Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:36:59.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Framing AIDS Mobilization and Human Rights in Post-apartheid South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

Krista Johnson
Affiliation:
Agnes Scott College, Atlanta (E-mail: [email protected])

Extract

Human rights as a collective action frame has been an important aspect of social movement mobilization around AIDS since the beginning of the pandemic 25 years ago. As an epidemic strongly associated with homosexuality and other socially marginalized behaviors, the AIDS movement in the developed world fueled and built on traditions of gay identity politics and gay rights. When the AIDS epidemic was recognized in 1981, the gay movement had already reconstituted itself as a legitimate interest group pursuing civil rights and civil liberties. Building on the preexisting organizational foundations as well as cultural capital of the gay movement as well as others, the AIDS movement was not only able to push for the protection of the civil rights of people living with AIDS, but through its engagement with the medical profession and the political establishment over access to drugs, was able to insist on a correlation between health and human rights.Krista Johnson is Assistant Professor at Agnes Scott College in Atlanta ([email protected]). Her research on HIV/AIDS in South Africa was funded in part by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ford Foundation.

Type
PERSPECTIVES
Copyright
2006 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achmat, Zackie. 2004. The Treatment Action Campaign, HIV/AIDS and the Government. Transformation 54: 7684.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 61139.Google Scholar
Cleary, Susan, and Don Ross. 2002. The 1998–2001 legal struggle between the South African government and the international pharmaceutical industry: A game-theoretic analysis. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies 27 (4): 44594.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Friedman, Steven, and Shauna Mottiar. 2004. Rewarding engagement? The Treatment Action Campaign and the politics of HIV/AIDS. Available at www.nu.ac.za/ccs/files/.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Publishers.
Hall, Stuart. 1982. The rediscovery of “ideology”: Return of the repressed in media studies. In Culture, Society and the Media, ed. Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, and Janet Woollacott. London: Methuen.
Heywood, Mark. 2001. Debunking “Conglomo-talk”: A case study of the amicus curiae as an instrument for advocacy, investigation and mobilization. Paper presented at the Health, Law and Human Rights: Exploring the Connections conference, Sept. 29–Oct. 1, Philadelphia.
Johnson, Krista. 2005. Globalization and social policy in South Africa. New Political Science 27 (3): 30930.Google Scholar
Kane-Berman, John, and Patrick Laurence. 2002. Nevirapine case hinges on “available resources' and treatment. Cape Times, May 24.
Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal 51 (159): 89101.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lichbach, Mark I.1998. Contending theories of contentious politics and the structure-action problem of social order. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 40124.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Paul. 2002. Democracy, not insistence on core rights, will get people their basic benefits. Cape Times, July 4.
Masuku, Thabani, and Richard Calland. 2002. The state must afford core rights, or fail. Cape Times, June 6.
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
NATO CIS Operating, and Support Agency. 1994. A National AIDS Plan for South Africa 1994–5. Pretoria: National Secretariat, National AIDS Committee of South Africa.
Nattrass, Nicoli. 2004. The Moral Economy of AIDS in South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nolutshungu, Samuel. 1999. The constitutional question in South Africa. In TheState and Constitutionalism in Africa, ed. Issa Shivji. Harare: SAPES.
Schneider, Helen. 2002. On the fault-line: The politics of AIDS policy in contemporary South Africa. African Studies 61 (1): 14567.Google Scholar
Schneider, Helen. 2001. A struggle for symbolic power, Siyaya 8 (Winter): 821.Google Scholar
Schneider, Helen, and Joanne Stein. 2001. Implementing AIDS policy in post-apartheid South Africa. Social Science and Medicine 52 (5): 72331.Google Scholar
Shisana, Olive, and Nompumelelo Zungu-Dirwayi. 2003. Government's changing responses to HIV/AIDS. Development Update: The (Real) State of the Nation: South Africa after 1990 4 (3): 16587.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures, ed. Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow, 197217. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1992. Master frames and cycles of protest. In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford Jr., Steven K. Worden,and Robert D. Benford. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4): 46481.Google Scholar
Treatment Action Campaign. 2001. Why TAC is joining the court case against the PMA. Treatment Action Campaign Fact Sheet, February 1. http://www.globaltreatmentaccess.org/content/press_releases/01/030501_TAC_PS_SA_lawsuit.html