Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:51:51.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability and validity of the Arabic translation of the palliative performance scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2019

Ahmed A.M. Abdelhafeez ,
Nafie F. Makady Open the ORCID record for Nafie F. Makady [Opens in a new window] ,
Ola Hafez ,
Catherine N. Atallah  and
Samy A. Alsirafy
Ahmed A.M. Abdelhafeez
Affiliation:
Palliative Medicine Unit, Kasr Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Nafie F. Makady*
Affiliation:
Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Ola Hafez
Affiliation:
Palliative Medicine Unit, Kasr Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Catherine N. Atallah
Affiliation:
Palliative Medicine Unit, Kasr Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Samy A. Alsirafy
Affiliation:
Palliative Medicine Unit, Kasr Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Nafie F. Makady, Cairo University Hospitals, Alsaray St., Elmaniel, 11451Cairo, Egypt. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to translate the Palliative Performance Scale (PPSv2) into Arabic and to test the reliability and validity of the PPS Arabic translation (PPS-Arabic).

Method

The PPSv2 was translated into Modern Standard Arabic using a forward–backward method. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were tested in a pilot study that included 20 patients. The validation study included 150 cancer patients. Patients were divided according to their treatment plan into three groups (in-remission, palliative chemotherapy, and best supportive care) to perform hypothesis-testing construct validity. Validity was further evaluated by correlating PPS-Arabic with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale, and Physical Functioning (PF2) and Role Functioning (RF2) scales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients for the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.935 (95% CI: 0.88–0.965; p < 0.001) and 0.965 (95% CI: 0.934–0.981; p < 0.001), respectively. The PPS-Arabic internal consistency Cronbach's alpha was 0.986. The average PPS-Arabic score differed significantly (p < 0.001) between the three groups of patients being 89 for in-remission, 58 for palliative chemotherapy, and 38 for best supportive care. The PPS-Arabic score correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with the KPS, ECOG performance scale, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 PF2 and RF2 scales.

Conclusion

The PPS-Arabic is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of performance status of cancer patients.

Keywords

ArabicPalliative Performance ScaleReliabilityTranslationValidation
Type
Original Article
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 575 - 579
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Shahri, MZ, Eldali, AM and Al-Zahrani, O (2012) Prevalence and severity of suffering among patients with advanced cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer 20(12), 3137–3140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Saleh, K, Al-Awadi, A, Soliman, NA, et al. (2017) Timing and outcome of referral to the first stand-alone palliative care center in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, the Palliative Care Center of Kuwait. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 34(4), 325–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, F, Downing, GM, Hill, J, et al. (1996) Palliative Performance Scale (PPS): A new tool. Journal of Palliative Care 12(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baik, D, Russell, D, Jordan, L, et al. (2018) Using the Palliative Performance Scale to estimate survival for patients at the end of life: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Palliative Medicine 21(11), 1651–1661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barallat, E, Nabal, M, Canal, J, et al. (2017) The Spanish adaptation of the Palliative Performance Scale (version 2) among cancer patients at the end of life: Psychometric properties. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 54(4), 570–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chewaskulyong, B, Sapinun, L, Downing, GM, et al. (2012) Reliability and validity of the Thai translation (Thai PPS Adult Suandok) of the Palliative Performance Scale (PPSv2). Palliative Medicine 26(8), 1034–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kock, I, Mirhosseini, M, Lau, F, et al. (2013) Conversion of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) to Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the interchangeability of PPS and KPS in prognostic tools. Journal of Palliative Care 29(3), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, A, Damani, A, Muckaden, MA, et al. (2019) Patient's decisional control preferences of a cohort of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care in India. Journal of Palliative Care 34(3), 175–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hui, D, Meng, YC, Bruera, S, et al. (2016) Referral Criteria for Outpatient Palliative Cancer Care: A Systematic Review. Oncologist 21(7), 895–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hum, A, Wong, YKY, Yee, CM, et al. (2019) PROgnostic Model for Advanced Cancer (PRO-MAC). BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care. pii: bmjspcare-2018-001702. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001702. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
Karnofsky, DA, Abelmann, WH, Craver, LF, et al. (1948) The use of the nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma – with particular reference to bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer 1(4), 634–656.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J, Park, Y, Lim, K, et al. (2019) Care needs of patients at the end of life with a noncancer diagnosis who live at home. Journal of Nursing Research 27(2), e10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maas, EA, Murray, SA, Engles, Y, et al. (2013) What tools are available to identify patients with palliative care needs in primary care: A systematic literature review and survey of European practice? BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care 3, 444–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masterson Creber, R, Russell, D, Dooley, F, et al. (2019) Use of the palliative performance scale to estimate survival among home hospice patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Failure 6(2), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, NR, Dougherty, M, Harris, PS, et al. (2013) Survival after dialysis discontinuation and hospice enrollment for ESRD. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 8(12), 2117–2122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oken, MM, Creech, RH, Tormey, DC, et al. (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 5(6), 649–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seedhom, AE and Kamal, NN (2017) The Palliative Performance Scale predicts survival among emergency department patients, Minia, Egypt. Indian Journal of Palliative Care 23(4), 368–371.Google ScholarPubMed
Simmons, CPL, McMillan, DC, McWilliams, K, et al. (2017) Prognostic tools in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 53(5), 962–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, J, Barbera, L and Sutradhar, R (2015) Do repeated assessments of performance status improve predictions for risk of death among patients with cancer? A population-based cohort study. Palliative Medicine 29(6), 547–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The World Bank (2019). Data: Arab World. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/region/arab-world (accessed 16 July 2019).Google Scholar
Victoria Hospice: Clinical Tools. Palliative Performance Scale. Available at: https://www.victoriahospice.org/i-am-health-care-professional/clinical-toolsGoogle Scholar
Wild, D, Grove, A, Martin, M, et al. (2005) Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health 8(2), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed