Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:43:19.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Theology of Prerogative: The Jurisprudential Miracle in Liberal Constitutional Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2008

Clement Fatovic
Clement Fatovic
Affiliation:
Florida International University. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Liberalism ordinarily requires authorities to provide a full public account of their actions so that citizens can critically evaluate those actions for themselves, but in times of life-threatening emergency, liberalism sometimes evinces a willingness to place unquestioning faith in executives who promise to deliver it from such evil. In doing so, liberalism violates its moral and epistemological commitment to “make public use of one's reason in all matters.” This article uses the framework provided by Carl Schmitt's concept of political theology to analyze the reluctance of liberals to ask questions of the executive in times of danger and uncertainty. That framework helps explain how both the content and the structure of liberal thought can shift in a theological (and specifically theistic) direction when faced with an emergency. This article demonstrates that the quasi-religious rhetoric sometimes used to justify expansions of executive power in practice has precedents in the theories of John Locke, William Blackstone, and Alexander Hamilton. Analysis of their writings suggests that the use of quasi-theistic language in discussions of emergency powers can have the effect of insulating “godlike” executives from the kind of scrutiny and criticism that liberalism usually promotes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 487 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, Douglass. 1974. Was Alexander Hamilton a Christian statesman? In Fame and the Founding Fathers: Essays by Douglass Adair. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1979. Commentaries on the Laws of England. 4 vol.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brookhiser, Richard. 2000. Alexander Hamilton, American. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Deborah. 2006. “An Evolving Faith: Does the President Believe He Has a Divine Mandate?” Available at http://www.beliefnet.com/story/121_12112.html, last accessed on April 10, 2006.Google Scholar
Fatovic, Clement. 2004a. Constitutionalism and presidential prerogative: Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian perspectives. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatovic, Clement. 2004b. Constitutionalism and contingency: Locke's theory of prerogative. History of Political Thought 25 (2): 276–97.Google Scholar
Flaumenhaft, Harvey. 1992. The Effective Republic: Administration & Constitution in the Thought of Alexander Hamilton. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, Kevin. 2004. “Giuliani Described Remark to Kerik Years Ago.” New York Times, September 1.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. 2001. Hamilton: Writings, ed. Freeman, Joanne B.. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1996 [1651]. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1993. The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert. 1998. From legitimacy to dictatorship—and back again: Leo Strauss's critique of the anti-liberalism of Carl Schmitt. In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1970. An answer to the question: “What is enlightenment?” In Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinerman, Benjamin A. 2007. Can the prince really be tamed? Executive prerogative, popular apathy, and the constitutional frame in Locke's Second Treatise. American Political Science Review 101 (2): 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1988. Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1963. A discourse of miracles. In The Works of John Locke in Ten Volumes. A New Edition, Corrected, Vol. IX. London: n.p.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1997. An Essay on Toleration. In Political Essays, ed. Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. 1987. The Federalist Papers, ed. Kramnick, Isaac. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Marshall, John. 1994. John Locke: Resistance, Religion, and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, Kirstie M. 1996. Judging Rights: Lockean Politics and the Limits of Consent. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 1998. The dilemmas of dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and constitutional emergency powers. In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 2004. From constitutional technique to Caesarist ploy: Carl Schmitt on dictatorship. liberalism, and emergency powers. In Dictatorship and History: Bonapartism, Caesarism, and Totalitarianism, ed. Baehr, Peter and Richter, Melvin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, Vicente. 2002. Locke's militant liberalism: A reply to Carl Schmitt's state of exception. History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (4): 345–61.Google Scholar
Mehring, Reinhard. 1998. Liberalism as a “metaphysical system”: The methodological structure of Carl Schmitt's critique of political rationalism. In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Heinrich. 1995. Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue, trans. J. Harvey Lomax. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1991. Considerations on representative government. In On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Gray, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws, ed. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia Carolyn, and Stone, Harold Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Andrew. 2000. Carl Schmitt's political metaphysics: On the secularization of “the outermost sphere.” Theory and Event 4 (1): http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v004/4.1norris.html.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. 1998. Locke on king's prerogative. Political Theory 26 (2): 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. 1999. Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. 2005. American kingship? Monarchical origins of modern presidentialism. Polity 37 (1): 24–53.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1985. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1986. Political Romanticism, trans. Guy Oakes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996a. The Concept of the Political, trans. George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996b. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol, trans. George Schwab and Erna Hilfstein. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996c. Roman Catholicism and Political Form, trans. G.L. Ulmen. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1999. Ethic of state and pluralistic state. In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2004. On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, trans. Joseph Bendersky. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2005. Political Theology, trans. George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2008. Constitutional Theory, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stourzh, Gerald. 1970. Alexander Hamilton and the Idea of Republican Government. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walling, Karl-Friedrich. 1999. Republican Empire: Alexander Hamilton on War and Free Government. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. Politics as a vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, eds. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. 2004. The Two Intellectual Worlds of John Locke: Man, Person, and Spirits in the Essay. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar