Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:51:27.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palliative care referral practices and perceptions: The divide between metropolitan and non-metropolitan general practitioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

Claire E. Johnson ,
Afaf Girgis ,
Christine L. Paul  and
David C. Currow
Claire E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Research and Psycho-oncology, The Cancer Council NSW/University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
Afaf Girgis*
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Research and Psycho-oncology, The Cancer Council NSW/University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
Christine L. Paul
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Research and Psycho-oncology, The Cancer Council NSW/University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
David C. Currow
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Afaf Girgis, Centre for Health Research and Psycho-oncology, The Cancer Council NSW/University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Locked bag 10, Wallsend NSW 2287, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Late or non-referral of patients to specialist palliative care (SPC) services may affect patients' and their carers' quality of care. General practitioners (GPs) are key professionals in linking people with SPC. The aim of this article is to assess GPs' perceptions and SPC referrals for their patients with advanced cancer and differences between metropolitan (M GPs) and non-metropolitan GPs (NM GPs).

Method:

Self-report survey mailed to a stratified random sample of 1,680 Australian GPs was used.

Results:

Thirty-one percent (469) of eligible GPs returned surveys. More M GPs than NM GPs reported referring >60% of their patients for SPC (p = 0.014); and that a more comprehensive range of SPC services was available. The most frequently reported referral prompts were: presence of terminal illness (M GPs, 71%, NM GPs, 66%, ns (not significant)); future need for symptom control (69% vs. 59%, ns) and uncontrolled physical symptoms (63% vs. 54%, ns). Reasons for not referring were: doctor's ability to manage symptoms (62% vs. 68%, ns) and the absence of symptoms (29% vs. 18%, p = 0.025). Higher referral was associated with: having a palliative care physician or consultative service available; agreeing that all patients with advanced cancer should be referred, and agreeing that with SPC, the needs of the family are better met.

Significance of results:

Referrals for SPC were primarily disease-related rather than for psychological and emotional concerns. Measures are needed to encourage referrals based upon psychosocial needs as well as for physical concerns, and to support GPs caring for people with advanced cancer in areas with fewer comprehensive SPC services.

Keywords

Palliative careReferralAttitudesAccessGeneral practitioner
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 181 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. Milton Keynes. UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
AMPCo Direct. (2002). AMPCo Medical Masterfile. Unpublished manuscript, Sydney.Google Scholar
Australia Post. (2005). Print Post Sort Plan Guide. http://www1.auspost.com.au/download/PrintPost_sort_plan.pdfGoogle Scholar
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. (2005). General Practice in Australia: 2004. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.Google Scholar
Brickner, L., Scannell, K., Marquet, S., et al. (2004). Barriers to hospice care and referrals: Survey of physicians' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in a health maintenance organization. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 7, 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell Research & Consulting. (2006). Community Attitudes Towards Palliative Care. North Fitzroy: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. (2000). General Practice in Australia: 2000. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care.Google Scholar
Currow, D.C. & Nightingale, E.M. (2003). “A planning guide”: Developing a consensus document for palliative care service provision. Medical Journal of Australia, 149, S23–S25.Google Scholar
Fallowfield, L., Ratcliffe, D., Jenkins, V., et al. (2001). Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 84, 1011–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, B.T., Harwood, M.K. & Shields, M. (2002). Barriers and enablers to hospice referrals: An expert overview. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hays, R.B., Veitch, P.C., Cheers, B., et al. (1997). Why doctors leave rural practice. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 5, 198–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, C., Girgis, A., Paul, C., et al. (2008). Cancer specialists' palliative care referral practices and perceptions: results of a national survey. Palliative Medicine, 22, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAvoy, B.R. & Kaner, E.F.S. (1996). General practice postal surveys: A questionnaire too far? British Medical Journal, 313, 732–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, G.K. (2002). How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 16, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mount Olivet Community Service. (2003). Research Study into the Educational, Training and Support Needs of General Practitioners in Palliative Care. Canberra: Rural Health and Palliative Care Branch, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.Google Scholar
Newell, S., Sanson Fisher, R.W., Girgis, A., et al. (1998). How well do medical oncologists' perceptions reflect their patients' reported physical and psychosocial problems? Cancer, 83, 1640–1651.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogle, K.S., Mavis, B. & Wyatt, G.K. (2002). Physicians and hospice care: Attitudes, knowledge, and referrals. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palliative Care Australia. (2005). A Guide to Palliative Care Service Development: A Population Based Approach. Deakin West: Palliative Care Australia.Google Scholar
Quantum Market Research. (2003). Community Attitudes to Palliative Care Issues – Quantitative Report. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. (1999–2001). SAS System for Windows (Version 8). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Steinhauser, K.E., Christakis, N.A., Clipp, E.C., et al. (2000). Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians and other care providers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 248, 2476–2482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, R., Strasser, R.P., Hays, R.B., et al. (2000). Is Australian rural practice changing? Findings from the National Rural General Practice Study. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 8, 222–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2002). National Cancer Control Programmes: Policies and Managerial Guideline, 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar