Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:58:46.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Data Don't Matter? Academic Research and School Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2005

Kevin Smith
Kevin Smith
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska–Lincoln ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

School choice has attracted much attention from academic policy analysts. Their data analyses, however, have become entangled in the politics surrounding debates over market-driven reform rather than serving as foundations for utilitarian policy making. High-profile research programs generate an increasing number of empirical studies, which are often valued for how well they fit ideological preferences rather than how useful they may be in offering practical guidance on workable and politically feasible strategies. In this paper I assess what supportable policy message(s) can be extracted from the large research literature on choice and vouchers.Kevin Smith is an associate professor of political science at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln ([email protected]). His most recent book is The Ideology of Education: The Market, the Commonwealth, and America's Schools.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 285 - 299
Copyright
© 2005 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Abernathy, Scott. 2003. The democratic consequences of school choice: Skimming, social capital formation, and the Milwaukee voucher experiment. Paper presented at the Yale Politics of Public Policy Seminar Series, October 8.
Belfield, Clive R., and Henry M. Levin. 2002. The effects of competition on educational outcomes: A review of U.S. evidence. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Benveniste, Luis, Martin Carnoy, and Richard Rothstein. 2003. All else equal: Are public and private schools different? New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Berliner, David C., and Bruce J. Biddle. 1995. The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Callan, Eamon. 1997. Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, David. 2001. Making democratic education work. In Charters, vouchers, and public education, ed. Paul Peterson and David Campbell, 241–65. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Chubb, John, and Terry Moe. 1990. Politics, markets and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Coleman, James. 1974. The meaning of equal educational opportunity. In Equality of educational opportunity: A handbook for research, ed. LaMar P. Miller and Edmund W. Gordon, 3–27. New York: AMS Press.
Coleman, James, and Thomas Hoffer. 1987. Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
Coleman, James, Thomas Hoffer, and Sally Kilgore. 1982. High school achievement: Public, Catholic and private schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
Coleman, James, et al. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Cookson, Peter. 1994. School choice: The struggle for the soul of American education. New Haven: Yale University Press.
DeLeon, Peter. 1997. Democracy and the policy sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Friedman, Milton. 1955. The role of government in education. In Economics and the public interest, ed. Robert A. Solo, 123–44. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Gill, Brian P., P. Michael Timpane, Karen E. Ross, and Dominic J. Brewer. 2001. Rhetoric versus reality: What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Goodlad, John. 1984. A place called school: Promise for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1996. The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.
Greene, Jay P. 2001a. The hidden research consensus for school choice. In Charters, vouchers, and public education, ed. Paul Peterson and David Campbell, 83–101. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Greene, Jay P. 2001b. An evaluation of the Florida A-plus accountability and school choice program. New York: Manhattan Institute.
Greene, Jay P. 2003. Vouchers for special education students: An evaluation of Florida's McKay Scholarship Program. New York: Manhattan Institute.
Greene, Jay P., and Paul E. Peterson. 2000. Should public discussion of political science research be controlled? Why interest group recommendations on the proper procedures for reporting research should be treated with skepticism. PS: Political Science and Politics 33 (2): 221–27.Google Scholar
Greene, Jay P., Paul E. Peterson, and Jiangtao Du. 1997. Effectiveness of school choice: The Milwaukee experiment. Occasional Paper 97-1, March 1997, Program in Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University.
Gutmann, Amy. 1987. Democratic education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hanushek, Eric. 1997. Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19 (1): 141–64.Google Scholar
Henig, Jeffrey. 1994. Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Howell, William G., and Paul E. Peterson. 2000. School choice in Dayton, Ohio: An evaluation after one year. Paper presented at the conference Vouchers, Charters, and Public Education, sponsored by the Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University, March 2000.
Howell, William G., and Paul E. Peterson. 2002. The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Hoxby, Caroline. 2000. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review. 90 (5): 1209–38.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1995. Replication, replication. PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 443–49.Google Scholar
Koch, Kather. 1999. School vouchers. CQ Researcher 9 (13): 283–303.Google Scholar
Kozol, Jonathan. 1991. Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: HarperCollins.
Krueger, Alan B., and Pei Zhu. 2003. Another look at the New York City school voucher experiment. Paper presented at the conference Randomized Experimentation in the Social Sciences, Yale University, August 20, 2002.
Kupermintz, Haggai. 2001. The effects of vouchers on school improvement: Another look at the Florida data. Education Policy Analysis Archives 9 (8). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n8.Google Scholar
Ladd, Helen F. 2002. School vouchers: A critical view. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4): 3–24.Google Scholar
Levin, Henry M. 1998. Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 (3): 373–92.Google Scholar
Maranto, Robert, Scott Milliman, and Scott Stevens. 2000. Does private school competition harm public schools? Revisiting Smith and Meier's The case against school choice. Political Research Quarterly 53 (1): 177–92.Google Scholar
Mayer, Daniel P., Paul E. Peterson, David E. Myers, Christina Clark Tuttle, and William G. Howell. 2002. School choice in New York City after three years: An evaluation of the School Choice Scholarships Program. New York: Mathematica Policy Research.
Metcalf, Kim, Ronald Beghetto, and Natalie Legan. 2002. Interpreting voucher research: The influence of multiple comparison groups and types. Paper presented at the conference The Promise and Reality of School Choice: The Milwaukee Experience, October 17–18, 2002, Milwaukee, WI.
Miller, D. W. 2001. The problem with studying vouchers. Chronicle of Higher Education 47 (44): July 13.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2001. Schools, vouchers, and the American public. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Molnar, Alex. The case against vouchers. 1996. Speech delivered at the national convention of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, Madison, WI, October 12. http://www.ffrf.org/fttoday/nov96/molnar.html.
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1969. Objectivity in social research. New York: Pantheon Books.
Paul, Kelli, Natalie Legan, and Kim Metcalf. 2003. A longitudinal examination of the demographic characteristics of applicants and entrants to the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program. Paper presented at the annual American Education Research Association, Chicago, April 2003.
Peterson, Paul E. 1990. Monopoly and competition in American education. In Choice and control in American education, ed. William H. Clune and John F. Witte, 73–96. New York: Falmer Press.
Powers, Jeanne M., and Peter W. Cookson Jr. 1999. The politics of school choice research: Fact, fiction, and statistics. Educational Policy 13 (1): 104–22.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1995. Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (4): 664–83.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ringquist, Evan J., Mary Anderson, Hye Sung Kim. 2002. Assessing the evidence regarding the effects of educational vouchers: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 25–28.
Rose, Lowell C., and Alec M. Gallup. 2000. The 32nd annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan (September): 41–57. http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kpol0009.htm.
Rouse, Cecilia Elena. 1998. Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 553–602.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mark, and Jack Buckley. 2002. What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 25–28.
Schneider, Mark, Paul Teske, Christine Roch, and Melissa Marschall. 1997a. Networks to nowhere: segregation and stratification in networks of information about schools. American Journal of Political Science. 41 (4): 1201–23.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mark, Paul Teske, Melissa Marschall, Michael Mintrom, and Christine Roch. 1997b. Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: The effects of public school choice. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 82–93.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mark, Paul Teske, and Melissa Marschall. 2000. Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Simon, Julian L., and Rebecca Boggs. 1997. Trends in the quantities of education: A pictorial essay. Economics of Education Review 16 (1): 69–80.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B. 2003. The ideology of education. Albany: SUNY Press.
Smith, Kevin B., and Scott Granberg-Rademacker. 2003. Money only matters if you want it to? Exposing the normative implications of empirical research. Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 223–32.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., and Kenneth J. Meier. 1995. The case against school choice: politics, markets, and fools. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Teske, Paul, and Mark Schneider. 2001. What research can tell policymakers about school choice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (4): 609–31.Google Scholar
Tyack, David, and Larry Cuban. 1995. Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001. School vouchers: Publicly funded programs in Cleveland and Milwaukee. Washington, DC. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01914.pdf.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2002. School vouchers: Characteristics of privately funded programs. Washington, DC: GAO. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02752.pdf.
Vandenberghe, Vincent. 1999. Combining market and bureaucratic control in education: An answer to market and bureaucratic failure? Comparative Education 35 (3): 271–82.Google Scholar
Wells, Amy Stuart, and Alejandra Lopez. 1999. Charter schools as postmodern paradox: Rethinking social stratification in an age of degregulated education. Harvard Educational Review 69 (2): 172–205.Google Scholar
Wenger, Jennie. 2000. What do schools produce? Implications of multiple outputs in education. Contemporary Economic Policy. 18 (1): 27–36.Google Scholar
Witte, John F., Troy D. Stern, and Christopher A. Thorn. 1995. Fifth-year report: Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Mimeo, University of Wisconsin, December.
Witte, John F. 1996. Reply to Jay Greene, Paul Peterson, and Du Jingtao: The effectiveness of school choice in Milwaukee: A secondary analysis of data from the program's evaluation. Unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin, August.
Witte, John F. 2000. The market approach to education: An analysis of America's first voucher program. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wolf, Patrick J. 2002. School choice and civic values: A review of the evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 29–September 2.
Wrinkle, Robert D., Joseph Stewart Jr., and J. L. Polinard. 1999. Public school quality, private schools, and race. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1248–53.Google Scholar