Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:41:21.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability and validity of the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI) in Japanese patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Aya Yamashita ,
Kanako Ichikura ,
Taro Sugimoto ,
Seiji Kishimoto ,
Kojiro Shimozuma  and
Eisuke Matsushima
Aya Yamashita*
Affiliation:
Section of Liaison Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
Kanako Ichikura
Affiliation:
Section of Liaison Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
Taro Sugimoto
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Hospital of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
Seiji Kishimoto
Affiliation:
Section of Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
Kojiro Shimozuma
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan
Eisuke Matsushima
Affiliation:
Section of Liaison Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Aya Yamashita, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan. E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This project evaluated the psychometric properties of a translated version of the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI) for use with Japanese patients. The HNCI is a measure for assessing the quality of life (QoL) of head and neck cancer patients and survivors. The present study was aimed at investigating the reliability and validity of this translated instrument.

Method:

Some 165 patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) were enrolled at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital. The instrument's internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated. Criterion-related validity was assessed by correlations between the HNCI and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck (FACT–H&N) scales.

Results:

Some 29 of the 30 items in the original version were selected to comprise the Japanese version of the HNCI (Japanese HNCI). Investigation of criterion-related validity using the FACT–H&N demonstrated significant correlations (Spearman's ρ = 0.47–0.63). The value of Cronbach's α for each subscale ranged from 0.84 to 0.87. Test–retest reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.62–0.79.

Significance of Results:

The reliability and validity of the Japanese HNCI were evaluated. Although its classification is different from the original U.S. version, the Japanese HNCI is a self-administered questionnaire that can assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with head and neck cancer.

Keywords

Head and Neck Cancer InventoryQuality of lifeHead and neck cancerJapanese cancer patientsHealth status assessment
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , October 2015 , pp. 1373 - 1380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, P. (1986). The cultural context of Japanese sexuality: An American perspective. Psychologia, 29, 1–9.Google Scholar
Barber, C., Powell, R., Ellis, A., et al. (2007). Comparing pain control and ability to eat and drink with standard therapy vs. Gelclair: A preliminary, double centre, randomised controlled trial on patients with radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15(4), 427–440.Google Scholar
Bjordal, K., de Graeff, A. & Fayers, P. (2000). A 12-country field study of the EORTC QLQ–C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer–specific module (EORTC QLQ–H&N35) in head and neck patients. European Journal of Cancer, 36, 1796–1807.Google Scholar
Breitbart, W. & Holland, J. (1988). Psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer. Seminars in Oncology, 15(1), 61–69.Google Scholar
Calman, K.C. (1984). Quality of life in cancer patients: An hypothesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 10(3), 124–127.Google Scholar
Cella, D. (1997). Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system (version 4). Evanston, IL: The Center on Outcomes, Research, and Education, Northwestern Healthcare, and Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Chen, A.M., Daly, M.E., Vazquez, E., et al. (2013). Depression among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy. JAMA Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 139(9), 885–889.Google Scholar
Deno, M., Tashiro, M., Miyashita, M., et al. (2011). Developing the social distress scale for head and neck cancer outpatients in Japan. Palliative & Supportive Care, 9(2), 165–172.Google Scholar
Epstein, J.B., Hong, C., Logan, R.M., et al. (2010). A systematic review of orofacial pain in patients receiving cancer therapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18(8), 1023–1031.Google Scholar
Funk, G.F., Karnell, L.H., Christensen, A.J., et al. (2003). Comprehensive head and neck oncology health status assessment. Head & Neck, 25(7), 561–575.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, pp. 1–29. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haman, K.L. (2008). Psychologic distress and head and neck cancer, part 1: Review of the literature. The Journal of Supportive Oncology, 6(4), 155–163.Google Scholar
Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.Google Scholar
List, M.A. D'Antonio, L.L., Cella, D.F., et al. (1996). The Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck Scale. Cancer, 77(11), 2294–2301.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, L.J., Carey, M.L., Sanson-Fisher, R.W., et al. (2013). Psychological distress in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(4), 1043–1051.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J.H., Mehta, V., Wang, H., et al. (2013). Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: Impact of HPV and primary treatment modality. The Laryngoscope, 124(7), 1592–1597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mochizuki, Y., Matsushima, E. & Omura, K. (2009). Perioperative assessment of psychological state and quality of life of head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 38, 151–159.Google Scholar
Rhee, S., Chang, J. & Rhee, J. (2003). Acculturation, communication patterns, and self-esteem among Asian and Caucasian American adolescents. Adolescence, 38(152), 749–768.Google Scholar
Shimozuma, K. (2002). Quality of life assessment. Breast Cancer, 9(2), 100–106.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. & Hatfield, E. (1996). Premarital sexual standards among U.S. college students: Comparison with Russian and Japanese students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25(3), 261–288.Google Scholar
Terrell, J.E., Ronis, D.L., Fowler, K.E., et al. (2004). Clinical predictors of quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 130(4), 401–408.Google Scholar
Weymuller, E.A. Jr., Alsarraf, R., Yueh, B., et al. (2001). Analysis of the performance characteristics of the University of Washington Quality of Life instrument and its modification (UW–QoL–R). Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 127(5), 489–493.Google Scholar
Zabora, J. & Brintzenhofeszoc, K. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 19–28.Google Scholar
Zeller, J. (2006). High suicide risk found for patients with head and neck cancer. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(14), 1716–1717.Google Scholar