Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:47:14.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Without Heirs? Assessing the Decline of Establishment Internationalism in U.S. Foreign Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2008

Joshua W. Busby  and
Jonathan Monten
Joshua W. Busby
Affiliation:
LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas-Austin. E-mail: [email protected]
Jonathan Monten
Affiliation:
Harvard University. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Is establishment internationalism in decline? Conventional wisdom is becoming that structural shifts in the international environment along with generational, demographic, and cultural changes within the United States are inexorably leading to the decline of the broad, post-war internationalist consensus that dominated American foreign policy after 1945. Despite the frequent assertion that this change has taken place, very few studies have analyzed the extent to which establishment internationalism is in fact in decline. To answer this question, we first track trends in congressional foreign policy votes from the American Conservative Union (1970–2004) and Americans for Democratic Action (1948–2004). Our second set of indicators tracks the state of birth, educational profile, and formative international experience of a cross section of the U.S. foreign policy elite. Our third and fourth sets of indicators track elite attitudes as represented by presidential State of the Union addresses and major party platforms. We find support for increasing partisan polarization in Congress on foreign policy as well as increasing regional concentration of the parties. However, there is only mixed evidence to suggest that internationalism has experienced a secular decline overall. Support for international engagement and multilateral institutions remain important parts of elite foreign policy rhetoric. Moreover, we find that social backgrounds of U.S. foreign policy elites—save for military service—have not substantially changed from the height of the internationalist era.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 451 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Budge, Ian. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chace, James. 2004. 1912: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft & Debs: The Election That Changed the Country. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Chace, James, and Carr, Caleb. 1988. America Invulnerable: The Quest for Absolute Security from 1812 to Star Wars. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
Cronin, Patrick, and Fordham, Benjamin O.. 1999. Timeless principles or today's fashion? Testing the stability of the linkage between ideology and foreign policy in the Senate. Journal of Politics 61 (4): 967–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divine, Robert A. 1967. Second Chance: The Triumph of Internationalism in America during World War II. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Dueck, Colin. 2006. Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, David. 2005. American isolationism revisited. Review of International Studies 31 (2): 237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George. 2002. The (false) potential of the president's pulpit. The Public Perspective 13 (5): 6–9.Google Scholar
Fischer, David Hackett. 1989. Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. 1982. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of Postwar American National Security Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. 2004. Surprise, Security, and the American Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Felix. 1961. To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole. 1979. The three-headed eagle: The United States and system change. International Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 339–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole. 2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole, and Rosenau, James. 1980. Does where you stand depend on when you were born? The impact of generation and post-Vietnam foreign policy beliefs. Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole, and Rosenau, James N.. 1999. The political foundations of elites' domestic and foreign-policy beliefs. In The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy: Insights and Evidence, ed. Wittkopf, E. R. and McCormick, J. M.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas L. 1985–1986. The twilight of internationalism. Foreign Policy (Winter): 25–48.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 2004. Who Are We? The Challenges to America's Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2003. Is American multilateralism in decline? Perspectives on Politics 1 (3): 533–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2005. “Creating America's World: The Sources of Postwar Liberal Internationalism.” Presented at The Future of American Internationalism, Austin, Texas, October 7–8.Google Scholar
Isaacson, Walter, and Thomas, Evan. 1986. The Wise Men: Six Friends and the World They Made: Acheson, Bohlem, Harriman, Kennan, Lovett, McCloy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. Who influences U.S. foreign policy? American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohut, Andrew, and Stokes, Bruce. 2006. America against the World: How We Are Different and Why We Are Disliked. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven. 2004. On Many Foreign Policy Issues US Leaders and Public Agree, but Congress Votes to the Contrary. University of Maryland: Program on International and Public Attitudes (PIPA) [cited May 4, 2008]. Available from http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/FP_MakingProcess/HallofMirrors_Ocr04/HallofMirrors_Oct04_pr.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles. 2002. The End of the American Era. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles. 2003. The rise of Europe, America's changing internationalism, and the end of U.S. primacy. Political Science Quarterly 118 (2): 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles. 2004. “America Searches for Its Centre.” Financial Times, February 10.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles, and Trubowitz, Peter. 2007. Dead center: The demise of liberal internationalism in America. International Security 32 (2): 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard N. 1985. Generational Learning and Conflict Management. International Journal 40 (4): 555–85.Google Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn P. 1992. A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 2000. Whence American internationalism? International Organization 54 (2): 253–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 2005a. Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 2005b. “Making the Coalition that Made U.S. Liberal Internationalism.” Presented at The Future of American Internationalism, Austin, Texas, October 7–8.Google Scholar
Lieven, Anatol. 2004. America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lind, Michael. 1999. Civil war by other means. Foreign Affairs 78 (5): 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lithwick, Dahlia. 2007. “Justice's Holy Hires.” Washington Post, April 8.Google Scholar
Mann, James. 2004. Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1952. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Paul.Google Scholar
McDougall, Walter A. 1997. Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World since 1776. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Mead, Walter Russell. 1999/2000. The Jacksonian tradition. The National Interest: 5–29.Google Scholar
Mead, Walter Russell. 2001. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Meernik, James. 1993. Presidential support in Congress: Conflict and consensus on foreign and defense policy. Journal of Politics 55 (3): 569–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellow, Nicole, and Trubowitz, Peter. 2005. Red versus blue: American electoral geography and congressional bipartisanship, 1898–2002. Political Geography 24: 659–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklethwait, John, and Wooldridge, Adrian. 2004. The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Shoon Kathleen. 1996. Anchors against Change: American Opinion Leaders' Beliefs after the Cold War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offner, Arnold. 2002. Another Such Victory: President Truman and the Cold War, 1945–1953. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Bouton, Marshall M.. 2006. The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want from Our Leaders but Don't Get. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Kim, Dukhong. 2003. “‘Go it Alone’ Won't Go with the American Public.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 28–31.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, Lyn. 1987. Presidential speechmaking and the public audience: Individual presidents and group attitudes. Journal of Politics 49 (3): 704–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskin, Michael. 1974. From Pearl Harbor to Vietnam: Shifting generational paradigms and foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly 89: 563–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1996. Winning the Peace: America and World Order in the New Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur Meier Jr.. 1949. The Vital Center: The Politics of Freedom. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Reiger, Cheryl. 1992. Historical analogies, generational effects and attitudes toward war. American Sociological Review 57 (3): 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubowitz, Peter. 1998. Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy, American Politics and political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Peter, and Mellow, Nicole. 2005. “Going bipartisan”: Politics by other means. Political Science Quarterly 120 (3): 433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1986. On the foreign policy beliefs of the American people: A critique and some evidence. International Studies Quarterly 30 (4): 425–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1996. What Americans really think about foreign policy. Washington Quarterly 19 (3): 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R., and McCormick, James M.. 1990. The Cold War consensus: Did it exist? Polity 22 (4): 627–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, John, and Peters, Gerhard. 2006. The American Presidency Project [online]. University of California (hosted), Gerhard Peters (database), 2006 [cited February 28 2006]. Available from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=3396.Google Scholar
Wright, Thomas. 2007. “Great Power Responses to Threat Transitions and the Legitimacy Burden: U.S.-Soviet Relations 1943–1950.” Ph.D. diss., Georgetown University.Google Scholar