Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:48:05.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitutionalism and Political Science: Imaginative Scholarship, Unimaginative Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2005

Mark A. Graber
Mark A. Graber
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park and the University of Maryland School of Law ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1983 Martin Shapiro worried that the “new jurisprudence of values” being promoted by the new generation of public law scholars in political science would “serve as a cover for slipping back into playing ‘little law professor’ for undergraduates.” Proponents of the “jurisprudence of values” in political science, who engaged in constitutional theorizing about individual rights and the structure of governing institutions, would “writ[e] conventional case law doctrine” that “contain[ed] no distinctive political analysis.” Worse, the fruits of the behavioral revolution might rot should normative concerns take center stage in public law inquiry. Rather than further integrate the study of courts into mainstream political science, public law scholars would spend their time telling Supreme Court justices how to do their jobs. Shapiro predicted, “[P]olitical scientists trained in the empirically oriented ‘American politics’ field will be shoved to the edges of ‘public law,’ and political jurisprudence will be converted to ‘legal and political theory.’” Abandoning American constitutionalism was the best antidote for the threat a jurisprudence of values presented to the social science study of law and courts. Students of the judicial process, Shapiro declared in 1989, should explore “any public law other than constitutional law, any court other than the Supreme Court, any public lawmaker other than the judge, and any country other than the United States.”Mark A. Graber is a professor of government at the University of Maryland, College Park and a professor of law at the University of Maryland School of Law ([email protected]). He is the author of Transforming Free Speech, Rethinking Abortion, and Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. The author thanks Rogers Smith, Howard Gillman, Keith Whittington, Ran Hirschl, Jennifer Hochschild and several (not-so) anonymous reviewers from their advice and encouragement. Apologies to the numerous talented young students of public law whose fine works were omitted to conserve space.

Type
REVIEW ESSAY
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 135 - 148
Copyright
© 2005 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Henry J. 1999. Justices, presidents, and senators: A history of the U.S. Supreme Court appointments from Washington to Clinton. 4th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Abrams v. United States. 250 U.S. 616 (1919).
Agresto, John. 1984. The Supreme Court and constitutional democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Baer, Judith A. 1999. Our lives before the law: Constructing a feminist jurisprudence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barber, Sotirios A. 1984. On what the Constitution means. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Barber, Sotirios A., and Robert P. George, eds. 2001. Constitutional politics: Essays on constitution making, maintenance, and change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The least dangerous branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Brandon, Mark E. 1998. Free in the world: American slavery and constitutional failure. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brigham, John. 1987. The cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Brigham, John. 1996. The constitution of interests: Beyond the politics of rights. New York: New York University Press.
Brinkley, Alan, Nelson W. Polsby, and Kathleen M. Sullivan. 1997. The new Federalist Papers: Essays in defense of the Constitution. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Brisbin, Richard A., Jr. 1997. Justice Antonin Scalia and the conservative revival. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Burgess, Susan R. 1992. Contest for constitutional authority: The abortion and war powers debates. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Town of Harrison. 520 U.S. 564 (1997).
Clayton, Cornell W., and Howard Gillman. 1999. Supreme Court decision-making: New institutionalist approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clinton, Robert Lowry. 1989. Marbury v. Madison and judicial review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Coyle, Dennis J. 1999. A constitutionalist political science. The Good Society 9 (1): 76–78.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 1997. Political science and the new legal realism: A case of unfortunate interdisciplinary ignorance. Northwestern University Law Review 92 (1): 251–326.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 1998. The justices of strategy. Duke Law Journal 48 (3): 511–70.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision-making in a democracy: The Supreme Court as a national policy-maker. Journal of Public Law 6 (2): 279–95.Google Scholar
Davis, Sue. 1989. Justice Rehnquist and the Constitution: The quest for a new federalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Devins, Neal. 1996. Shaping constitutional values: Elected government, the Supreme Court, and the abortion debate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dinan, John J. 1998. Keeping the people's liberties: Legislators, citizens and judges as guardians of rights. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Downs, Donald Alexander. 1985. Nazis in Skokie: Freedom, community, and the First Amendment. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Downs, Donald Alexander. 1989. The new politics of pornography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Elkin, Stephen L. 2001. The constitutional theory of the commercial republic. Fordham Law Review 69 (5): 1933–68.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The choices justices make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1999. Mapping out the strategic terrain: the informational role of amici curiae. In Supreme Court decision-making: New institutional approaches, ed. C. W. Clayton and H. Gillman, 215–35. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Andrew D. Martin. 2001. The Supreme Court as a strategic national policy-maker. Emory Law Journal 50 (2): 583–611.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Olga Shvetsova. 2001. The role of constitutional courts in the establishment and maintenance of democratic systems of government. Law and Society Review 35 (1): 117–63.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 1995. The role of the Supreme Court in American society: Playing the reconstruction game. In Contemplating courts, ed. Lee Epstein, 315–46. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991. Reneging on history? Playing the Court/Congress/President civil rights game. California Law Review 79 (3): 613–84.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N., Jr., and Sanford V. Levinson, eds. 1998. Constitutional stupidities, constitutional tragedies. New York: New York University Press.
Ex parte McCardle. 74 U.S. 506 (1869).
Ex parte Milligan. 71 U.S. 2 (1866).
Feeley, Malcolm M., and Edward L. Rubin. 1998. Judicial policy making and the modern state: How the courts reformed America's prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional dialogues: Interpretation as political process. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fiss, Owen M. 1989. The law regained. Cornell Law Review 74 (2): 245–55.Google Scholar
Franck, Matthew J. 1996. Against the imperial judiciary: The Supreme Court vs. the sovereignty of the people. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Franklin, Charles, and Liane C. Kosaki. 1989. Republican schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. American Political Science Review 83 (3): 751–71.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2002. The birth of an academic obsession: The history of the countermajoritarian difficulty, part five. Yale Law Journal 112 (2): 153–259.Google Scholar
Georgia v. Stanton. 73 U.S. 50 (1867).
Gerber, Scott Douglas. 1999. First principles: The jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas. New York: New York University Press.
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. 418 U.S. 323 (1974).
Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Vanessa A. Baird. 1998. On the legitimacy of national high courts. American Political Science Review 92 (2): 343–58.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution besieged: The rise and demise of Lochner-era police powers jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Gillman, Howard. 2002. How political parties can use the courts to advance their agendas: Federal courts in the United States, 1875–1891. American Political Science Review 96 (3): 511–24.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard, and Cornell W. Clayton, eds. 1999. The Supreme Court in American politics: new institutionalist interpretations. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking federal judges: Lower court selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Goldstein, Leslie Friedman. 2001. Constituting federal sovereignty: The European Union in comparative context. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Goldwin, Robert A., and William A. Schambra, eds. 1985. How does the Constitution secure rights? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Graber, Mark A. 1991. Transforming free speech: The ambiguous legacy of civil libertarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Graber, Mark A. 1993. The nonmajoritarian difficulty: Legislative deference to the judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7 (1): 35–73.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 2001. Social democracy and constitutional theory: An institutional perspective. Fordham Law Review 69 (5): 1969–87.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 2002. Constitutional politics and constitutional theory: A misunderstood and neglected relationship. Law and Social Inquiry 27 (2): 309–38.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 2003. Establishing judicial review: Marbury and the Judicial Act of 1789. Tulsa Law Review 38 (4): 609–50.Google Scholar
Griffin, Stephen M. 1996. American constitutionalism: From theory to politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hall, Melissa Gann. 2001. State supreme courts in American democracy: Probing the myths of judicial reform. American Political Science Review 95 (2): 315–30.Google Scholar
Harris, William F. II. 1993. The interpretable Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
In re Debs. 158 U.S. 564 (1894).
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2003. Wheel of law: India's secularism in comparative constitutional context. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kahn, Ronald. 1994. The Supreme Court and constitutional theory, 1953–1993. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The strange career of legal liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Klarman, Michael J. 1994. Brown, racial change, and the civil rights movement. Virginia Law Review 80 (1): 7–150.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 1996. Rethinking the civil rights and civil liberties revolutions. Virginia Law Review 82 (1): 1–67.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2001. The white primary rulings: a case study in the consequences of Supreme Court decision-making. Florida State University Law Review 29 (1): 55–107.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996. On the struggle for judicial supremacy. Law and Society Review 30 (1): 87–120.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan E. 1990. The poor in court: The legal services program and Supreme Court decision making. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lemon v. Kurtzman. 403 U.S. 602 (1971).
Levinson, Sanford. 1988. Constitutional faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Levinson, Sanford. 2000. Preface to The American Supreme Court, by Robert G. McCloskey. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. 505 U.S. 1003 (1992).
Maddox, Graham. 1982. A note on the meaning of “constitution.” American Political Science Review 76 (4): 805–9.Google Scholar
Maltese, John Anthony. 1995. The selling of Supreme Court nominees. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting law on the Supreme Court: The collegial game. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. Public opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Maveety, Nancy. 1996. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: Strategist on the Supreme Court. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCloskey, Robert G. 2000. The American Supreme Court. 3rd ed. Rev. Sanford Levinson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McMahon, Kevin J. 2004. Reconsidering Roosevelt on race: How the presidency paved the road to Brown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Michelman, Frank I. 1988. Law's republic. Yale Law Journal 97 (8): 1493–1537.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. The Supreme Court as a counter-majoritarian institution? The impact of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review 87 (1) 87–101.Google Scholar
Mississippi v. Johnson. 71 U.S. 475 (1867).
Moore, Wayne D. 1996. Constitutional rights and powers of the people. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Morgan, Donald G. 1966. Congress and the Constitution: A study in responsibility. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of judicial strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, Walter F., James E. Fleming, and Sotirios A. Barber. 1995. American constitutional interpretation. 2nd ed. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
Novkov, Julie. 2001. Constituting workers, protecting women: Gender, law, and labor in the Progressive Era and New Deal years. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Peretti, Terri Jennings. 1999. In defense of a political Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pickerill, J. Mitchell, and Cornell W. Clayton. 2004. The Rehnquist Court and the political dynamics of Federalism. Perspectives on Politics 2 (2): 233–48.Google Scholar
Pinello, Daniel R. 2003. Gay rights and American law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan, and Trust Co. 158 U.S. 601 (1895).
Powe, Lucas A., Jr. 2000. The Warren Court and American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Powell, Thomas Reed. 1918. The logic and rhetoric of constitutional law. Journal of Philosophy 15 (November): 645–58.Google Scholar
Reed, Douglas S. 2001. On equal terms: The constitutional politics of educational opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ritter, Gretchen. 2002. Jury service and women's citizenship before and after the Nineteenth Amendment. Law and History Review 20 (3): 479–515.Google Scholar
Rogers, James R. 2001. Information and judicial review: A signaling game of legislative-judicial interaction. American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 84–99.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2000. Bringing politics back in. Northwestern University Law Review 95 (Fall): 309–26.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton L., ed. 1961. The Federalist Papers: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay. New York: New American Library.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1962. Constitutionalism: A preliminary discussion. American Political Science Review 56 (4): 853–64.Google Scholar
Schultz, David A., ed. 1998. Leveraging the law: Using the courts to achieve social change. New York: Peter Lang.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shapiro, Martin. 1983. Recent developments in political jurisprudence. Western Political Quarterly 36 (4): 541–48.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1989. Political jurisprudence, public law, and post-consequentialist ethics: Comment on Professors Barber and Smith. Studies in American Political Development 3 (1): 88–102.Google Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna. 1998. Our unconstitutional Senate. In Constitutional stupidities, constitutional tragedies, ed. William N. Eskridge Jr. and Sanford V. Levinson. 95–97. New York: New York University Press.
Silverstein, Gordon. 1997. Imbalance of powers: Constitutional interpretation and the making of American foreign policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Silverstein, Mark. 1994. Judicious choices: The new politics of Supreme Court confirmations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Silverstein, Mark, and Benjamin Ginsberg. 1987. The Supreme Court and the new politics of judicial power. Political Science Quarterly 102 (3): 371–88.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American constitutional law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civil ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S. history. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 1998. The inherent deceptiveness of constitutional discourse: A diagnosis and prescription. In NOMOS XL: Integrity and Conscience, ed. Ian Shapiro and Robert Adams, 218–54. New York: New York University Press.
Spaeth, Harold J., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1999. Majority rule or minority will: Adherence to precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stearns, Maxwell L. 2000. Constitutional process: A social choice analysis of Supreme Court decision making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Stoner, James R. 2003. Common law liberty: Rethinking American constitutionalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. One case at a time: Judicial minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sweet, Alec Stone. 2000. Governing with judges: Constitutional politics in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tarr, G. Alan. 1998. Understanding state constitutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1990. Democracy in America, ed. Phillips Bradley. New York: Vintage Books.
Tushnet, Mark V. 1999. Taking the Constitution away from the courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
United States v. E.C. Knight Co. 156 U.S. 1 (1895).
Vile, M. J. C. 1998. Constitutionalism and the separation of powers. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois. 118 U.S. 557 (1886).
Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. Toward neutral principles of constitutional law. Harvard Law Review 73 (1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1999a. Constitutional construction: Divided powers and constitutional meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Whittington, Keith E. 1999b. Constitutional interpretation: Textual meaning, original intent, and judicial review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Whittington, Keith E. 2001. The political foundations of judicial supremacy. In Constitutional politics: Essays on constitution making, maintenance and change, ed. Sotirios A. Barber and Robert P. George, 261–97. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Whittington, Keith E. 2003. Legislative sanctions and the strategic environment of judicial review. I-Con: The International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (3): 446–74.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. Forthcoming. To say what the law is: Judicial authority in a political context. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wolfe, Christopher. 1986. The rise of modern judicial review: From constitutional interpretation to judge-made law. New York: Basic Books.
Yalof, David Alistair. 1999. Pursuit of justices: Presidential politics and the selection of Supreme Court nominees. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.