Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:29:57.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Bulls Distributing America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2009

John Gordon
Affiliation:
Professor of Ecclesiastical History, Theological Seminary, Omaha, Neb.

Extract

When Columbus anchored in the Tagus River, March 5, 1493, he precipitated on Europe one of the most difficult questions with which the mind of man has ever grappled. It was this: By what title should the New World be held ? The Catholic sovereigns Ferdinand and Isabella determined to hold what their Admiral had discovered. But the Spanish lawyers found great difficulty in proving their title under the Roman law, which alone would be accepted as conclusive by the other powers, because it did not recognize the right of discovery. The Roman law recognized the acquisition of property through the operation of either the jus gentium or the jus civile? Under the jus gentium, which alone was applicable in this case, property could be acquired: ist, by occupation, occupatio; 2d, by natural increase, as land formed by seas or rivers, accessio; 3d, by transfer, traditio. The only doctrine suitable to the purposes of Spain was that of “occupation,” which some eminent Roman lawyers incorporated not in the jus gentium but in the jus natura, as affirming a natural right.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Church History 1892

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 81 note 1 Kent, , Commentaries, iii., 492.Google Scholar

page 81 note 2 Phillimore, , International Law, i., 240.Google Scholar

page 81 note 3 Maine, , Ancient Law, 3d Amer. ed., 219, 241.Google Scholar

page 82 note 1 Grotius, , 1. ii., c. ix., sec. II, p. 228.Google Scholar

page 82 note 2 Phillimore, , International Law, ii., 325.Google Scholar

page 83 note 1 Navarette, , Coleccion de los Viages, etc., Madrid, 1825, sqq., 5 vols.Google Scholar

page 83 note 2 Muñoz, , Historia del Nuevo Mondo.Google Scholar

page 84 note 1 Harrisse, , Bibl. Amer. Vet. Additions.Google Scholar

page 84 note 2 After the words “Versus Indiem” supply “omnes insulas et terras firmas inventas et inveniendas, detectus et detegendas versus Occidentem & Meridiem, fabricando & construendo lineam a Polo Arctico ad Polum Antarcticum, sive terre firmae & insula inventæ & inveniende sint versus Indiem aut versus aliquam quamcunque partem, quæ lina distet a qualibet insulam, quæ vulgariter nuncupanter de los Azores y capo verde centem leucis versus Occidentem & Meridiem.”

page 84 note 3 Winsor, , Christopher Columbus, 305.Google Scholar

page 86 note 1 Humboldt, , Examen Critique, iii., 4452Google Scholar (note). Cf. Peschel, Oscar, Die Theilung der Erde unter Pabst Alexader VI. und Julius II., Leipzig, 1871.Google Scholar

page 88 note 1 Hakluyt, , Westerns Planting, ch. 18, 19Google Scholar. Cf. Bacon, , Henry VII.Google Scholar

page 88 note 2 Maine, , Ancient Law 241.Google Scholar

page 88 note 3 Wheaton, 's International Law, Lawrence's ed., 306, 307, 314.Google Scholar

page 88 note 4 Vattel, , Law of Nations, 1. i., c. 18, sec. 207, 208.Google Scholar

page 88 note 5 Marshall, , Johnston, C.-J.vs. McIntosh, 8 Wheat., 543, 572, 579, 587.Google Scholar