Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:27:48.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization, Development, and International Institutions: Normative and Positive Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2005

Helen V. Milner
Helen V. Milner
Affiliation:
Princeton University ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the conclusion of World War II, several international institutions were created to manage the world economy and prevent another Great Depression. These institutions include the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (now called the World Bank), and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was expanded and institutionalized into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995. These institutions have not only persisted for over five decades, but they have also expanded their mandates, changed their missions, and increased their membership. They have, however, become highly contested. As Stiglitz notes, “International bureaucrats—the faceless symbols of the world economic order—are under attack everywhere…. Virtually every major meeting of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization is now the scene of conflict and turmoil.”Helen V. Milner is the B. C. Forbes Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University and the director of the Center for Globalization and Governance at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School ([email protected]). She has written extensively on issues related to international trade, the connections between domestic politics and foreign policy, globalization and regionalism, and the relationship between democracy and trade policy. Her writings include Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (1997), Internationalization and Domestic Politics (co-edited with Robert O. Keohane, 1996), “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries” (International Organization 2005), “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape” (coauthored with B. Peter Rosendorff, International Organization, 2001). The author thanks David Baldwin, Chuck Beitz, Robert O. Keohane, Erica Gould, Steve Macedo, Lisa Martin, Thomas Pogge, Tom Romer, and Jim Vreeland for invaluable comments. She also received much useful advice from seminars at Princeton University and the Rockefeller Foundation's Bellagio Study and Conference Center.

Type
REVIEW ESSAY
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 833 - 854
Copyright
© 2005 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. 2002. Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1231–94.Google Scholar
Adsera, Alicia, and Carles Boix. 2002. Trade, democracy and the size of the public sector: The political underpinnings of openness. International Organization 56 (2): 229–62.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and David Dollar. 2000. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth 5(1): 33–63.Google Scholar
Aisbett, Emma. 2005. Why are the critics so convinced that globalization is bad for the poor? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11066.
Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger. 2002. The economics of the world trading system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bailey, Michael A., Judith Goldstein, Barry R. Weingast. 1997. The institutional roots of American trade policy: Politics, coalitions, and international trade. World Politics 49(3): 309–338.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 1999. The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53 (4): 699–732.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian M. 1995. Justice as impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Beitz, Charles R. 1999. International liberalism and distributive justice: A survey of recent thought. World Politics 51(2): 269–96.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 2000. Rawls's law of peoples. Ethics 110(4): 669–696.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 2005. Cosmopolitanism and global justice. The Journal of Ethics 9 (1–2): 11–27.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2004. In defense of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bird, Graham, and Dane Rowlands. 2001. IMF Lending: How is it affected by economic, political and institutional factors? Policy Reform 4 (3): 243–70.Google Scholar
Blake, Michael. 2001. Distributive justice, state coercion and autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3): 257–95.Google Scholar
Boughton, James M. 2001. Silent revolution: The International Monetary Fund 1979–1989. Washington, DC: IMF.
Buchanan, Allen. 2000. Rawls's law of peoples: Rules for a vanished Westphalian world. Ethics 110 (4): 697–721.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Hilton Root, eds. 2002. Governing for prosperity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Burnside, Craig, and David Dollar. 2000. Aid, policies and growth. American Economic Review 90(4): 847–68.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon. 2001. International distributive justice. Political Studies 49 (4): 974–97.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Shubham, Pinelopi Goldberg, and Panle Jia. 2003. Estimating the effects of global patent protection for pharmaceuticals: A case study of fluoroquinolones in India. Unpublished manuscript.
Chen, Shaohua, and Martin Ravaillon. 2005. How have the world's poorest fared since the early 1980s? World Bank Staff Paper 3341.
Cullity, Garrett. 1994. International aid and the scope of kindness. Ethics 105 (1): 99–127.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1978. Logic and society: Contradictions and possible worlds. New York: John Wiley.
Easterly, William, and Ross Levine. 2002. Tropics, germs and crops: How endowments influence economic development. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9106.
Easterly, William. 2001a. The elusive quest for growth: Economists' adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Easterly, William. 2001b. The lost decades: Developing countries' stagnation in spite of policy reform, 1980–1998. Journal of Economic Growth 6 (2): 135–57.Google Scholar
Easterly, William. 2003. Can foreign aid buy growth? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (3): 23–48.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A., and David Romer. 1999. Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review 89 (3): 379–99.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J. 1997. Empowering exporters. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Gould, Erica R. 2004. Money talks: The International Monetary Fund, conditionality and supplementary financiers. Unpublished manuscript.
Grant, Ruth W., and Robert O. Keohane. 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of supranational institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hoekman, Bernard. 2002. Economic development and the WTO after Doha. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2851.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
International Labor Organization. 2004. A fair globalization: Creating opportunities for all. Geneva: International Labor Office.
Kaufman, Robert R., and Alex Segura-Ubiergo. 2001. Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973–97. World Politics 53 (4): 553–87.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Krueger, Anne O. 1998. Whither the World Bank and the IMF? Journal of Economic Literature 36 (4): 1983–2020.Google Scholar
Kuper, Andrews. 2004. Democracy beyond borders: Justice and representation in global institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Loser, Claudio M. 2004. External debt sustainability: Guidelines for low- and middle-income countries. G-24 Discussion Paper Series 26. Geneva.
Lumsdaine, David Halloran. 1993. Moral vision in international politics: The foreign aid regime, 1949–1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Maizels, Alfred, and Machiko K. Nissanke. 1984. Motivations for aid to developing countries. World Development 12 (9): 879–900.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 2004. What self-governing peoples owe to one another: Universalism, diversity and the law of peoples. Fordham Law Review 72 (5): 1721–38.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff. 2002. Why democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreements. International Organization 56 (3): 477–514.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa, and Beth Simmons. 1998. Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. International Organization 52 (4): 729–57.Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya, and Arvind Subramanian. 2004. The WTO and the poorest countries: The stark reality. IMF Working Paper 04/81.
McGillivray, Fiona, and Alastair Smith. 2000. Trust and cooperation through agent specific punishments. International Organization 54 (4): 809–24.Google Scholar
McKinlay, Robert D, and Richard Little. 1977. A foreign policy model of US bilateral aid allocation. World Politics 30 (1): 58–86.Google Scholar
McKinlay, Robert D, and Richard Little. 1978. A foreign policy model of the distribution of British bilateral aid, 1960–70. British Journal of Political Science 8 (3): 313–31.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Alan. 2000. Report of the international financial institutions advisory commission. Meltzer Commission. Washington, DC.
Milner, Helen V. 1998. Rationalizing politics: The emerging synthesis of international, American, and comparative politics. International Organization 52 (4): 759–86.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 2004. Why multilateralism? Foreign aid and domestic principal-agent problems. Unpublished manuscript.
Milner, Helen V., with Keiko Kubota. 2005. Why the move to free trade? Democracy and trade policy in the developing countries, 1970–1999. International Organization 59 (1): 107–43.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., B. Peter Rosendorff, and Edward Mansfield. 2004. International trade and domestic politics: The domestic sources of international trade agreements and organizations. The impact of international law on international cooperation. Eyal Benvenisti and Moshe Hirsch, eds. Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press.
Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global capital and national governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 33(2): 113–47.Google Scholar
Özden, Çaglar, and Eric Reinhardt. 2002. The perversity of preferences: GSP and developing countries trade policies, 1976–2000. World Bank Working Papers 2955.
Özden, Çaglar, and Eric Reinhardt. 2004. First do no harm: The effect of trade preferences on developing country exports. World Bank Research Paper.
Pogge, Thomas W. 2002. World poverty and human rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Pogge, Thomans, and Sanjay Reddy. 2005. How not to count the poor. Forthcoming in Measuring global poverty, Sudhir Anand and Joseph Stiglitz, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pritchett, Lant. 1997. Divergence, big time. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (3): 3–17.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples; with, the idea of public reason revisited. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Risse, Mathias. 2004a. Does the global order harm the poor? Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Risse, Mathias. 2004b. What we owe to the global poor. Journal of Ethics 9 (1/2): 81–117.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Francisco, and Dani Rodrik. 2001. Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic's guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER macroeconomics annual 2000. Ben S. Bernancke and Kenneth Rogoff. Cambridge MA: MIT Press for NBER: 261–325.
Rodrik, Dani. 1996. Why is there multilateral lending? In Annual World Bank conference on development economics, 1995, ed. Michael Bruno and Boris Pleeskovic, 167–93. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Rodrik, Dani. 2000. Development strategies for the next century. Paper prepared for the conference on “Developing Economies in the Twenty-First Century”, Ciba, Japan, January 26–27. http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼.drodrik.academic.ksg/.
Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2002. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9305.
Romalis, John. 2003. Would rich country trade preferences help poor countries grow? Evidence from the generalized system of preferences. Manuscript. http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/john.romalis/research/
Rose, Andrew K. 2002. Do WTO members have a more liberal trade policy? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9347.
Rose, Andrew K. 2004. Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? American Economic Review 94(1): 98–114.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey, and Andrew Warner. 1995. Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1): 1–118.Google Scholar
Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. 2002a. The world distribution of income (estimated from individual country distributions). NBER working paper #8933.
Sala-i-Martin, Xavier. 2002b. The disturbing “rise” of global income inequality. NBER Working Paper 8904.
Schraeder, Peter J., Stephen W. Hook, and Bruce Taylor. 1998. Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle: A comparison of American, Japanese, French and Swedish aid flows. World Politics 50 (2): 294–323.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 2000. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (3): 229–243.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 2002. One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Steinberg, Richard. 2002. In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the in the GATT/WTO. International Organization 56 (2): 339–74.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Stone, Randall W. 2002. Lending credibility: The International Montetary Fund and the post-communist transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Subramanian, Arvind, and Shang-Jin Wei. 2003. The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10024.
Tetlock, Philip E., and Aaron Belkin, eds. 1996. Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thacker, Strom Cronan. 1999. The high politics of IMF lending. World Politics 52 (1): 38–75.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade, and Development (UNCTAD). 2004. Trade and poverty. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UNDP. 2004. Human development report 2004. New York: UNDP.
Van de Walle, Nicolas. 2001. African economies and the politics of permanent crisis, 1979–1999. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vaubel, Roland. 1986. A public choice approach to international organization. Public Choice 51 (1): 39–57.Google Scholar
Vaubel, Roland. 1996. Bureaucracy at the IMF and the World Bank: A comparison of the evidence. World Economy 19 (2): 195–210.Google Scholar
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and economic development. New York: Cambridge University.
World Bank. 2002. World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2003. Annual report 2003. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2004. Annual report 2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2004. Annual report 2004. Global economic prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Trade Organization. 2003. World trade report 2003. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
World Trade Organization. 2004. International trade statistics. Geneva: World Trade Organization.