Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:32:18.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2004

American Political Science Association Task Force
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Council of the American Political Science Association approved the appointment of a Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy in the fall of 2002. A fifteen-member task force was convened in January 2003 and collectively worked during the subsequent eighteen months to prepare extensive reviews of research on inequality and American democracy. (The research reviews are available on the APSA Web site—as are materials for undergraduate and graduate teaching—http://www.apsanet.org/inequality.) Based on three reviews, the task force prepared a short report, which forms the basis of the present text. It concludes that progress toward realizing American ideals of democracy may have stalled—and in some arenas reversed. The task force's work was extensively and rigorously debated among its members, scrutinized by three distinguished independent peers, and reviewed by the APSA Council. This report is ultimately the responsibility of its authors; no opinions, statements of fact, or conclusions should be attributed to the American Political Science Association or to the Russell Sage Foundation, which provided some support to the task force. The members of the task force are: Lawrence Jacobs (Chair, University of Minnesota), Ben Barber (University of Maryland), Larry Bartels (Princeton University), Michael Dawson (Harvard University), Morris Fiorina (Stanford University), Jacob Hacker (Yale University), Rodney Hero (Notre Dame University), Hugh Heclo (George Mason University), Claire Jean Kim (University of California, Irvine), Suzanne Mettler (Syracuse University), Benjamin Page (Northwestern University), Dianne Pinderhughes (University of Illinois, Champagne–Urbana), Kay Lehman Schlozman (Boston College), Theda Skocpol (Harvard University), and Sidney Verba (Harvard University).

Type
APSA TASK FORCE REPORT
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 651 - 666
Copyright
© 2004 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties. 1950. Toward a more responsible two-party system. American Political Science Review 44 (3), supplement.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, John M. de Figueiredo, and James M. Snyder. 2003a. Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Working Paper 9409. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, John M. de Figueiredo, and James M. Snyder 2003b. Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 105–30.Google Scholar
Balla, Steven, Eric Lawrence, Forrest Maltzman, and Lee Sigelman. 2002. Partisanship, blame avoidance, and the distribution of legislative pork. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 515–25.Google Scholar
Bang, Henrik. 1998. David Easton's postmodern images. Political Theory 26 (3): 281–316.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1991. Constituency opinion and congressional policy making: The Reagan defense buildup. American Political Science Review 85 (2): 457–74.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. Economic inequality and political representation. Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston. http://www.princeton.edu/∼bartels/papers.
Bartels, Larry M. 2003. Partisan politics and the U.S. income distribution. Paper presented at the Russell Sage Foundation Conference on the Social Dimensions of Inequality, Washington, DC,.
Bentley, Arthur. 1908. The process of government: A study of social pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Blendon, Robert J., John M. Benson, Richard Morin, Drew E. Altman, Mollyann Brodie, and Marios Brossard. Forthcoming. Changing attitudes in America. In Why Americans mistrust government, eds. Joseph Nye, Philip Zelikow, and David King. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burtless, Gary. 1999. Growing American inequality: Sources and remedies. In Setting the national priorities: The 2000 election and beyond, ed. Henry Aaron and Robert Reischauer, 137–65. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Campaign Finance Institute Task Force on Presidential Nomination Financing. 2003. Participation, competition, and engagement: How to revive and improve public funding for presidential nomination politics. Washington, DC: Campaign Finance Institute.
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carsey, Thomas, and Barry Rundquist. 1999. Party and committee in distributive politics: Evidence from defense spending. Journal of Politics 61 (4): 1156–69.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jere, Rebecca Warner, and David Segal. 1995. Military service and educational attainment in the all-volunteer force. Social Science Quarterly 76 (1): 88–104.Google Scholar
Danziger, Sheldon, and Daniel Weinberg. 1994. The historical record: Trends in family income, inequality, and poverty. In Confronting poverty: Prescriptions for change, ed. by Sheldon Danziger, Gary Sandefur, and Daniel Weinberg, 18–50. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Druckman, James N., Lawrence R. Jacobs, and Eric Ostermeier. Forthcoming. Candidate strategies to prime issues and image. Journal of Politics.
Easton, David. 1947. The theory of the elite. PhD diss., Harvard University.
Easton, David 1953. The political system. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Easton, David 1965. A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The macro polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York City: Cambridge University Press.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1999. Extreme voices: A dark side of civic engagement. In Civic engagement in American democracy, ed. Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina, 396–425. Washington, DC, and New York: Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
Ford, Lynne E. 2002. Women and politics: The pursuit of equality. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Francis, Mark, Valerie S. Sheridan, Natacha Leonard, and Diane R. Murphy, eds. 2001. Washington representatives 2001. Washington, DC: Columbia Books.
Frankenberg, Erica, Chumgmei Lee, and Gary Orfield. 2002. A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
Freeman, Richard. 2004. What, me vote? In Social inequality, ed. Kathryn Neckerman, 703–28. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Freeman, Richard, ed. 1994. Working under different rules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Freeman, Richard, and Lawrence Katz. 1994. Rising wage inequality: The United States vs. other advanced countries. In Working under different rules, ed. Richard Freeman, 29–62. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000. The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review 94 (3): 653–63.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2003. Public opinion and Democratic responsiveness: Who gets what they want from government? Paper presented at the Inequality and American Democracy Conference, Princeton, NJ, November 7–8. http://www.princeton.edu/∼csdp/events/pdfs/Gilens.pdf.
Gopoian, J. David. 1984. What makes PACs tick? An analysis of the allocation patterns of economic interest groups. American Journal of Political Science 28 (2): 259–81.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Peter. 1997. Inequality, income growth, and mobility: The basic facts. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (2): 21–40.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Peter, and Timothy Smeeding. 1997. Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (2): 633–87.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review 98 (2): 243–60.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Frank W. Wayman. 1990. Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review 84 (3): 797–820.Google Scholar
Herring, Pendleton. 1940. The politics of democracy: American parties in action. New York: Rinehard.
Hochschild, Jennifer. 1995. Facing up to the American dream: Race, class, and the soul of the nation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1993. The health of nations: Public opinion and the making of health policy in the U.S. and Britain. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1994. Issues, candidate image and priming: The use of private polls in Kennedy's 1960 presidential campaign. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 527–40.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Robert Y. Shapiro 2000. Politicians don't pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Benjamin Page. Forthcoming. Who influences U.S. foreign policy over time? American Political Science Review.
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Key, V. O. 1955. A theory of critical elections. Journal of Politics 17 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1961. Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Klinkner, Philip, and Rogers Smith. 1999. The unsteady march: The rise and decline of racial equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kroszner, Randall S., and Thomas Stratmann. 1998. Interest group competition and the organization of Congress: Theory and evidence from financial services political action committees. American Economic Review 88 (5): 1163–87.Google Scholar
Langbein, Laura. 1986. Money and access: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Politics 48 (4): 1052–62.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2000. Senate representation and coalition building in distributive politics. American Political Science Review 94 (1): 59–72.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Jonathan Nagler. 1992a. Individual and systemic influences on turnout: Who votes? Journal of Politics 54 (3): 718–40.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Jonathan Nagler 1992b. Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964–1988: The voters remain the same. American Political Science Review 86 (3): 725–36.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven, and James Snyder. 1995. Political parties and the distribution of federal outlays. American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 958–80.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven, and James Snyder 1997. The impact of federal spending on House election outcomes. Journal of Political Economy 105 (1): 30–53.Google Scholar
Lyons, Michael, and Peter F. Galderisi. 1995. Incumbency, reapportionment, and U.S. House redistricting. Political Research Quarterly 48 (4): 857–71.Google Scholar
Manza, Jeff, Fay Lomax Cook, and Benjamin Page, eds. 2002. Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy, and the future of American democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Manza, Jeff, and Christopher Uggen. 2004. Punishment and democracy: Disenfranchisement of nonincarcerated felons in the United States. Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 491–505.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2002. Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review 96 (2): 351–65.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne, and Joe Soss. 2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 55–73.Google Scholar
Michaels, Walter Benn. 2004. Diversity's false solace. New York Times Magazine, 11 April.
Mishel, Lawrence, Jared Bernstein, and Heather Boushey. 2003. The state of working America, 2002/2003. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Morone, James A., and Lawrence R. Jacobs, eds. 2004. Healthy, wealthy, and fair: Health care and the good society. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Center for Public Policy, and Higher Education. 2002. Losing ground: A national status report on the affordability of American higher education. San Jose, CA. http://www.highereducation.org/reports/losing_ground/ar.shtml.
National Telecommunications, and Information Administration. 1998. Falling through the Net II: New data on the digital divide. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html.
Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital divide: Civic information, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nye, Joseph S., Jr., Philip D. Zelikow, and David C. King, eds. 1997. Why people don't trust government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Oliver, Melvin, and Thomas Shapiro. 1997. Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.
Orfield, Gary, Susan E. Eaton, and the Harvard Project on School Desegregation. 1996. Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: W. W. Norton.
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1983. Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–90.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez. 2003. Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (February): 1–39.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Schier, Steven E. 2000. By invitation only: The rise of exclusive politics in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and John T. Tierney. 1986. Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Sidney Verba, and Henry E. Brady. 1999. Civic participation and the equality problem. In Civic engagement in American politics, ed. Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina, 427–60. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Shapiro, Thomas M. 2004. The hidden cost of being African American: How wealth perpetuates inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Skocpol, Theda 2003. Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Skocpol, Theda 2004. Voice and inequality: The transformation of American civic democracy. Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Skrentny, John D. 2002. The minority rights revolution. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Smeeding, Timothy M. 2002. Globalization, Inequality, and the Rich Countries of the G-20: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No.320. July 2002.
Smeeding, Timothy M. 2004. Public policy and economic inequality: The United States in comparative perspective. Paper prepared for Campbell Institute Seminar, Inequality and American Democracy, February 20. http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/campbell/Events/Smeeding.pdf.
Swain, John W., Stephen A. Borrelli, and Brian C. Reed. 1998. Partisan consequences of the post-1990 redistricting for the U.S. House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly 51 (December): 945–67.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan, and Abigail Thernstrom. 1997. America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Traugott, Michael W., and John P. Katosh. 1979. Response validity in surveys of voting behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (3): 359–77.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher, and Jeff Manza. 2002. Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review 67 (6): 777–803.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2003. Statistical abstract of the United States. http://www.census.gov/statab/.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weakliem, David L., Robert Andersen, and Anthony F. Heath. 2003. The directing power? A comparative study of public opinion and income distribution. Storrs, CT: Department of Sociology, University of Connecticut.
Welch, Finis. 2002. Half full or half empty? The changing economic status of African Americans, 1967–1996. In Beyond the color line: New perspectives on race and ethnicity in America, ed. Abigail Thernstrom and Stephan Thernstrom, 181–200. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Wilson, Woodrow 1908. Constitutional government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wilson, Woodrow 1952. Leaders of men. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wright, John R. 1985. PACs, contributions, and roll calls: An organizational perspective. American Political Science Review 79 (2): 400–14.Google Scholar
Wright, John R. 1990. Contributions, lobbying, and committee voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 84 (2): 417–38.Google Scholar