No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cinéma vérité and the Ontology of Cinema: A Response to Roy Germano
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2014
Abstract
In this response I discuss the cinema ontology of Roy Germano’s project of analytic filmmaking. I argue that though the project is at once compelling and ambitious, there are challenges posed by the medium of cinema itself that ultimately undermine Germano’s commitments to indexicality, referentiality, and continuity in political science research.
- Type
- Reflections Symposium
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014
References
References:
Bazin, André. 2004. “The Myth of Total Cinema.” In What Is Cinema? Volume 1. Transl. Gray, H.. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Transl. Tomlinson, Hugh and Habberjam, Barbara. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kracauer, Siegrfried. 1997. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murch, Walter., and Francis Ford, Coppola (1995). In the Blink of An Eye: A perspective on film editing. Beverly Hills: Silman-James Press.Google Scholar
Panagia, Davide. 2013. Impressions of Hume: Cinematic Thinking and the Politics of Discontinuity. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Panagia, Davide. 2012. “Why Film Matters to Political Theory.” Contemporary Political Theory
12(1): 2–25.Google Scholar
Panagia, Davide. 2010. The Political Life of Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar