Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T20:38:37.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

All Politics Is Local: The Reemergence of the Study of City Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2009

Jessica Trounstine
Jessica Trounstine
Affiliation:
Princeton University. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of local politics has been relegated to the periphery of political science and many explanations have been offered for the marginalization of the subfield. I offer three related arguments for why scholars should revisit the study of sub-state politics. First, the local level is the source of numerous political outcomes that matter because they represent a large proportion of political events in the United States. Secondly, there are methodological advantages to studying local politics. Finally, analyzing politics at the sub-state level can generate thoroughly different kinds of questions than a purely national-level focus and can offer different answers to questions that apply more generally. Research on local politics can and should contribute to broader debates in political science and ensure that we understand both how and why cities are unique.

Type
Perspectives
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 611 - 618
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aiken, Michael, and Alford, Robert. 1970. Community structure and innovation: The case of public housing. American Political Science Review 64 (3): 843–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton. 1962. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher, and Gersen, Jacob. 2007. “The Fiscal Consequences of Electoral Institutions.” Harris School Working Paper Series 07.13. Available at http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/About/publications/working-papers/pdf/wp_07_13.pdf.Google Scholar
Brooks, Leah, Phillips, Justin, and Ogorzalek, Tom. 2008. “Can Municipal Governments Be Trusted with Policy Implementation? A Re-Evaluation of Federal Block Grants.” Typescript.Google Scholar
Browning, Rufus, Marshall, Dale Rogers, and Tabb, David H.. 1984. Protest Is Not Enough: The Struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for Equality in Urban Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dreier, Peter, Mollenkopf, John, and Swanstrom, Todd. 2001. Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen. 2006. Reconstructing the Commercial Republic: Constitutional Design after Madison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaventa, John. 1982. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James, Dyck, Joshua, and Shaw, Daron. 2004. Registrants, voters, and turnout variability across neighborhoods. Political Behavior 26 (4): 343–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstone, J. David, and Peterson, Paul E.. 1973. Race and Authority in Urban Politics: Community Participation and the War on Poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan, and Trounstine, Jessica. 2005. Where turnout matters: The consequences of uneven turnout in city politics. Journal of Politics 67 (2): 515–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2003. The difference states make: Democracy, identity, and the American city. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 501–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2009. Urban space and American political development: Identity, interest, action. In The City in American Political Development, ed. Dilworth, Richardson. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Imbroscio, David L. 2006. Shaming the inside game: A critique of the liberal expansionist approach to addressing urban problems. Urban Affairs Review 42 (2): 224–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbroscio, David L. 2008. “Stunted solipsism”? A defense of the urban politics field. Urban News: The Newsletter of the Urban Politics Section, American Political Science Association 22 (1): 14–16.Google Scholar
International City County Managers Association. 2001. Municipal Form of Government Survey.Google Scholar
John, Peter. 2006. “Why Study Urban Politics.” Presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, Reading. Available at: http://www.ipeg.org.uk/papers/Why%20study%20urban%20politics040406.pdf.Google Scholar
Jones-Correa, Michael. 2009. Riots as critical junctures. In The City in American Political Development, ed. Dilworth, Richardson. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Judd, Dennis. 2005. Everything is always going to hell: Urban scholars as end-times prophets. Urban Affairs Review 41 (2): 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantor, Paul. 2008. Where is intellectual creativity? Urban News: The Newsletter of the Urban Politics Section, American Political Science Association, 22 (1): 11–12.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Chris, and Macedo, Stephen. 2006. The local roots of American inequality. PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (1): 59–64.Google Scholar
Kruse, Kevin. 2005. White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Michael. 2007. Dry Manhattan: Prohibition in New York City. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Robert. 2009. The city and exceptionalism in American political development. In The City in American Political Development, ed. Dilworth, Richardson. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen, et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas, and Denton, Nancy. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mullin, Megan. 2008. The conditional effect of specialized governance on public policy. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, William. 1996. The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Alice. 2007. The privatized city: The Manhattan Institute, the urban crisis, and the counterrevolution in New York. Journal of Urban History 34 (2): 333–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Eric, and Wong, Janelle. 2003. Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapotichne, Joshua, Jones, Bryan D., and Wolfe, Michelle. 2007. Is urban politics a “black hole”? Analyzing the boundary between political science and urban politics. Urban Affairs Review 43 (1): 76–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, Wallace, and Kaufman, Herbert. 1960. Governing New York City: Politics in the Metropolis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Self, Robert. 2003. American Babylon: Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Swanstrom, Todd. 2008. “Honey, They Shrunk the Field! Making Urban Political Science Big Again.” Urban News: The Newsletter of the Urban Politics Section, American Political Science Association 22 (1): 14–16.Google Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica. 2008. Political Monopolies in American Cities: The Rise and Fall of Bosses and Reformers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica, and Valdini, Melody Ellis. 2008. The context matters: The effects of single member versus at-large districts on city council diversity. American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 554–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Bledsoe, Timothy. 1988. Urban Reform and its Consequences: A Study in Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar