Article contents
Luther and Economic Questions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2009
Extract
There are two facts to be borne in mind in regard to Luther's whole attitude to social and economic questions. The first is that ordinarily this was a territory to be confined to experts, in which ministers should not meddle. He believed that a special knowledge was necessary to deal with some of these matters, and that they had better be left to those to whom Providence had assigned them, whether the jurists, those clever in worldly knowledge, or the authorities. The other fact is that the Church after all has social duties, and that Church and clergy must fight flagrant abuses and try to bring in the Kingdom of God on earth. The Church must use the Word of God against sin and sinners, and so by spiritual ministries help the needs of the time. The authorities on their part shall proceed by strict justice against evil doers. But there is another fact here which it is necessary to mention to get Luther's whole attitude, viz., that the State's function is not simply to administer justice, but to secure the general weal. They shall do the very best they can for their subjects, says Luther. “The authorities shall serve their subjects and use their office not petulantly [nicht zu Mutwillen] but for the advancement of the common good, and especially for the poor.” The princes shall give laws which shall limit as far as possible social misery and national dangers. They should listen to the proposals of the Church to this end, and on the ground of wise counsels of churchmen, do away with old laws and make new ones.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society for Church History 1910
References
page 133 note 1 Erl. Ausg. 23: 296; 24: 264.
page 133 note 2 38: 324.
page 134 note 1 Seeberg, , Luther's Stellung zu den sittl. u. sozialen Nöten s. Zeit in Neue Kirchliche Zeitschrift, xii. (1901), 851.Google Scholar
page 134 note 2 Ibid., 852.
page 135 note 1 Erl Ausg., 51: 422.
page 135 note 2 20: 272 f. 1
page 135 note 3 5: 93; 20: 284; 4: 330; 13: 95, etc.
page 135 note 4 4: 380, etc.
page 136 note 1 Erl Ausg., 1: 250; 52: 112. See further in Ward, , Darstellung und Wūrdigung der Ansichten Luthers vom Stoat u. seitten wirstschaftlichen Aufgaben, Jena, 1898, 47 ff.Google Scholar
page 136 note 2 Erl Ausg., 9: 319.
page 136 note 3 22: 28; cf. 57: 358; 20: 286. See also Erhardt, 's putting of this side of Luther in his article on “The Economic Views of the Reformers” in Theol. Studien und Kritiken, 1880, H. 4, 677 ff.Google Scholar
page 136 note 4 Geschichte der Nationalōkonomik in Deutschland, Mūnchen, 1874, 68.Google Scholar
page 136 note 5 Erl Ausg., 57: 137. See Schmoller, , Zur Geschichte dernat. ökonom. Ansichten in Deutschland während der Reformationsperiod in Tiübinger Zeitschrift 1860, 474.Google Scholar
page 136 note 6 Erl Ausg., 57: 342.
page 136 note 7 57: 248.
page 136 note 8 61: 352–3.
page 136 note 9 21: 375.
page 137 note 1 See Schmoller, , 484 ff.Google Scholar
page 137 note 2 Erl Ausg., 20: 40.
page 137 note 3 62: 173.
page 137 note 4 22: 249.
page 137 note 5 22: 273, 279, 282, 284.
page 137 note 6 62: 173.
page 137 note 7 22: 73.
page 138 note 1 Erl Ausg., 20: 89–122.
page 138 note 2 22: 199–226.
page 138 note 3 23: 282–338. The second book (1524) has been translated by ProfessorCarruth of the University of Kansas in the Open Court (Chicago), January, 1897, 16–34 (vol. xi.).
page 139 note 1 Erl Ausg., 20: 105.
page 139 note 2 20: 107.
page 139 note 3 Erhardt, , 704.Google Scholar
page 140 note 1 Erl Ausg., 20: 110.
page 140 note 2 21: 356.
page 140 note 3 22: 213.
page 140 note 4 20: 115.
page 140 note 5 57: 360.
page 141 note 1 Erl Ausg., 23: 27.
page 141 note 2 54: 277: 55: 11 f.
page 141 note 3 22: 181,201.
page 141 note 4 5:95; 57:359.
page 141 note 5 8: 283; cf. 21: 357; 57: 360–1.
page 142 note 1 Erl Ausg., 21: 357.
page 142 note 2 22: 223–4.
page 142 note 3 See among others the great book of the late Lloyd, Henry Demarest, Wealth against Commonwealth, New York, 1894.Google Scholar
page 143 note 1 Erl Ausg.,22: 203–4,206, 215, 218 f.
page 143 note 2 See Ward, , 74–5.Google Scholar
page 143 note 3 Erl Ausg., 22: 206.
page 143 note 4 22: 203.
page 143 note 5 Elster in Conrad, 's Jahrbüchern, 1878, 180.Google Scholar
page 144 note 1 Erl Ausg., 20: 204.
page 144 note 2 57: 343.
page 144 note 3 57: 339.
page 144 note 4 22: 216, 218.
page 144 note 5 31: 398–9.
page 144 note 6 2: 83; 50: 185–6.
page 144 note 7 Cf. 31: 299.
page 144 note 8 6: 97.
page 144 note 9 6: 96.
page 145 note 1 Erl. A usg., 23: 307.
page 145 note 2 Purcell, , Life Cardinal Manning, Lond., 1896, ii., 656.Google Scholar
page 146 note 1 See Paret, , Der Einfiuss der Reformation auf die Armenpflege, Stuttgart, 1896, 20–2.Google Scholar
page 147 note 1 Erl Ausg., 21: 336. Luther, published the Leisnig ordinances a with preface, 22: 105 ff.Google Scholar (Ordnung eines gemeinen Kastens, 1523, reprinted in Lietzmann'sadmirable series of Kleine Texte fūr theol. Vorlesungen und Uebungen, Bonn, 1908), and information will be found in Ward, 90 ff.; Braasch, , Luther's Stellung zum Sozialismus, Braunschweig, 1897, 146 ff.;Google ScholarKöstlin, , Martin Luther, 5 Aufl., i., 550 f.Google Scholar
page 148 note 1 Seeberg, , 841–2. Reprinted in his Aus Religion und Geschichte, 1906, 259.Google Scholar
page 148 note 2 Seeberg, , 842–3.Google Scholar
page 149 note 1 Gesch. der Nalionalōkonomik in Deutschland, Mūnchen, 1874, 59.Google Scholar
page 149 note 2 Erl. Ausg., 23: 306.
page 149 note 3 24: 281.
page 149 note 4 20: 117, 122; 22: 204; 23: 284, 296ff.; 24: 282.
page 150 note 1 Seeberg, , 855. Also in his Aus Geschichte, etc., 273.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by