Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:58:13.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How did partners experience cancer patients' participation in a phase I study? An observational study after a patient's death

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2015

Simone M.C.H. Langenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Marlies E.W.J. Peters
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Winette T.A. van der Graaf
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Anke N. Machteld Wymenga
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Judith B. Prins
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Carla M.L. van Herpen
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Simone Langenberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, Route 452, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Objective:

It can be assumed that patients' participation in a phase I study will have an important impact on their partners' life. However, evaluation of partners' experiences while patients are undergoing experimental treatment and of their well-being after the patient's death is lacking. We aimed to explore partners' experience of patients' participation in phase I studies and to investigate their well-being after a patient's death.

Method:

This was an observational study conducted after the patient's death. Partners of deceased patients who had participated in a phase I study completed a questionnaire designed by us for experience evaluation and the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Inventory of Traumatic Grief, and the RAND-36 Health Survey.

Results:

The median age of the 58 participating partners was 58 years (range: 51–65), and 67% was female. Partners reported negative effects on patients' quality of life, but only 5% of partners regretted patients' participation. Approximately two years after the patients' death, 19% of partners scored for depression, 36% for psychological distress, and 46% for complicated grief, and partners generally scored significantly lower on social and mental functioning compared to normative comparators.

Significance of Results:

Although partners reported negative consequences on patients' quality of life, most did not regret patients' participation in the phase I studies. Prevalence of depression, psychological distress, and complicated grief seemed important problems after a patient's death, and these must be considered when shaping further support for partners of patients participating in phase I trials.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, M. & Emanuel, E.J. (2003). Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies: Reexamining the arguments and data. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(8), 10751082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, M., Grady, C., Fairclough, D.L., et al. (2006). Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(27), 44794484.Google Scholar
Allen, J.Y., Haley, W.E., Small, B.J., et al. (2013). Bereavement among hospice caregivers of cancer patients one year following loss: Predictors of grief, complicated grief, and symptoms of depression. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 16(7), 745751.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Guth, D., Steer, R.A., et al. (1997). Screening for major depression disorders in medical inpatients with the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(8), 785791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boelen, P.A., van den Bout, J., de Keijser, J., et al. (2003). Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Inventory of Traumatic Grief (ITG). Death Studies, 27(3), 227247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catt, S., Langridge, C., Fallowfield, L., et al. (2011). Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in phase 1 cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer, 47(10), 14901497.Google Scholar
Chiu, Y.W., Huang, C.T., Yin, S.M., et al. (2010). Determinants of complicated grief in caregivers who cared for terminal cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18(10), 13211327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, K. (2000). Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: Recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants' experiences. Psycho-Oncology, 9(4), 314322.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fujisawa, D., Miyashita, M., Nakajima, S., et al. (2010). Prevalence and determinants of complicated grief in the general population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 127(1–3), 352358.Google Scholar
Given, B.A., Given, C.W. & Sherwood, P. (2012). The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 28(4), 205212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guldin, M.B., Vedsted, P., Zachariae, R., et al. (2012). Complicated grief and need for professional support in family caregivers of cancer patients in palliative care: A longitudinal cohort study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(8), 16791685.Google Scholar
Gysels, M.H., Evans, C. & Higginson, I.J. (2012). Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: A critical interpretive synthesis of the literature. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 123.Google Scholar
Joffe, S., Cook, E.F., Cleary, P.D., et al. (2001). Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 358(9295), 17721777.Google Scholar
Kersting, A., Brahler, E., Glaesmer, H., et al. (2011). Prevalence of complicated grief in a representative population-based sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 131(1–3), 339343.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. & Carver, C.S. (2012). Recognizing the value and needs of the caregiver in oncology. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 6(2), 280288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Y., Kashy, D.A., Spillers, R.L., et al. (2010). Needs assessment of family caregivers of cancer survivors: Three cohorts comparison. Psycho-Oncology, 19(6), 573582.Google Scholar
Newson, R.S., Boelen, P.A., Hek, K., et al. (2011). The prevalence and characteristics of complicated grief in older adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 132(1–2), 231238.Google Scholar
Norton, S., Cosco, T., Doyle, F., et al. (2013). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A meta-confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 74(1), 7481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, N.M. (2013). Treating complicated grief. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(4), 416423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinhoven, P., Ormel, J., Sloekers, P.P., et al. (1997). A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychological Medicine, 27(2), 363370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steer, R.A., Cavalieri, T.A., Leonard, D.M., et al. (1999). Use of the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care to screen for major depression disorders. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21(2), 106111.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M., Schut, H. & Stroebe, W. (2007). Health outcomes of bereavement. Lancet, 370(9603), 19601973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, K., Hudson, P., Trauer, T., et al. (2013). Risk factors for developing prolonged grief during bereavement in family carers of cancer patients in palliative care: A longitudinal study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47(3), 531541.Google Scholar
VanderZee, K.I., Sanderman, R., Heyink, J.W., et al. (1996). Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: A multidimensional measure of general health status. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 3(2), 104122.Google ScholarPubMed
van Ryn, M., Sanders, S., Kahn, K., et al. (2011). Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: A hidden quality issue? Psycho-Oncology, 20(1), 4452.Google Scholar
Williams, A.L. & McCorkle, R. (2011). Cancer family caregivers during the palliative, hospice, and bereavement phases: A review of the descriptive psychosocial literature. Palliative & Supportive Care, 9(3), 315325.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2010). Definition of palliative care. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar