Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:59:13.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Science and Beyond: Presidential Address to the American Political Science Association

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2008

Robert Axelrod
Robert Axelrod
Affiliation:
University of Michigan ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is the Presidential Address delivered at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, August 30 to September 2, 2007. The theme is that the discipline of political science has benefited from imports from many other fields, but it also has a lot to offer in the way of exports to other fields. A personal example is the export of cooperation theory to cancer research. The main recommendation is to cultivate your curiosity by: reading up in a variety of fields so your mind will be well prepared, teaming up with others who can help you, loading up on research related to your problem, and lightening up when you need to escape from the problem for a while. Promising opportunities exist for political science to export to public health, cognitive and neuropsychology, and the design of web-based institutions.Robert Axelrod is the Mary Ann and Charles R. Walgreen, Jr. Professor for the Study of Human Understanding at the University of Michigan ([email protected]). This text is a renamed, footnoted and slightly revised version of his presidential address at the 2007 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. For help in preparing this address, he wishes to thank John Aldrich, David Axelrod, Vera Axelrod, Lily S. Axelrod, Michael Brintnall, Joshua Epstein, Rick Hall, Liz Gerber, Ross Hammond, Rob Hauck, Lisa Koch, Justin McCrary, Ken Pienta, Robert Putnam, Eric Rabkin, Amy Saldinger, Jasjeet Sekhon, and PhillipTetlock. For financial support he thanks the National Science Foundation.

Type
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 3 - 9
Copyright
© 2008 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John, et al. Forthcoming. “Interdisciplinarity: Its Role in a Discipline-Based Academy.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Axelrod, Robert, David E. Axelrod, and Kenneth J. Pienta 2006. Evolution of cooperation among tumor cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 13474–79.Google Scholar
Baer, Michael, Malcolm Jewell, and Lee Sigelman, eds. 1991. Political Science in America. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Barlow, Nora, ed. 1958. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Battelle, John. 2005. The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. New York: Penguin.
“Britannica Attacks …, and We Respond.” 2006. Nature 440: 582.
Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec. 2005. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature 43: 9–64.Google Scholar
Devlin, Hannah, 2007. “Brief Introduction to fMRI.” FMRIB Centre, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford. http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/education/fmri/introduction-to-fmri Accessed Sept. 25, 2007.
Easton, David. 1991. Oral history of David Easton: An autobiographical sketch. In The Development of a Discipline: Oral Histories in Political Science, ed. M. Jewell, M. Baer, and L. Sigelman. Lexington, KY: University of Lexington Press.
Easton, David, and Corinne S. Schelling. 1991. Divided Knowledge: Across Disciplines, Across Cultures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Freedman, D.A., and D.B. Petitti. 2005. Hormone replacement therapy does not save lives: Comments on the Women's Health Initiative. Biometrics 62: 918–20.Google Scholar
Giles, Jim. 2005. Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature 438: 900–901.Google Scholar
Greaves, Mel. 2000. Cancer: The Evolutionary Legacy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Hanahan, Douglas, and Robert A. Weinberg. 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100: 57–70.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Linda L., Benjamin K.S. Chan, and Harold C. Sox. 2002. Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Annals of Internal Medicine 137: 273–84.Google Scholar
Kessel, Frank, Patricia Rosenfield, and Norman Anderson. 2003. Expanding the Boundaries of Health and Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klein, Julie Thompson. 1996. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Lattuca, Lisa R. 2001. Creating Interdisciplinarity. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Lieberman, Matthew D. 2007. Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 259–89.Google Scholar
Loberg, Robert D., Chi Ying, Matt Craig, Lashon L. Day, Erin Sargent, Chris Neeley, Kirk Wojno, Linda A. Snyder, Li Yan, and Kenneth J. Pienta. 2007. Targeting CCL2 with systemic delivery of neutralizing antibodies induces prostrate tumor regression in vivo. Cancer Research 67 (19): 9417–24.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1942. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Correspondence, 1846–1895: A Selection with Commentary and Notes. Trans. Dona Torr. New York: International Publishers.
McCabe, Kevin A., Mary L. Rigdon, and Vernon L. Smith. 2003. Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organizations 52: 267–75.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2005. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pellmar, Terry C., and Leon Eisenberg. 2000. Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pierce, Sidney J. 1999. Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences 50 (3): 271–79.Google Scholar
Rhoten, Diana, and Andrew Parker. 2004. Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science 306: 2046.Google Scholar
Rigney, Daniel, and Donna Barnes. 1980. Patterns of interdisciplinary citation in the social sciences. Social Science Quarterly 61: 114–27.Google Scholar
Rilling, James K., et al. 2002. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 35: 395–405.Google Scholar
Salter, Liora, and Alison Hearn. 1996. Outside the Lines: Issues in Interdisciplinary Research. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Sanfey, Alan G., et al. 2003. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300 (5626): 1755–58.Google Scholar
Singer, Tania, et al. 2006. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439: 466–69.Google Scholar
Tankersley, Dharol, Jill C. Stowe, and Scott A. Huettel. 2007. Altruism is associated with an increased neural response to agency. Nature Neuroscience 10 (2): 150–51.Google Scholar
Taubes, Gary. 2007. “Do We Really Know What Makes Us Healthy?” New York Times Magazine, September 16, 22ff.
Weber, Steven. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weingart, Peter, and Nico Stehr. 2000. Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.