Article contents
Adam Pastor, Antitrinitarian Antipædobaptist
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2009
Extract
The intellectual, social, and religious upheaval of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries of which the Renaissance and the Protestant Revolution were phases, along with the decidedly skeptical tendency of the Scotist philosophy which undermined the arguments by which the great mysteries of the Christian faith had commonly been supported while accepting unconditionally the dogmas of the Church—together with the influence of Neoplatonizing mysticism which aimed and claimed to raise its subjects into such direct and complete union and communion with the Infinite as to make any kind of objective authority superfluous:—all these influences conspired to lead many of the most conscientious and profoundly religious thinkers of the sixteenth century to reject simultaneously the baptism of infants and the traditional doctrine of the Trinity. Infant baptism they regarded as being without scriptural warrant, subversive of an ordinance of Christ, and inconsistent with regenerate church membership. Likewise the doctrine of the tripersonality of God, as set forth in the so-called Nicene and Athanasian creeds, involving the co-eternity, co-equality and consubstantiality of the Son with the Father and the personality of the Holy Spirit, they subjected to searching and fundamental criticism.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society for Church History 1917
References
page 78 note 1 See Benrath, K., Wiedertäufer im Venetianischen um die Mitte des XVI. Jahrhunderts, in Theologische Studien und Kritiken, 1885; also my Anti-Pedobaptism, pp. 323–339.Google Scholar
page 78 note 2 Inlasschingen in het vertaalde Werk van Bullinger: “Tegens de Wederdoopers,” Emden, , 1569, reprinted in Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica, vol. vii.Google Scholar
page 80 note 1 Die, “Wiedertäufer” im Herzogtum Jülich, Berlin, 1899, pp. 22 ff.Google Scholar
page 84 note 1 The copy of the Underscheit from which Dr. Pijper derives his text is the only one known to be extant. It was discovered about eighty years ago by Dr. A. M. Cramer in the Mennonite Library at Amsterdam and was used by him in his life of Menno (1837). More recently it was examined by De Hoop Scheffer and Karl Rembert. The language is the Low Dutch of the time.
- 1
- Cited by