Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:57:15.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2004

Henry E. Brady
Henry E. Brady
Affiliation:
Henry E. Brady is the Class of 1941 Monroe Deutsch Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, and Director of the Survey Research Center and UC DATA at the University of California, Berkeley ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Two Paths to a Science of Politics” presents two strongly argued points of view about where we should be going in our discipline. The authors by and large agree on the nature of science and the variety of ways to do it, but they disagree on the most fruitful way to proceed at this moment. Granato and Scioli believe that we need to do more to test theories with data and to formulate theories that are based on data. We need, in their phrase, to consider the empirical implications of theoretical models (EITM). Rogers Smith thinks we need to take history, context, and meaning more seriously in order to understand phenomena such as political identity.Henry E. Brady's co-edited book with David Collier, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, will be published this year from Rowman and Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press. His thanks to David Collier, Gary King, Paul Sniderman, and the editorial staff of Perspectives on Politics for their helpful comments.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 295 - 300
Copyright
© 2004 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brady, Henry E., and David Collier, eds. Forthcoming. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, Md.: Rowan & Littlefield; Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Public Policy Press.
Brady, Henry E., and Cynthia S. Kaplan. 2001. Categorically wrong? Nominal versus graded measures of ethnic identity. Studies in Comparative International Development 35:3, 56–91.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, Charles. 1999 (1859). The Origin of Species. New York: Bantam Books.
Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hempel, Carl G. 1962. Deductive-nomological vs. statistical explanation. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, ed. Herbert Feigl, G. Maxwell. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 98–169.
Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.
Hempel, Carl G., and Peter Oppenheim. 1948. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–75.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. 1987. Natural selection as a causal, empirical, and probabilistic theory. In The Probabilistic Revolution: Ideas in the Sciences, vol. 2, ed. Lorenz Kruger, Gerd Gigerenzer, and Mary S. Morgan. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.
King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laitin, David. 1998. Identity in Formation: The Russian Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lloyd, Elisabeth. 1994. The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action, Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
Popper, Karl 1979. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Salmon, Wesley C. 1989. Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sekhon, Jasjeet. 2004. Quality meets quantity: Case studies, conditional probability, and counterfactuals. Perspectives on Politics 2:2, 281–93.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smart, J. C. C. 1963. Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Suppe, Frederick. 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Suppe, Frederick 1988. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbanan: University of Illinois Press.
Suppes, Patrick. 1967. What is a scientific theory? In Philosophy of Science Today, ed. S. Morgenbesser. New York: Merdian, 55–67.
Van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.