Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:22:10.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Freshness of Fanaticism: The Abolitionist Defense of Zealotry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2007

Joel Olson
Joel Olson
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zealotry or fanaticism is increasingly regarded as one of the principal threats to liberal democracy in the twenty-first century. Yet even as it is universally disparaged, zealotry is a severely understudied concept. This article seeks to formulate a critical theory of zealotry and investigate its relationship to democracy through a close reading of the speeches of the radical abolitionist orator Wendell Phillips. The American abolitionists were passionate democrats. Yet many of them, such as Phillips, were also self-defined fanatics who believed in using extremist language and tactics on behalf of the slave. Phillips's speeches suggest a specifically political definition of zealotry as a strategy that seeks to mobilize populations in defense of a particular position by dividing the public sphere into friends (those who support the position) and enemies (those who oppose it) and pressuring the moderates in between. Through his defense of fanaticism and his argument for disunion, Phillips articulates a democratic form of fanaticism that challenges common pejorative associations of zealotry with irrationality, intolerance, fundamentalism, or terrorism.Joel Olson is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Northern Arizona University ([email protected]) and the author of The Abolition of White Democracy (University of Minnesota Press). Thanks to Randall Amster, Lisa Disch, Mike Kramer, Michael Lienesch, Jill Locke, Ryan Narce, David Schlosberg, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and criticisms of earlier drafts of this article. Thanks also to Baohua Yan, Steve VanDalen, Katrina Taylor, and Adria Mooney for valuable research assistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 685 - 701
Copyright
© 2007 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

About Us. ( n.d.) Center for the Study of Hate, and Extremism, California State University, San Bernardino: http://hatemonitor.csusb.edu/about.html accessed 3 January 2005).
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
Aptheker, Hebert. 1989. Abolitionism: A Revolutionary Movement. Boston: Twayne.
Aristotle. 1980. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. W.D. Ross et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Balakrishnan, Gopal. 2000. The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso.
Bellamy, Richard. 1999. Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise. London: Routledge.
Billington, James H. 1980. Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith. New York: Basic.
Bishop, M. Guy. 1981. Voices for moderation: The antislavery thought of the Lyman Beecher family. Mid-America 63 (3): 133–44.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1967. The Philosophy of Edmund Burke. Ed. Louis I. Bredvold and Ralph G. Ross. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carrese, Paul. 2004. Montesquieu's complex natural right and moderate liberalism: The roots of American moderation. Polity 36 (2): 227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, Henry. 1843. On abolition petitions. In The Life and Speeches of Henry Clay, vol. 2. New York: Greeley and McElrath.
Coulter, Ann. 2003. Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism. New York: Crown Forum.
Craiutu, Aurelian. (n.d.) “Faces of moderation: Trimming.” Manuscript.
Craiutu, Aurelian. 2001. The virtues of political moderation. Political Theory 29 (3): 449–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. 2005. Tocqueville's paradoxical moderation. Review of Politics 67 (4): 599–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneen, Patrick. 2005. Democratic Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Douglass, Frederick. 1852. What to the slave is the Fourth of July? Archives of American Public Address: http://douglass.speech.nwu/edu/doug_a10.htm.
Fladeland, Betty. 1964. Who were the abolitionists? Journal of Negro History 49 (2): 99–115.Google Scholar
Garrison, William Lloyd. 1831. To the public. The Liberator (Boston), January 1.
Goldberg, Carl. 2003. The failed courage of the fanatic. Pastoral Psychology 51 (3): 233–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haimain, Franklyn S. 1999. The voices of extremism revisited. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 16 (2): 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Neil. 1995. Zealotry and Academic Freedom: A Legal and Historical Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Hofstadter, Richard. 1965. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Hume, David. 1985. Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
Jewett, Robert, and John Shelton Lawrence. 2003. Captain America and the Crusade against Evil: The Dilemma of Zealous Nationalism. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans.
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2000. Terror in the Mind of God. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kraditor, Aileen S. 1989. Means and Ends in American Abolitionism: Garrison and His Critics on Strategy and Tactics, 1834–1850. Chicago: Elephant.
Lincoln, Abraham. 1953. The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Ed. Roy P. Basler. The Abraham Lincoln Association, 2006. http://www.hti.umich.edu:80/l/lincoln/.
Lincoln, Abraham. 1989. Annual message to Congress, December 3, 1861. In Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings 1859–1865. New York: Library of America.
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon.
Madison, James, et al. 1987. The Federalist Papers. New York: Penguin.
Mayer, Henry. 1998. All on Fire: William Lloyd Garrison and the Abolition of Slavery. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.
McAdam, Doug, et al. 1996. Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes—toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. Doug McAdam et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Trans. Anne M. Cohler et al. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1990. Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism. University of Chicago Press.
Newman, Jay. 1986. Fanatics and Hypocrites. Buffalo: Prometheus.
Nicholis, Roderick. 2002. Voltaire and the paradoxes of fanaticism. Dalhousie Review 82 (3): 441–69.Google Scholar
Olson, Joel. 2004. The Abolition of White Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Oz, Amos. 2002. How to Cure a Fanatic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Passmore, John. 2003. Fanaticism, toleration, and philosophy. Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (2): 211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Merrill D. 2002. John Brown: The Legend Revisited. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Phillips, Wendell. 1863. Speeches, Lectures, and Letters, first series. Boston: James Redpath.
Phillips, Wendell. 1891. Speeches, Lectures, and Letters, second series. Boston: Lee & Shepard.
Phillips, Wendell. 1965. Wendell Phillips on Civil Rights and Freedom. Edited by Louis Filler. New York: Hill and Wang.
Phillips, Wendell. 2001. The Lesson of the Hour: Wendell Phillips on Abolition & Strategy. Ed. Noel Ignatiev. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.
Pillsbury, Parker. 1883. Acts of the Anti-Slavery Apostles. Concord, NH: Clague, Wegman.
Plato. 1992. Republic. Trans. G.M.A. Grube and C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Robertson, Stacey M. 2000. Parker Pillsbury: Radical Abolitionist, Male Feminist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 2004. Party moderation and politicians' ideological rigidity. Party Politics 10 (3): 325–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The Concept of the Political. Trans. George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sierra Club. 2003. Statement on recent acts of violence in the name of the environment from Carl Pope, Executive Director (25 August): http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/releases/pr2003-08-25a.asp (accessed 26 June 2006).
Smith, Kimberly K. 1999. The Dominion of Voice: Riot, Reason, and Romance in Antebellum Politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Sorin, Gerald. 1972. Abolitionism: A New Perspective. New York: Praeger.
Sterling, Dorothy. 1991. Ahead of Her Time: Abby Kelley and the Politics of Antislavery. New York: W.W. Norton.
Stewart, James Brewer. 1986. Wendell Phillips: Liberty's Hero. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Voltaire. 1962. Philosophical Dictionary. Trans. Peter Gay. New York: Basic.
Weber, Max. 1921. Politics as a Vocation. Trans. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Politics_as_a_Vocation.
Whooley, Owen. 2004. Locating masterframes in history: An analysis of the religious masterframe of the abolition movement and its influence on movement trajectory. Journal of Historical Sociology 17 (4): 490–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky. 2004. The path to moderation: Strategy and learning in the formation of Egypt's Wasat Party. Comparative Politics 36 (2): 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, Garry. 1977. Feminists and other useful fanatics. Mankind 6 (1): 9–10, 42–44.
Wirth, Hans-Jürgen. 2003. 9/11 as a collective trauma. Journal of Psychohistory 30 (4): 363–88.Google Scholar
Young, Michael P. 2002. Confessional protest: The religious birth of U.S. national social movements. American Sociological Review 67 (5): 660–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Michael P., and Stephen M. Cherry. 2005. The secularization of confessional protests: The role of religious processes of rationalization and differentiation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44 (4): 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar