Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:24:06.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence and factors associated with demoralization syndrome in patients with advanced disease: Results from a cross-sectional Portuguese study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2016

Miguel Julião ,
Baltazar Nunes  and
António Barbosa
Miguel Julião*
Affiliation:
Hospital da Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Gondomar, Portugal Center of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, and Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Baltazar Nunes
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, National School of Public Health, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
António Barbosa
Affiliation:
Center of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Miguel Julião, Hospital Escola da Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Avenida Fernando Pessoa, No. 150, 4420-096 Gondomar, Portugal. E-Mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Demoralization syndrome (DS) within the context of the psychological experience at the end of life is an important and relevant medical issue and remains the subject of a growing area of research.

Method:

Ours was a cross-sectional study designed to assess the prevalence and associated demographic, physical, psychiatric, and psychosocial factors for demoralization syndrome in Portuguese patients with advanced disease.

Results:

Some 80 terminally ill patients were included in the analyses over a 28-month period of time. The prevalence of DS was found to be 52.5%. No statistical differences were observed among prevalence of DS within categories of all studied variables, with the exception of depression using DSM–IV criteria (prevalence ratio PR = 1.8, CI95% = [1.18–2.74]) and desire for death (PR = 1.8, CI95% = [1.25–2.56]). In the Poisson regression analyses predicting DS, none of the latter factors emerged as significant (DSM–IV criteria: PR = 1.6, CI95% = [0.84–3.08]; and desire for death: PR = 1.5, CI95% = [0.74–2.99]). Thirty percent of participants met both criteria for demoralization syndrome and depression using the DSM–IV.

Significance of Results:

Prevalence of demoralization syndrome was high in this patient sample. Based on our results, we cannot determine if DS and depression are two distinct psychological entities. Identifying factors associated with DS could help provide efficacious interventions capable of diminishing suffering in terminally ill patients.

Keywords

Demoralization syndromeAssociated factorsCross-sectional study
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , October 2016 , pp. 468 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychological Association (APA) (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed (DSM–IV). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Kovacs, M. & Weissman, A. (1975). Hopelessness and suicidal behavior: An overview. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 234, 1146–1149.Google Scholar
Breitbart, W., Rosenfeld, B., Pessin, H., et al. (2000). Depression, hopelessness, and desire for hastened death in terminally ill patients with cancer. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(22), 2907–2911.Google Scholar
Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M.J., et al. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7, 6–9.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., Wilson, K.G., Enns, M., et al. (1995). Desire for death in the terminally ill. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(8), 1185–1191.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., Wilson, K.G., Enns, M., et al. (1998). Depression, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation in the terminally ill. Psychosomatics, 39, 366–370.Google Scholar
Grassi, L., Rossi, E., Sabato, S., et al. (2004). Diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research and psychosocial variables in breast cancer patients. Psychosomatics, 45, 483–491.Google Scholar
Hotopf, M., Chidgey, J., Addington-Hall, J., et al. (2002). Depression in advanced disease: A systematic review. Part 1: Prevalence and case findings. Palliative Medicine, 16(2), 81–97.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, J.C., Vanderwerker, L.C., Block, S.D., et al. (2006). Depression and demoralization as distinct syndromes: Preliminary data from a cohort of advanced cancer patients. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 12, 8–16.Google Scholar
Julião, M., Barbosa, A., Oliveira, F., et al. (2013 a). Prevalence and factors associated with desire for death in patients with advanced disease: Results from a Portuguese cross-sectional study. Psychosomatics, 5454(5), 451–457.Google Scholar
Julião, M., Barbosa, A., Oliveira, F., et al. (2013 b). Efficacy of dignity therapy for depression and anxiety in terminally ill patients: Early results of a randomized controlled trial. Palliative & Supportive Care, 11(6), 481–489.Google Scholar
Julião, M., Oliveira, F., Nunes, B., et al. (2014). Efficacy of dignity therapy on depression and anxiety in Portuguese terminally ill patients: A phase II randomized controlled trial. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 17(6), 688–695.Google Scholar
Julião, M., Nunes, B., Sobral, M.A., et al. (2015). Is it useful to ask “Está deprimido?” (“Are you depressed?”) to terminally ill Portuguese patients? Results from outpatient research. Palliative & Supportive Care, 20, 1–4.Google Scholar
Kissane, D.W. (2000). Psychospiritual and existential distress: The challenge for palliative care. Australian Family Physician, 29(11), 1022–1025.Google Scholar
Kissane, D.W. & Bloch, S. (2002). Family-focused grief therapy: A model of family-centered care during palliative care and bereavement. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kissane, D.W., Wein, S., Love, A., et al. (2004). The demoralization scale: A report of its development and preliminary validation. Journal of Palliative Care, 20, 269–276.Google Scholar
Mullane, M., Dooley, B., Tiernan, E., et al. (2009). Validation of the Demoralization Scale in an Irish advanced cancer sample. Palliative & Supportive Care, 7, 323–330.Google Scholar
Pais-Ribeiro, J., Silva, I., Ferreira, T., et al. (2007). Validation study of a Portuguese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 12(2), 225–237.Google Scholar
Robinson, S., Kissane, D.W., Brooker, J., et al. (2015). A systematic review of the demoralization syndrome in individuals with progressive disease and cancer: A decade of research. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(3), 595–610.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M. & Williams, J.B.W. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM–IV axis I disorders, non-patient edition (SCID–I/NP). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Vehling, S., Lehmann, C., Oechsle, K., et al. (2012). Is advanced cancer associated with demoralization and lower global meaning? The role of tumor stage and physical problems in explaining existential distress in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 21, 54–63.Google Scholar