare, Q. and Smith, G. N.. New York and London: International Publishers, Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2001 [1820]. The Philosophy of Right. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Institute of Social Studies. 2015a. “Civic Participation. “Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Available at http://www.indsocdev.org/civic-activism.html; accessed June 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Institute of Social Studies. 2015b. “Clubs and Associations.” Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Available at http://www.indsocdev.org/clubs-and-associations.html; accessed June 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Jackman, Simon. 2004. “What Do We Learn from Graduate Students Committees? A Multiple Rater, Latent Variable Model, with Incomplete and Continuous Indicators.” Political Analysis 12(4): 400–24.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 1998. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary and Wand, Jonathan. 2007. “Comparing Incomparable Survey Responses: Evaluating and Selecting Anchoring Vignettes.” Political Analysis 15(1): 46–66.Google Scholar
Kołakowski, Leszek. 1974. “The Myth of Human Self-Identity.” In The Socialist Idea: A Reappraisal, ed. Kołakowski, Leszek and Hampshire, Stuart. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kopstein, Jeffrey and Reilly, David A. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 53: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1978 [1843]. “On the Jewish Question.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Tucker, Robert. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo and Schmitter, Philippe. 1986. “Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, vol. 4, ed. O’Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Phillippe, and Whitehead, Laurence. Baltimore MD:, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pemstein, Dan, Meserve, Stephen A., and Melton, James. 2010. “Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type.” Political Analysis 18(4): 426–49.Google Scholar
Pemstein, Dan, Tzelgov, Eitan, and Wang, Yi-ting. 2015. “Evaluating and Improving Item Response Theory Models for Cross-National Expert Surveys.” Working Paper No. 1. Varieties of Democracy Institute.:Google Scholar
Petrova, Tsveta and Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. “Transactional and Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Polity: The Puzzle of East-Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 40(1): 74–94.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2007. “Historical Legacies and Postcommunist Regime Change,” Journal of Politics 69: 908–926.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, Grigore and Tucker, Joshua. 2013. “Associated with the Past? Communist Legacies and Civic Participation in Post-Communist Countries.” East European Politics and Societies 27(1): 45–68.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Dylan J. 2010. The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania 1870–1945. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 2005. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M., et al. 2004. Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Volume Two. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Schnakenberg, Keith E. and Christopher Farris, J. 2014. “Dynamic Patterns of Human Rights Practices.” Political Science Research and Methods 2(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 2003. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell and Muller, Edward. 1994. “Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 635–54.Google Scholar
Smyth, Regina. 2006. Candidate Strategies and Electoral Competition in the Russian Federation: Democracy without Foundation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1985. “State Power and the Strength of Civil Society in the Southern Cone of Latin America.” In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2004 [1820]. Democracy in America. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
USAID. 2012a. “2011 CSO Sustainability Index for Sub-Saharan Africa.” Available at http://www.usaid.gov/africacivilsociety, accessed August 3, 2013.Google Scholar
USAID. 2012b. “The 2011 CSO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia.” Available at http://transition.usaid.gov/locations/europe_eurasia/dem_gov/ngoindex/, accessed August 3, 2013.Google Scholar
V-Dem Institute. 2015. “How to Use V-Dem Online Analysis Tools.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Available at https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/00/65/0065c989-43ee-4663-91ce-449a88e90af0/manual_online_tools.pdf, accessed September 27, 2016.Google Scholar
V-Dem Institute. 2016. “Posteriors—Varieties of Democracy v.6.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Available at https://curate.nd.edu/collections/und:kh04dn4278m.Google Scholar
Vachudová, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald F., and Deutsch, Franziska. 2005. “Social Capital, Voluntary Associations and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital Have the Greatest ‘Civic’ Payoff?” Journal of Civil Society 1(2): 121–46.Google Scholar
World Values Survey. 2013. “Documentation of the Values Surveys.” Available at http://www.wvsevsdb.com/wvs/WVSDocumentation.jsp?Idioma=I, accessed August 3, 2013.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bernhard supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Bernhard supplementary material(File)
File 73.8 KB